Special Drawing
Description: The abstract-analytical direction in drawing as a form of architectural creativity based on practical mastering of compositional, constructive-spatial, graphic approaches and methods of depicting spatial objects is considered.
Amount of credits: 4
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | |
Practical works | 45 |
Laboratory works | |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 15 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 60 |
Form of final control | Exam |
Final assessment method | Creative exam Theme "Draw the interior of the classroom" |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Base disciplines
Goal
- The purpose of the discipline: mastering the skills of abstract-analytical drawing spatial objects by imagination. Formation of creative thinking, knowledge and methods of creating constructive drawing. Providing artistic-graphic and compositional training Architects, designers,
Objective
- - study of the creative heritage of famous architects (sketches, professional drawings, etc.); - development of abstract thinking and skills of graphic embodiment spatial conceptual forms and objects; - development of constructional-realistic and abstract form analysis skills; - formation of graphic skills and aesthetic taste.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- Possess qualities in finding artistic specific means, new figurative and plastic solutions for each creative task.
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- understanding the principles of a realistic image of the objective world
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- the ability to graphically express one's thoughts and creative ideas, to create new images and compositional ideas
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- be able to competently, freely and professionally express their opinions, judgments in communication with colleagues and customers. 2. - contribute to competently express in a graphic image to present project idea -freely use the acquired skills in all creative disciplines
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- possession of the methodology and graphic technique for constructing a constructive and light-tonal drawing
Teaching methods
-The following is an example of the use of the same technology The technology is the only thing you can do: - The following are the most important elements of the technology: the quality of the product, the student's quality of life, the quality of the equipment The following activities are included in this book: light art, slideshows, and technical details; - The following is an example of how to use the book (or the book is not in the book) the student's process); - The following are examples of the way in which the student process works; - The innovative portfolios of the student's innovative process
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | Search for a composition on the theme "Rhythm | 0-100 |
Drawing on the theme "Rhythm" | ||
Drawing on the theme "Rhythm in the urban environment" | ||
2 rating | Drawing on the "Interior" of a public building | 0-100 |
Fantasy drawing on the theme "Furustic interior" | ||
A fantasy drawing on the theme "The City of the Future | ||
Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of practical classes
- Topic 1 Introductory Talk: Conceptual Drawing in the Work of Famous architects
- Theme 2 Perform a light and tonal drawing of a formal spatial composition of geometrical figures on the theme "Rhythm," FA2
- Theme 3 Execute a linear-constructive drawing of an interior by imagination with the use of spatial elements (arches, trusses, stairs, etc
- Theme 4 Perform a light-tonal drawing by imagination on House in the Natural Environment", FA2
- Topic 5 perform an abstract composition on the theme "City and natural landscape", FA2
- Theme 6 Make an abstract drawing on the topic "The Inner Space of the City of the Future"
Key reading
- 1. Nikolay Li: Risunok. Osnovy uchebnogo akademicheskogo risunka. Uchebnik., Eksmo, M., 2015. 2. Risunok dlya arkhitektorov / Magali Del'gado Yanes, Ernest Redondo Domingez ; Perevod s ispanskogo YU. V. Sevost'yanovoy; Nauchnyy konsul'tant O. B. Antonenko. — M.: ArtRodnik, 2005. — 191 s. 3. Osmolovskaya O. V., Musatov A. A. Risunok po predstavleniyu v teorii i uprazhneniyakh ot geometrii k arkhitekture. Uchebnoye posobiye. 3-ye izdaniye. –M.: Arkhitektura-S, 2015. – 412 s 1. Nikolai Li: Drawing. Fundamentals of educational academic drawing. Textbook., Eksmo, M., 2015. 2. Drawing for architects / Magali Delgado Yanes, Ernest Redondo Dominguez; Translation from Spanish Yu. V. Sevostyanova; Scientific consultant O. B. Antonenko. — M.: ArtRodnik, 2005. — 191 p. 3. Osmolovskaya O. V., Musatov A. A. Drawing on representation in theory and exercises from geometry to architecture. Tutorial. 3rd edition. -M.: Architecture-S, 2015. - 412
Further reading
- Maksimov O. Risunok v professii arkhitektora. – M.:Librokom, 2020. – 416 s.5. 5. Sayty: https://architime.ru/, http://competitions.archplatforma.ru/