Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

AutoCAD and Manual Drawing

Espolova Zukhra Ablkasymovna

Description: The course includes both elements of descriptive geometry and technical drawing. The course deals with the necessary information on drawing, geometric constructions and projection drawing. Particular attention is paid to the development and execution of design documentation. Mastering the AutoCad program, students will be able to design documentation using the tools of this program, as well as to master the possibility of automating the process of creating various projects.

Amount of credits: 5

Пререквизиты:

Mathematics 1

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works
Laboratory works	45
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	creative examination

Component: University component

Cycle: Base disciplines

Goal

Assimilation by students of the rules, requirements and norms, the knowledge of which is necessary for the implementation and reading of product drawings, the ability to work with reference literature and standards, instill and consolidate the skills of performing drawings in accordance with ESKD standards in the process of performing practical tasks. The ultimate goal of studying the discipline is to acquire knowledge, skills and abilities to use CAD when performing design documentation.

Objective

Acquaintance with the rules for compiling project documentation; mastering the requirements for the drawing, the rules and norms for its implementation; practical development of the implementation of the working drawing of the part and assembly unit by performing tests.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

Learners must understand: • about the technique of making drawings; • on the application of USDD standards; • on drawing up orthogonal and axonometric drawings.

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

projection drawing method; principle, device, mechanism and design of machine elements; ways of fixing the image of building objects in space, the basics of standardization, typical designs, detachable and one-piece connections, regulatory and technical documents, principles of their application and design; - must be able to use assembly, disassembly drawing and sketch, assembly, disassembly in production and design activities, drawings and sketches, standards, technical view and product diagram, construction drawing.

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

Spatial representation and imagination; • drawing technique; • application of USDD standards; • drawing up orthogonal and axonometric drawings.

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

Key competencies are: ─ analysis of the task and initial data for the development of design documentation; - the ability to promptly develop the required design documentation in accordance with applicable standards and norms; - the ability to find organizational and managerial decisions in production situations.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

Skills: Learners should have the skills to: ─ solve spatial problems on a complex drawing; ─ to represent the spatial arrangement of parts and the principle of operation of the product according to the drawing; ─ draw a part and an assembly unit; ─ apply ESKD standards; ─ acquisition of skills and abilities to use CAD when performing design documentation.

Teaching methods

The following educational technologies are planned to be used during training sessions. - Subsequence. Diagnosis of educational goals; Technologization of the educational process. Traditional technologies for teaching the subject are provided: classroom lessons and independent work of students. The theoretical course is presented in multimedia format. Text, audio and video information, graphics, drawings, etc. b. used. - creating scenarios for the development of various situations based on given conditions; - information and communication (classes in a computer class using professional packages of the graphic application program AutoCAD); - search and research (independent research activity of students in the educational process); - laboratory lesson in the form of discussion (group discussions when discussing a problem in the form of discussion and exchange of opinions); - discussion of the results of the work of student scientific circles.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Plot. Tasks 1,2 (metric problem, traces of a straight line) of Plots. Tasks 3,4,5 (mutual position of straight lines)	0-100
	Plot. Tasks 7, 8,9 (plane, main lines of the plane)
	Projection drawing. Kinds
2 rating	2Epure. Tasks 1) Intersection of two flat surfaces rice. 2) Construct a plane located at a distance of 50mm from one of the flat bodies and parallel to it 3) build the height of the plane ABC	0-100
	Projection drawing. cuts
	Projection drawing. cross section
Total control	Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
conversation on control questions	demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, explains logically and in order the meaning of phenomena and processes, draws reasonable conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly answer clarifying questions.	demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, logically and consistently explains the meaning of phenomena and processes, makes reasonable conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, is fluent in monologue speech, but makes minor mistakes that can be corrected independently or with little effort. correction by the teacher.	demonstrates superficial theoretical knowledge, poorly formed skills in analyzing phenomena and processes, inability to draw substantiated conclusions and give examples, has insufficient command of monologue speech, terminology, logic and consistency of presentation, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by corrections by the teacher.	demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, explains logically and in order the meaning of phenomena and processes, draws reasonable conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly answer clarifying questions.
Work in laboratory classes	Completed the laboratory work in full, following the required sequence of actions; performs all drawings and calculations correctly and accurately; performs error analysis correctly. When answering questions, he correctly understands the meaning of the question, clearly defines and explains the main concepts; supports the answer with new examples, can use knowledge in a new situation; can establish connections between the taught material and previously read material, as well as with material accumulated in the study of other subjects.	“5” fulfilled the rating requirements, but sent 2-3 defects. The student’s answer to the questions satisfies the basic requirements, but he did not use knowledge on the case, was unable to establish a connection with previously studied material, with material accumulated during the study of other subjects; If one mistake or no more than two mistakes are made, the student can correct it independently or with the help of the teacher.	the work is not completely completed, but more than 50% of the laboratory work has been completed, which allows us to obtain correct results and conclusions; Errors were made during the work. When answering questions, the student correctly understands the meaning of the question, but certain problems arise in mastering the course questions, which do not interfere with the further assimilation of the program material when answering; no more than one gross error and two omissions were made.	Completed the laboratory work in full, following the required sequence of actions; performs all drawings and calculations correctly and accurately; performs error analysis correctly. When answering questions, he correctly understands the meaning of the question, clearly defines and explains the main concepts; supports the answer with new examples, can use knowledge in a new situation; can establish connections between the taught material and previously read material, as well as with material accumulated in the study of other subjects.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of laboratory classes

Introduction to the discipline "Engineering and computer graphics graphics"
Creation of complex drawings (Monge plots)
Creation of complex drawings (Monge plots)
The plane
The plane
The plane
The purpose of CAD systems, the AutoCAD graphics program
Design documentation and its design, study of standards GOST 2
Images - types, GOST 2
The Annotation panel
Editing drawing objects in Autocad: selecting objects, editing commands
Rules for executing images in a drawing
Rules for executing images in a drawing
Axonometric projections
All-in-one detachable connections and their image in the drawing

Key reading

1. Chekmarev, A. A. Engineering graphics: textus pro applicando gradu baculari/13th ed., recognitus. et additional -- Moscoviae : Yurayt Publishing House, 2019. - 389 s. 2. http://engineering-graphics. spb. ru/book. php - Electronic textbook 3. Brodskij-Inzhenerlik-grafika-metall-deu.-O-uly-.pdf 4. Aytimbetov Z.Ә., Karpekov R.K., Graphics Engineer; Officina: -Almaty: ATU, I59 2015. – 51b. 5. Ulasevich Z.N., Ulasevich V.P., Omes D.V., Opera graphica: Officina: Textus, -2nd ed., recognitus - Minsk: Scholae superioris, 2020. -206 s. 6. Orlov A., AutoCAD 2013. – Petropoli: Petri, 2013. – 384 s.

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan