Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Kazakh(Russian) Language

Zhaxylykova Beybitgul Seitkasymovna

Description: As part of the course, students fully master the grammar of the Kazakh language, enrich their language skills. He has a lexical and terminological minimum in his specialty. Develops communicative means characteristic of individual small styles; develops reading and listening skills, introduces to the creation of various scientific texts, word-formation models.pragmatically enough.

Amount of credits: 10

Пререквизиты:

Kazakh(Russian) Language
Казахский (русский) язык. Школьный курс

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	45
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Abstract
Form of final control	Abstract
Final assessment method	written Exam

Component: Mandatory component

Cycle: Secondary disciplines

Goal

Ensuring high-quality mastery of the Kazakh language from the point of view of the Kazakh national culture as a means of social, intercultural, professional and communication through the formation of communicative competencies in all types of speech activity in accordance with the qualification level B1.

Objective

- General education disciplines aimed at the formation of the socio-humanitarian outlook of students within the framework of the national idea of spiritual modernization; - Тhe formation of knowledge in the future specialist on the basis of national consciousness and cultural code, the belief that language is a link in mastering world-class knowledge, training specialists to ensure the modernization of the expansion of the scope of application of the Kazakh language.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

- to choose and use language and speech-learning tools correctly based on a full understanding of vocabulary, grammatical system of knowledge and pragmatic content of intentions;

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

- convey the exact content of the text, be able to formulate conclusions, characterize the final part of the entire text and its individual structural parts;

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

-to explain textual information, to reveal stylistic and genre features of social, socio-cultural, socio-political, educational and professional texts;

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

-be able to request and report information in accordance with the communication situation, evaluate the actions of participants in speech communication, use information to influence a familiar or unfamiliar interlocutor; - to demonstrate personal, social and professional competencies in accordance with the peculiarities of linguistic and cultural communication;

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

- discuss ethical, cultural and socially significant issues at discussions, be able to express their point of view, justify it, critically evaluate the opinion of participants; - to realize personal needs (everyday, educational, social, cultural, professional), to be able to participate in various communication situations in order to express ethically correct, from a meaningful point of view, complete, at the proper lexico-grammatical and pragmatic level of their position.

Teaching methods

1. Problem-based learning: creating problematic situations and organizing students' active activities to resolve them, as a result of which there is a creative mastery of the basics, skills, skills, mental abilities develop; 2. research methods: self-discovery through immersion in the studied problem and finding ways to solve it; 3. Technology of game methods (role-playing, business and other types of educational games): the development of cognitive activity, the presence of certain skills and abilities necessary in practice.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Monologue, composing dialogues, conversation	0-100
	Protection of a mini-project
	Discussion
	Еssay
	Exercises, preparation of messages, cinquain
	Development and discussion of video materials.
	Preparation for an oral answer
	Repetition. Milestone control work.
2 rating	Performing exercises, discussing video materials.	0-100
	Working with text. Grammar exercises.
	Group project protection
	Video clip
	Passing the lexical minimum
	Poster, cinquain, associograms
	Milestone control work.
Total control	Abstract, Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Work on practical (seminar) classes	completed the practical work in full with the necessary sequence of actions; correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, etc. in the response; correctly performs error analysis. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, is able to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines;	fulfilled the requirements for the rating "5", but 2-3 shortcomings were made. The student's answer to the questions satisfies the basic requirements for the answer to 5, but is given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using connections with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other disciplines; one mistake or no more than two shortcomings are made, the student can correct them independently or with a little help	I did not complete the work completely, but not less than 50% of the volume of practical work, which allows me to get the correct results and conclusions; mistakes were made during the work. When answering questions, the student correctly understands the essence of the question, but in the answer there are separate problems in the assimilation of the course questions that do not prevent further assimilation of the program material; no more than one gross error and two shortcomings were made.	completed the practical work in full with the necessary sequence of actions; correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, etc. in the response; correctly performs error analysis. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, is able to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines;
Written Work/Essay	work answers everything requirements, as well as distinguished by scientific novelty. Essay topic is fully disclosed, the author’s position is clearly expressed, there are logical and justified conclusions. The essay is written based on the recommended primary and additional literature. At a high level work completed	the same requirements as for evaluation "Great". Together with those studying not used literature offered in the program academic discipline. Overall essay topic opened; conclusions formulated, but not sufficiently substantiated; the necessary both main and additional literature; the author's identity is not clearly demonstrated position. Competent decor	the topic is revealed on basis of use several main and additional sources; weak own position, conclusions there are, but they are not justified; material presented inconsistently, without appropriate argumentation. There are design flaws	work answers everything requirements, as well as distinguished by scientific novelty. Essay topic is fully disclosed, the author’s position is clearly expressed, there are logical and justified conclusions. The essay is written based on the recommended primary and additional literature. At a high level work completed
Oral survey	comprehensive and reasonable answers were given to all the questions posed;) the main points were highlighted in the answers, the answers were clear and concise, and thoughts were presented in a logical sequence; demonstrated the ability to independently analyze facts, events, phenomena, processes in their interrelation and development	complete, sufficiently substantiated answers to the questions posed were given; the main thing was not always highlighted in the answers; the answers were mostly brief and not always clear	Basically, the correct answers to all the questions posed were given, but without the proper depth and justification; when answering the questions, the main thing was not highlighted; there is no proper logical sequence; Some additional questions are not answered, limited vocabulary	comprehensive and reasonable answers were given to all the questions posed;) the main points were highlighted in the answers, the answers were clear and concise, and thoughts were presented in a logical sequence; demonstrated the ability to independently analyze facts, events, phenomena, processes in their interrelation and development
Чтение с пониманием основного содержания прочитанного текста	understands the main content of the original text, can highlight the main idea, determine the main facts, can guess the meaning of unfamiliar words from the context, either by word-forming elements, or by similarity to the native language.	Understands the main content of the original text, can highlight the main idea, and identify individual facts. But the language guess is not sufficiently developed, it is difficult to understand some unfamiliar words, often consult the dictionary, and the reading pace is slower.	He does not quite accurately understand the main content of what he read, he can identify only a small number of facts in the text, and his linguistic guesswork is not at all developed.	understands the main content of the original text, can highlight the main idea, determine the main facts, can guess the meaning of unfamiliar words from the context, either by word-forming elements, or by similarity to the native language.
Лексико-грамматическая работа	The correct definition of the lexical meaning of words, the presence of minor errors is not allowed. Fully expounds the studied material, gives correct definitions of linguistic concepts; discovers an understanding of the material, can justify his judgments, apply knowledge in practice, can give the necessary examples; presents the material consistently and correctly from the point of view of the norms of the literary language.	The student gives a complete answer, but makes 1-2 mistakes, which he corrects himself and 1-2 flaws in the sequence and linguistic design of the material being presented.	The student discovers knowledge and understanding of the main provisions of this topic, but presents the material incompletely and admits inaccuracies in the definition of concepts or the formulation of rules; does not know how to substantiate his judgments in sufficient depth and evidence and give his examples; presents the material inconsistently and makes mistakes in the linguistic design of what is being presented.	The correct definition of the lexical meaning of words, the presence of minor errors is not allowed. Fully expounds the studied material, gives correct definitions of linguistic concepts; discovers an understanding of the material, can justify his judgments, apply knowledge in practice, can give the necessary examples; presents the material consistently and correctly from the point of view of the norms of the literary language.
Рубежный контроль	The work was done without errors and defects, 100% of the tasks must be completed	It is put to work if there is no more than one blunt error and one flaw in it, no more than three flaws. Between 70 and 89% of the tasks must be completed	It is set if the student has correctly completed at least 50% of the entire work or has made no more than one gross error and two defects, no more than one gross and one coarse error, no more than three coarse errors, one coarse error and three defects, if there are four or five defects	The work was done without errors and defects, 100% of the tasks must be completed
Реферат	All the requirements for writing and defending the abstract have been fulfilled: the problem has been identified and its relevance justified, a brief analysis of various points of view on the problem under consideration has been made and one's own position has been logically stated, conclusions have been formulated, the topic has been fully disclosed, the volume has been maintained, the requirements for external design have been met, correct answers to additional questions have been given. The content of the topic is fully disclosed, and the work corresponds to the chosen topic, there are reasonable conclusions for each section; the work is framed correctly, there are insignificant stylistic errors; the work was done independently, all the selected literature was analyzed and used in the work	Тhe basic requirements for the abstract and its protection are fulfilled, but there are shortcomings. In particular, there are inaccuracies in the presentation of the material; there is no logical consistency in judgments; the volume of the abstract is not maintained; there are omissions in the design; incomplete answers are given to additional questions during the defense. The content of the work mostly corresponds to the topic or its volume is overstated, the conclusions mostly correspond to the content of the section; the work is mostly framed correctly, there are some insignificant stylistic and grammatical errors; the work was done mostly independently, the literature was used	There are significant deviations from the requirements and abstraction. In particular, the topic is only partially covered; factual errors were made in the content of the abstract or in answering additional questions; there is no conclusion during the defense. The content of the work partially corresponds to the topic; conclusions are not drawn for all sections of the work or partially correspond to the content of the section, or there are no conclusions based on the data provided; the work is designed mostly correctly, there are significant stylistic and grammatical errors, carelessness was made in the design of the work: fields were not left, there was no page numbering, corrections were made to the text, the title page was incorrectly designed; constant help from colleagues was required to complete the work, the literature was partially used	All the requirements for writing and defending the abstract have been fulfilled: the problem has been identified and its relevance justified, a brief analysis of various points of view on the problem under consideration has been made and one's own position has been logically stated, conclusions have been formulated, the topic has been fully disclosed, the volume has been maintained, the requirements for external design have been met, correct answers to additional questions have been given. The content of the topic is fully disclosed, and the work corresponds to the chosen topic, there are reasonable conclusions for each section; the work is framed correctly, there are insignificant stylistic errors; the work was done independently, all the selected literature was analyzed and used in the work
Письменный экзамен	The content of the written work fully meets the requirements; there are no actual errors, 100% of the tasks must be completed; the content is presented consistently; the work is distinguished by the richness of the dictionary, the accuracy of word usage. In general, 1 defect in the content and 1-2 speech defects are allowed in the work.Allowed: -1 spelling, or -1 punctuation, or -1 grammatical error.	The content of the work mostly corresponds to the topic (there are minor deviations from the topic); the content is mostly reliable, but there are isolated factual inaccuracies; there are minor violations of consistency in the presentation of thoughts. In general, no more than 2 defects in content and no more than 3-4 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: 2 spelling and 2 punctuation errors, or -1 spelling and 3 punctuation errors, or -4 punctuation errors in the absence of spelling errors, as well as 2 grammatical errors. Between 70 and 89% of the tasks must be completed	There are significant deviations from the question in the work; the work is reliable in the main, but there are some factual inaccuracies; incorrect usage occurs. In general, no more than 4 defects in content and 5 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: 4 spelling and 4 punctuation errors, or 3 spelling errors and 5 punctuation errors, or 7 punctuation errors in the absence of spelling errors. The student has correctly completed at least 50% of all work.	The content of the written work fully meets the requirements; there are no actual errors, 100% of the tasks must be completed; the content is presented consistently; the work is distinguished by the richness of the dictionary, the accuracy of word usage. In general, 1 defect in the content and 1-2 speech defects are allowed in the work.Allowed: -1 spelling, or -1 punctuation, or -1 grammatical error.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

The place of the individual in society
Family and traditions
All professions are good
Society and youth
The first wealth is health
Нuman and ecology
Travel and tourism
Нuman and nature
Нuman and time
Culture and art
Character and appearance
Fashion and taste
Literature and art
My motherland
Residential building and architectural structure

Key reading

1. Zhaksylykova B. S. Kazakh language (level B1). Textbook – for students of technical universities)-Ust-Kamenogorsk: EKTU, 2023. p. 112 2. Balabekov A. K., Bozbayeva-Hung A. T., Dosmambetova G. K., Salikhova B. O., Kazakh language: textbook for intermediate level. National Testing Center. - Astana: 2017 3. Kuzekova Z. S., Baytelieva Zh. D. Kazakh language: textbook. - Astana, 2016. 4. Zhekeeva K. O. Kazakh language (level B-1). Textbook (for students of technical universities) - Almaty: AUES, 2020. p. 85 5. Ernazarova Z. Sh., Tileshov E. E. et al. Kazakh language: a three-level textbook / - Astana: Arman-Media, 2013.

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan