Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Pre-Project Analysis

Feoktistova Elena Alexandrovna

Description: An in-depth theoretical and practical study of the diploma project's topic, including: studying the methods of pre-project analysis; formulating the purpose and objectives of the diploma project; analysis of domestic and foreign experience; study of regulatory requirements; compiling a socio-functional programme. The result of mastering of the discipline: prepared, analyzed and systematized complex materials on the theme of the diploma project.

Amount of credits: 5

Пререквизиты:

Architectural Design VI

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	45
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	The examination takes the form of a creative clause with individual assignments on the subject of the diploma project.

Component: University component

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal

Students learn a complex set of methods of pre-project analysis in the design of architectural and urban planning objects.

Objective

The study of contemporary problems solved in one of the fields of architectural and urban planning;
Justification of the relevance of the design of the architectural and urban planning object in contemporary socio-economic conditions;
Study the methodology for a comprehensive pre-project analysis of the area and the design object;
Analysis of domestic and foreign experience in designing a facility in accordance with the topic of the diploma project;
The student will learn how to search for and systematise materials on the topic of the diploma project;
Gaining skills to develop a socio-functional programme the design of architectural and urban planning objects.
The design of the architecture, planning and function model of the graduation project.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

Name, describe and discuss the current challenges of architecture and urban planning The Republic of Kazakhstan in the new socio-economic conditions;

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

Develop a socio-functional design programme;
Use domestic and foreign design experience in modern practice;
Describe and apply the main methods of architectural and urban studies;
Develop an architectural and planning assignment;

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

Conduct pre-project analysis independently and justify their project proposals;
Define the tasks of pre-project studies in the design of architectural and urban planning objects;
To operate with the requirements and knowledge of methodological bases in the analysis of the spatial and planning structure of urban and architectural objects;

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

To present, design and discuss in the professional community the findings of pre-project studies in the field of urban planning and architecture;

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

Integrate diverse forms of knowledge when developing project solutions, coordinating interdisciplinary objectives.

Teaching methods

The traditional practical exercises are explained and carried out;

innovative technologies.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Report: Formulation of research topic, relevance (Introduction).	0-100
	Report: Structure of the study
	Report: Bibliography
	Practical work: Analogue analysis
	Report: Historical overview (1st section of the abstract)
2 rating	Report: Main sections of the abstract	0-100
	Practical work: Energy-efficient design techniques
	Practical work: Social and functional programme
	Practical work: Graphic design of materials (tables, analogues, supplementary diagrams according to the topic)
	Practical work: Composition
Total control	Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
The exam takes place in the form of a creative clausura with an individual assignment on the subject of the graduation project.	1. The work fully corresponds to the assignment, as well as the subject of the diploma design and is presented in full. 2. The degree of elaboration of the elements is at least 90%. 3. Competent implementation of all elements in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations, as well as educational, methodological and scientific literature. 4. The creativity of the project model and its compliance with the typological image. 5. Aesthetics of the design of the work at a high and good level.	1. The work corresponds to the task, as well as to the subject of the diploma design, but is not presented in full, but at least 80% of the elements. 2. The degree of elaboration of the elements is at least 70%. 3. The execution of no more than 20% of the elements may contain errors with minor violations of regulatory requirements and recommendations. 4. The project model is sufficiently creative and generally corresponds to the typological image. 5. The aesthetics of the design of the work is not below a good level.	1. The work corresponds to the task, as well as the subject of the diploma design, but is not presented in full, but at least 70% of the elements. 2. The degree of elaboration of the elements is at least 60%. 3. The execution of no more than 30% of the elements may contain errors with minor violations of regulatory requirements and recommendations. 4. The design model is typical and generally corresponds to the typological image. 5. Aesthetics of the design of the work at a level not lower than satisfactory.	1. The work fully corresponds to the assignment, as well as the subject of the diploma design and is presented in full. 2. The degree of elaboration of the elements is at least 90%. 3. Competent implementation of all elements in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations, as well as educational, methodological and scientific literature. 4. The creativity of the project model and its compliance with the typological image. 5. Aesthetics of the design of the work at a high and good level.
Practical work	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are completed correctly; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are creatively used.	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 70 to 89% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are performed correctly, but may contain minor errors that can be easily corrected; - the aesthetics of the design of the work is at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 50 to 69% in accordance with the task; - some tasks are not completed correctly (but not more than 50%), they may contain errors that can be corrected; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are completed correctly; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are creatively used.
Report	All the requirements for writing an abstract have been met. The content of the topic is fully disclosed in accordance with the chosen topic, there are reasonable conclusions for each section; the work is framed correctly, there are insignificant stylistic errors; the work is done independently, all the selected literature is relevant, analyzed and used in the work. The volume is maintained, the requirements for external design are met.	The basic requirements for the abstract are fulfilled, but there are shortcomings. The content of the work mostly corresponds to the topic, the conclusions mostly correspond to the content of the section; the work is mostly framed correctly, there are some insignificant stylistic and grammatical errors; the work was performed independently, not all the literature used is relevant. The volume may be overstated or underestimated, but not by more than 10%.	There are significant deviations from the requirements for the abstract. The content of the work partially corresponds to the topic, conclusions are not drawn for all sections of the work or partially correspond to the content of the section; the work is mostly framed correctly, there are some significant stylistic and grammatical errors; the work was performed independently, mostly not relevant or inappropriate literature was used. The volume may be overstated or underestimated, but not by more than 20%.	All the requirements for writing an abstract have been met. The content of the topic is fully disclosed in accordance with the chosen topic, there are reasonable conclusions for each section; the work is framed correctly, there are insignificant stylistic errors; the work is done independently, all the selected literature is relevant, analyzed and used in the work. The volume is maintained, the requirements for external design are met.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

The aims and objectives of pre-project analysis in the design of various objects
The subject of pre-project analysis and its place in the architectural design process
Pre-project analysis and assessment of the existing situation
Systematisation and urban pre-project analysis of the analogues of various architectural and urban planning objects
Systematisation and functional analysis of the design object
Systematisation, architectural and planning analysis and structural design object
Typological analysis of the design object
Specific features of pre-project analysis of various architectural and urban planning objects (residential and public buildings, urban planning formations, landscape objects)
Pre-project analysis for design in cities with historical heritage
The socio-functional design programme
Pre-project site analysis in the design of architectural and urban development projects
Drawing up a design brief for the project

Key reading

Svod principov kompleksnogo razvitiya gorodskih territorij. Kniga 1. – M.: STRELKA MAG, 2019. – 296 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://storage.strategy24.ru/files/news/202011/f5e0259188e448256fc204402df4df4c.pdf
Standart razvitiya zastroennyh territorij. Kniga 2. – M.: STRELKA MAG, 2019. – 234 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293730/4293730325.pdf
Standart osvoeniya svobodnyh territorij. Kniga 3. – M.: STRELKA MAG, 2019. – 296 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293730/4293730324.pdf
Evrazijskaya premiya 2018/ Eurasian Prize 2018: Winners book/ Orgkomitet Mezhdunarodnogo konkursa arhitektury i dizajna «Evrazijskaya Premiya» i Sammita arhitektorov, urbanistov, dizajnerov «ArhEvraziya». – Ekaterinburg: Le Tabouret, 2018. – 162 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/5530.rar
Gradostroitel'stvo i planirovka naselennyh mest / pod red. Konokotina N.G. –M.: KolosS, 2012. – 398 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/2375.rar
KAZGOR. Proekty. - Almaty: Izdatel'stvo "Basbagan", 2019. - 368 р.

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan