Undergraduate Analysis
Description: A study of one of the modern actual architectural and urban planning problems is being conducted, which precedes the writing of a thesis on an individual topic, including the justification of the relevance and methodology of studying the issue with the formulation of a scientific hypothesis and possible results.
Amount of credits: 7
Пререквизиты:
- Architectural Design VI
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | |
| Practical works | 75 |
| Laboratory works | |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 105 |
| Course Project | |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | Creative Examination - Clausura |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- Рrepare a set of scientific, practical and methodological materials for subsequent independent research work during the writing of the thesis.
Objective
- study of domestic and foreign experience in designing objects on the topic of undergraduate research;
- substantiation of the relevance of the study and the subject matter of the graduation project;
- conducting a pre-project factor-by-factor analysis of the situation of the object placement;
- determination of the socio-functional program of objects on the topic of the graduation project;
- development of a pre-project concept on the topic of the graduation project;
- formation of a program-task for a graduation project, defense of the work.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- to analyze the most relevant modern architectural and urban planning problems of the region (the country as a whole);
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- analyze and systematize data on the study of the problem;
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- to determine the subject of scientific research with the formulation of goals and objectives; formulate the scientific hypothesis of the study and possible results;
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- to select and use the methodology of studying the topic corresponding to the goals and objectives; describe methods and approaches to the study of the problem;
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- to formalize the results of the study in accordance with the requirements for scientific papers.
Teaching methods
technologies of problem-based and project-oriented learning;
clause method;
technologies of educational and research activities.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Formulation of the topic of the graduation project | 0-100 |
| Social and functional program | ||
| Overview abstract | ||
| 2 rating | Architectural and planning task | 0-100 |
| Abstract-justification | ||
| Architectural concept | ||
| Total control | Exam, Course Project | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Practical lessons | - completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creatively. | - completion of work on time and in the amount of 70 to 89% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly, but may contain minor errors that can be easily corrected by correction; - aesthetics of work design at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied. | - completion of work not on time and in the amount of 50 to 69% in accordance with the task; - some tasks were completed incorrectly (but not more than 50%), may contain errors that can be corrected; - aesthetics of work design at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and standard solutions are applied. | - completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creatively. |
| Creative Examination - Clausura | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered in full. The arrangement of clause elements with a slight violation of scale and compositional integrity. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is slightly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a good level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 70 to 89%. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered to a greater extent. The arrangement of the elements of the clause has violations of scale and compositional integrity, and the depth of elaboration is insufficient. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is significantly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a satisfactory level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 50 to 69%. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of practical classes
- Formulation of the theme of the graduation project
- Determination of the urban planning situation for the placement of the design object
- Graphical work
- Historical analysis of the design object
- Analysis of domestic and foreign experience in designing an object
- Typological and planning analysis of the design object
- Overview essay on the topic of the graduation project
- Formulation of a socio-functional program for the design object
- Drawing up an abstract-justification for the projected object
- Collection of regulatory requirements for the development object
- Development of an architectural and planning task for the project
- Functional and planning solution of the object
- Identification of typological / town-planning features of the compositional structure of the object
- Substantiation abstract
- Functional and planning solution of the object
- Development of a master plan
- Identification of the typological features of the compositional structure of the object
- Development of the design concept of the graduation project in the form of a layout and graphic material
- Systematization of graphic material and its design
Key reading
- Svod printsipov kompleksnogo razvitiya gorodskikh territorii. Kniga 1. – M.: STRELKA MAG, 2019. – 296 s. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://storage.strategy24.ru/files/news/202011/f5e0259188e448256fc204402df4df4c.pdf
- Standart razvitiya zastroennykh territorii. Kniga 2. – M.: STRELKA MAG, 2019. – 234 s. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293730/4293730325.pdf
- Standart osvoeniya svobodnykh territorii. Kniga 3. – M.: STRELKA MAG, 2019. – 296 s. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293730/4293730324.pdf
Further reading
- Evraziiskaya premiya 2018/ Eurasian Prize 2018: Winners book/ Orgkomitet Mezhdunarodnogo konkursa arkhitektury i dizaina «Evraziiskaya Premiya» i Sammita arkhitektorov, urbanistov, dizainerov «ArkhEvraziya». – Ekaterinburg: Le Tabouret, 2018. – 162 s. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/5530.rar
- Gradostroitel'stvo i planirovka naselennykh mest / pod red. Konokotina N.G. –M.: KolosS, 2012. – 398 s. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/2375.rar
