Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

History and Basics of Urban Planning

Feoktistova Elena Alexandrovna

Description: The discipline covers the design principles of urban planning systems of different hierarchical levels in the historical context, the evolution of approaches to architectural, functional-planning, aesthetic organisation of settlements and modern trends in urban planning.

Amount of credits: 5

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures	30
Practical works	15
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	The examination takes place in a complex form: - test questions; written answers to 2 questions (mandatory with sketches, diagrams, plans, etc. ) followed by oral commentary.

Component: Component by selection

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal

To acquire historical, theoretical and practical knowledge of urban planning at different territorial levels during the evolution of settlements.

Objective

developing the student's urban planning outlook, aiming to understand the spatial organisation of the living environment, including at different historical periods;
Introducing students to the nature of the research tasks faced by The design engineer's role in solving urban planning problems;
The study of the social, technical, economic and architectural aspects of modern urban development;
Identifying the main trends in the process of urban formation;
Understanding the patterns of evolutionary processes in urban planning, determined by changes in the socio-economic structure of society;
Learning the basic techniques for organising urban spaces in different socio-economic and historical contexts.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

Identify the historical stages, prerequisites for development and factors of urban culture in different historical periods historical periods;

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

relate the main provisions and tasks of urban planning analysis tackled in contemporary urban planning theory and practice;

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

Еxplain the characteristics of the development and functioning of urban planning systems;
Make judgements, evaluate ideas and draw conclusions on specific professional issues in the history and fundamentals of urban planning;

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

Discuss and present material in the professional field;

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

Synthesise data from the functional-spatial and compositional analysis of urban planning systems at different hierarchical levels;
Have research skills in collecting, analysing and systematising data on the development and functioning of urban planning systems.

Teaching methods

- Traditional lectures and practical classes with the inclusion of innovative educational technologies; - Interactive lecture (application of the following active forms of learning: guided (discussion or conversation; presentation of slides or educational films); - Exploration and research activities (independent research activities of students in the learning process). activities (independent research activities of students in the learning process).

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Practical work: Analytical table	0-100
	Control 1
	Article (introduction, list of sources, structure)
	Rating control 1
	Summary of the lectures
2 rating	Control 2	0-100
	Practical work:The planning and functional structure
	The report
	Presentation
	Article
	Rating control 2
Total control	Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
The exam takes place in a comprehensive form: - test questions; written answers to 2 questions (necessarily with sketches, diagrams, plans, etc.) followed by an oral comment.	1. At least 90% of the correct answers to the test questions. 2. Logical and competent written presentation of a theoretical question with competent use of professional terminology. The disclosure of the topic of the question is at least 90%. 3. Accompanying the entire text of the theoretical question with explanatory drawings and diagrams. 4. When answering questions, competent reasoned answers are given using professional terminology.	1. Correct answers to test questions from 70 to 89%. 2. A logical and fairly competent written presentation of the theoretical question with minor inaccuracies. Competent use of professional terminology with minor errors. The disclosure of the topic of the question is at least 70%. 3. The text of the theoretical question is accompanied by basic explanatory drawings and diagrams, with small errors. 4. When answering questions, mostly competent, reasoned, but incomplete answers are given using professional terminology.	1. Correct answers to test questions from 50 to 69%. 2. An insufficiently logical and competent written presentation of the theoretical question. The use of professional terminology with errors. The disclosure of the topic of the question is at least 50%. 3. Accompanying the text of the theoretical question with some explanatory drawings and diagrams. 4. When answering questions, the student correctly understands the essence of the question, but in the answer there are separate problems in comprehending the questions of the course, which do not prevent further assimilation of the program material.	1. At least 90% of the correct answers to the test questions. 2. Logical and competent written presentation of a theoretical question with competent use of professional terminology. The disclosure of the topic of the question is at least 90%. 3. Accompanying the entire text of the theoretical question with explanatory drawings and diagrams. 4. When answering questions, competent reasoned answers are given using professional terminology.
Practical work	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are completed correctly; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are creatively used.	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 70 to 89% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are performed correctly, but may contain minor errors that can be easily corrected; - the aesthetics of the design of the work is at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 50 to 69% in accordance with the task; - some tasks are not completed correctly (but not more than 50%), they may contain errors that can be corrected; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are completed correctly; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are creatively used.
Article	- compliance with the topic and its full disclosure; - logical presentation and evidence-based conclusions; - design of the text and sources in accordance with the requirements; - the originality of the text according to the anti-plagiarism system is at least 80%.	- compliance with the topic and its insufficiently full disclosure; - the logic of the presentation is slightly violated or one of the conclusions has not been proven; - the design of the text and sources in accordance with the requirements, there may be minor imperfections4 - the originality of the text according to the anti-plagiarism system is at least 70%.	- compliance with the topic and its insufficiently full disclosure; - the logic of the presentation is violated and the evidence of one of the conclusions is missing; - the design of the text and sources in accordance with the requirements, there may be defects that do not violate copyrights; - the originality of the text according to the anti-plagiarism system is at least 60%.	- compliance with the topic and its full disclosure; - logical presentation and evidence-based conclusions; - design of the text and sources in accordance with the requirements; - the originality of the text according to the anti-plagiarism system is at least 80%.
Control work	Сorrect completion of at least 90% of tasks.	Correct completion of 70 to 89% of tasks	Correct completion of 50 to 69% of tasks	Сorrect completion of at least 90% of tasks.
Presentation with a report	- logical structure with informative illustrative material; - expressive, competent speech using professional terminology; - aesthetics of presentation design at a high level.	- a logical structure with illustrative material that does not fully reflect the topic; - insufficiently expressive, but competent speech using professional terminology; - the aesthetics of the presentation design is at a good level.	- the structure of the presentation is devoid of logic, the illustrative material does not fully reflect the topic; - insufficiently expressive speech, with minor errors in the use of professional terminology; - aesthetics of presentation design at a satisfactory level.	- logical structure with informative illustrative material; - expressive, competent speech using professional terminology; - aesthetics of presentation design at a high level.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of lectures

