Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Undergraduate Project

Feoktistova Elena Alexandrovna

Description: General theoretical and practical aspects of the design of architectural and urban planning objects on the topic of the graduation project in specific conditions for a real situation with a different functional and planning structure. The discipline includes two sections - research and design, revealing the author's concept of the draft concept of an architectural object and is aimed at determining the student's readiness for independent creative work on a graduation project.

Amount of credits: 7

Пререквизиты:

Architectural Design VI

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	75
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	105
Course Project
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	Creative Examination - Clauzura

Component: Component by selection

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal

to determine the readiness of a student for independent creative work on a graduation project, expressed in the form of a graphic and layout architectural concept.

Objective

to master a full-scale survey of the place of the proposed location of the object with photographic fixation of characteristic features;
to master the historical and genetic analysis aimed at identifying continuity and identifying the development of the object;
to form a design and search solution focused on the development of a design concept for a real situation on the topic of a graduation project;
define the structure of the object at the model level.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

perform an alternative search for options for architectural and planning solutions for an object on the topic of graduation design;

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

apply a systematic approach to the social and functional organization of the object;

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

to systematize architectural and planning techniques and tools on the subject of design;
solve and analyze project tasks

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

justify design decisions with reason;

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

develop an architectural and planning solution for a design object based on a pre-project analysis, a socio-functional program, typological features, regulatory requirements and an environmental approach.

Teaching methods

introductions, talks, slides and visual aids;

natural survey of the territory;

independent research of students in the learning process;

solving educational problems.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Social and functional program	0-100
	Klauzura on the image
	Selection and analysis of the territory
2 rating	Project elements	0-100
	Project elements
	Project elements
Total control	Exam, Course Project	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Practical lessons	- completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creativ	- completion of work on time and in the amount of 70 to 89% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly, but may contain minor errors that can be easily corrected by correction; - aesthetics of work design at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work not on time and in the amount of 50 to 69% in accordance with the task; - some tasks were completed incorrectly (but not more than 50%), may contain errors that can be corrected; - aesthetics of work design at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creativ
Creative Examination - Clauzura	The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%.	The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered in full. The arrangement of clause elements with a slight violation of scale and compositional integrity. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is slightly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a good level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 70 to 89%.	The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered to a greater extent. The arrangement of the elements of the clause has violations of scale and compositional integrity, and the depth of elaboration is insufficient. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is significantly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a satisfactory level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 50 to 69%.	The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

Formulation of the problem on the topic of the graduation project
Development of a socio-functional program for the design object
Choice and analysis of the town-planning situation
Volumetric klauzura on the image of the object on the topic of the graduation project
Graphic klauzura on the functional structure of an object
Variant development of the object on the topic of the graduation project
Development of the concept of planning solution
Formation of the architectural image of the object
Development of project elements
Development of project elements
Development of project elements
Preparing a project for evaluation

Key reading

Kozlov M.V. Teoriya gradostroitel'stva: Uchebnoe posobie. (2-e izdanie, dopolnennoe). - Almaty, 2021. - 182s.
Krasheninnikov A.V. Stsenarnoe proektirovanie gorodskoi sredy // Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. – 2017. – №4(41). – S. 242-256 [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://marhi.ru/AMIT/2017/4kvart17/18_krasheninnikov/index.php (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2022).
KAZGOR. Proekty. – Almaty: Izdatel'stvo «Basbaqan», 2019. – 368 s.
Gradostroitel'stvo i planirovka naselennykh mest / pod red. Konokotina N.G. –M.: KolosS, 2012. – 398 s. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/2375.rar

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan