Culture Studies
Description: In the 20th century, humanitarian theory realized the need for a comprehensive study of man and phenomena of his life, primarily culture. The growth of national identity, as an element of growing local diversity, dictates a new set of subordination of cultures. In the new type of society, the need for a systematic analysis of culture as a sphere of state policy with well-founded management decisions is formed.
Amount of credits: 2
Пререквизиты:
- Человек. Общество. Право. Школьный курс
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | 15 |
Practical works | 15 |
Laboratory works | |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 15 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 15 |
Form of final control | Exam |
Final assessment method | written (by tickets) |
Component: Mandatory component
Cycle: Secondary disciplines
Goal
- Formation of social and humanitarian outlook of students in the context of solving the tasks of modernization of the public consciousness, defined by the state program "Vision in the future: modernization of public consciousness.
Objective
- - students learn basic sources and methods of obtaining cultural information; - inculcating the skills of using the knowledge acquired in the process of mastering cultural studies in professional activities. - formation of critical thinking skills and the ability to apply it in practice
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- demonstrate a systematic understanding of the main methods of cultural analysis in the study of different spheres of culture;
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- based on the learned knowledge of culturology, to show understanding of culture on the basis of their professional ideas and skills.
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- -critically analyze, evaluate and synthesize cultural processes taking place at the country, regional, city level, etc. - to analyze the peculiarities of cultural institutions in the context of their role in the modernization of kazakhstani society.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- - use modern technology and information technologies to solve communication problems.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- - to assess the specific situation of relations in the society from the standpoint of a particular science of social and humanitarian type, to design the prospects еѐ development taking into account possible risks; - to develop programs for solving conflict situations in society, including in professional society.
Teaching methods
The following educational technologies are used during the training sessions: - interactive lecture (application of the following active forms of training: Guided (guided) discussion or conversation; moderation; demonstration of slides or training films; brainstorming; motivational speech); - creation of scenarios for the development of different situations based on the given conditions; - information and communication (e.g. computer class classes using professional application packages); - research (independant research activities of students during training); - solving educational tasks.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | seminars | 0-100 |
Independent work | ||
milestone testing | ||
2 rating | seminars | 0-100 |
Independent work | ||
milestone testing | ||
Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
written survey | Correct and complete answers to all theoretical questions are given; The material is presented competently in accordance with a logical sequence; Creative abilities are demonstrated. | Correct but incomplete answers to all theoretical questions have been given, insignificant errors or inaccuracies have been made; The practical task has been completed, but a minor error has been made; The material is presented competently in accordance with the logical sequence. | The answers to theoretical questions are correct in principle, but incomplete, inaccuracies in wording and logical errors are allowed; The practical task is not fully completed; The material is presented competently, but the logical sequence is broken. | Correct and complete answers to all theoretical questions are given; The material is presented competently in accordance with a logical sequence; Creative abilities are demonstrated. |
oral survey | Correct and complete answers to all theoretical questions are given; The material is presented competently in accordance with a logical sequence; Creative abilities are demonstrated. | Correct but incomplete answers to all theoretical questions have been given, insignificant errors or inaccuracies have been made; The practical task has been completed, but a minor error has been made; The material is presented competently in accordance with the logical sequence. | The answers to theoretical questions are correct in principle, but incomplete, inaccuracies in wording and logical errors are allowed; The practical task is not fully completed; The material is presented competently, but the logical sequence is broken. | Correct and complete answers to all theoretical questions are given; The material is presented competently in accordance with a logical sequence; Creative abilities are demonstrated. |
testing | they contain 90-100 % correct answers to the questions | they contain 70-89% of correct answers to questions | they contain 50-69% of correct answers to questions | they contain 90-100 % correct answers to the questions |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Morphology of culture
- Language of culture
- Semiotics of culture
- Anatomy of culture
- Culture of the nomads of Kazakhstan
- Cultural heritage of prototurk
- Medieval Culture Of Central Asia
- Cultural heritage of the Turks
- Formation of Kazakh culture
- Kazakh culture at the turn of the XVIII - the end of XIX centuries The phenomenon of the Kazakh Enlightenment
- Kazakh culture of the 20th century
- Kazakh culture in the context of modern world processes
- Culture of the nations of the world
- Culture of ethnic groups of Kazakhstan
- State program "Cultural Heritage"
Key reading
- 1. Nazarbaev N.A. «Vzglyad v budushchee: modernizatsiya obshchestvennogo soznaniya». – Astana, Ak Orda, 2017 / http://www.akorda.kz/ru 2. Nazarbaev N.A. «Vzglyad v budushchee». – Astana, 2017. 3. Gabitov T.Kh. Kul'turologiya/ KazNU, Almaty, 2019 4. Barnard Alan. «Antropologiya tarikhy men teoriyasy»/per. na kaz.yaz. Pod rukov. Kul'sarieva A.T., Masalimova A.R. – A., 2017. 5. Moltobarova K.I. «Mәdeniettanu». - A, 2018. 6. Yurii Lotman “Semiosphera” , Almaty: Ұlttyқ audarma byurosy, 2019. Yanson Tore “The history of Language” , Almaty: Ұlttyқ audarma byurosy, 2019. 7. Gombrikh Ernst “The History of Art” , Almaty: Ұlttyқ audarma byurosy, 2019. 8. Klaus Shvab «Tөrtіnshі industriyalyқ revolyutsiya» (The Fourth Industrial Revolution). – Almaty: Ұlttyқ audarma byurosy, 2018. – 200 b. 9. Svetlana Ter-Minasova «Tіl zhәne mәdenietaralyқ kommunikatsiya» (Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya). – Almaty: Ұlttyқ audarma byurosy, 2018. – 320 b. 10. Patrisiya Uolleis «Internet psikhologiyasy», (Psychology the internet) Almaty, 2019, - 392 b. 11. Pinker Stiven «Tіl – instinkt», (The Language instinct), Almaty, 2019 – 576 b. 12. Li Enn Pek, Gai S. Ril “Media etics at works”, Almaty: Ұlttyқ audarma byurosy, 2019.
Further reading
- 1. «Vseobshchaya istoriya zhivopisi». – M., EKSMO, 2010. 2. «Al'-Farabi sotsial'no-eticheskie traktaty». – Alma-Ata, 1972. 3. Ғabitov T.Kh. «Қazaқ mәdenietіnің tarikhy: oқu құraly». – Almaty: Қazaқ universitetі, 2016. Gabitov T.Kh., Mutalipov Zh., Kulsarieva A. «Kul'turologiya». - Almaty, Raritet, 2008. 4. Kurmangalieva G.K., Nysanbaev A.N., Solov'eva G.G., Seitakhmetova L.N. «Nasledie al'-Farabi i sovremennaya filosofiya vzaimoponimaniya». – Almaty. 2011 5. Nurzhanov B.G., Erzhanova A.M. «Kul'turologiya». - Almaty, 2011. 6. Kradin N.N. Kochevniki Evrazii, Almaty, 2007 7. Beisenova G.A. «Problemy globalizatsii i identichnosti» – A., Print, 2009. 8. Beisenova G.A. «Problemy obrazovatel'nogo znaniya v dispozitive kul'tury». – Almaty: Iskander, 2005. 9. Gabitov T.Kh. «Kazakhi: Opyt kul'turologicheskogo analiza». – Saarbr'cken: Germany Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. Kg lap lambert. - Heinrich-Btscking-Str. 6-8, 66121. - KG LAP LAMBERT, GERMANIYa, 2012. 10. Gabitov T.Kh., Abdigalieva G.K., Ismagambetova Z.N. «Filosofiya kul'tury»: Uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov i kolledzhei. – Almaty: Evero, 2013 11. Ғabitov T.Kh., Zatov Қ. «Қazaқ mәdenietіnің rukhani keңіstіgі». - Almaty: Raritet, 2013. 12. Tursun Gabitov. «Actual Problems of Kazakh Culture. Kazakh Culture Challenges». - Saarbryuken: Lambert. - Publishing, 2016. 13. Gorbatov A.V., Mikhailov Yu.I. «Drevnie tsivilizatsii». - M., 2009. 14. Balasaguni Yu. «Blagodatnoe znanie / per. S.N. Ivanova». – M., 1983. 15. Zholdubaeva A.K. «Kul'turologiya: praktikum». - Almaty: Kaznu im.al'-Farabi, 2014. 16. «Istoriya kul'turologii pod red. Ogurtsova A.P». - M., Gardariki, 2006. 17. Kairzhanova A. Palaeoturcica. «Mir drevnikh tyurkov». – Almaty, 1999. 18. Aқatai S.N. Drevnie kul'ty i traditsionnaya kul'tura kazakhskogo 19. naroda: monografiya; Tarikhi maқalalar. Қaita basylғan. 20. – Almaty, 2011. – 424-b. 21. Kondybaev S. Vvedenie v kazakhskuyu mifologiyu. – Almaty. 1999. 22. Malov S.E. «Pamyatniki drevnetyurkskoi pis'mennosti». – M-L, 1951. 23. Margulan A. «Begazy-dandybaevskaya kul'tura Tsentral'nogo Kazakhstana». - Alma- Ata, 1979. 24. Masalimova A.R. «Kul'tura i tsivilizatsiya». – A., 2005. 25. Makhmud al'-Kashgari «Divani Lugat at-Turk» / M. Auezova. – Almaty, 2005. 26. Mirzabekova A.Sh. «Problema kul'turnoi identichnosti v sotsial'noi filosofii». – Karagandy: Bolashak-Baspa, 2006. 27. «Mir tsennostei al'-Farabi i aksiologiya KhKhI veka». Kniga.2. – Almaty, 2006. 28. Moldabekov Zh.Zh. «Қazaқtanu». - Almaty, 2015. 29. «Nasledie al'-Farabi i formirovanie novogo integral'nogo mirovozzreniya.kollektivnaya monografiya»./ pod obshchei redaktsiei Z.K. Shaukenova. – Almaty: 2012. 30. Nikonov A.Yu. «Alutun bilig. Tengrianstvo». – Almaty. 2000. 31. Nurzhanov B.G. «Modern. Postmodern. Kul'tura». – Almaty, 2012. 32. Il'ina E.A., Burov M.E. Kul'turologiya: Konspekt lektsii. - M.; MIEMP, 2005. – 104 str. 33. Timoshinov V.I. Kul'turologiya:Kazakhstan-Evraziya-Vostok-Zapad/Almaty, 2003