The structure and object of urban planning
General characteristics and characteristics of urban planning in the ancient world (factors, typology of settlements, planning and functional structure, building techniques)
Urban planning in medieval Europe and the East
Town planning in Russia in the ancient and medieval periods
Urban planning in Europe and Russia in the 16th and 18th centuries
Western European and American urban planning in the 19th and early 20th centuries
Main trends in the theory and practice of urban planning in the 1920s and 1930s
Typology of urban planning objects
The concept of district planning
The architectural and planning structure and functional organisation of the city
Structure of the residential area
Location and structure of industrial areas
The urban community centre
Urban public transport
Compositional analysis of urban planning

Key reading

Kozlov M.V. Teoriya gradostroitel'stva: ucheb. posobie / M. V. Kozlov ; MOiN RK, VKGTU im. D. Serikbaeva. - Ust'-Kamenogorsk: VKGTU, 2011. - 171 p.
Deniel Bruk. Istoriya gorodov budushchego. Per.s angl.D.Sianovskij. – M.: Strelka Press. – 436 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/4084.rar
Ospankyzy A., Musabaev T., Kushenov A. Osnovnye aspekty territorial'nogo planirovaniya Respubliki Kazahstan. Izdatel' LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing- 2013. - 43 p.
Luchkova V.I. Istoriya gradostroitel'stva doindustrial'nogo perioda. Lekcionnyj kurs/ V.I.Luchkova, 2018. - [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://pnu.edu.ru/media/filer_public/a0/7c/a07cec34-4e2e-458f-b5c0-f0d99bc142f7/07.pdf
Goroda srednevekovyh imperij Dal'nego Vostoka / otv. red. N.N. Kradin; In-t istorii, arheologii i etnografii narodov Dal'nego Vostoka DVO RAN. - M. : IVL, 2018. - 367 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/4852.rar
Goroda, upravlyaemye dannymi. Ot koncepcii do prikladnyh reshenij PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers). 2016. – 88 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/3596.rar
Gradostroitelstvo i planirovka naselennyh mest / pod red. Konokotin N.G. –M.: KolosS, 2012. – 398 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/2375.rar

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan