Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Architectural Design II

Bukhantseva Anna Evgenyevna

Description: The principles of design of one of the types of residential structures - an individual residential house - are considered. Design methodology, all basic stages are mastered: sketch-idea, social and functional analysis, creative search, constructive solution, color and graphic presentation. Different constructive solutions, international experience in the design of an individual residential house are studied.

Amount of credits: 5

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	45
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Course Project
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	Creative examination in the form of a graphic clause.

Component: University component

Cycle: Base disciplines

Goal

To master a set of modern methods of design of one of the types of low-rise housing - an individual house with a plot.

Objective

- mastering the principles of placement of the object on the allotted plot; - study of domestic and world experience in designing similar objects; - study of the design features of the object; - study of socio-demographic factors in the formation of individual housing.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

Understand the basic methods of designing a single-family residential homestead.

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

Apply the acquired knowledge and skills in the independent design of architectural objects.

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

To form professional judgments in the area of experience sharing and professional evaluation of design solutions.

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

Critically evaluate the design solutions of similar objects in architectural practice.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

To collect, analyze and systematize knowledge and skills acquired to solve professional problems in studies and project activities.

Teaching methods

- problem lecture; - interactive lecture (application of the following active forms of learning: guided (guided) discussion or conversation); - experimental and empirical methods of creativity; - individual independent approach to work.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Completion of the search for an idea. Approval.	0-100
	Development of project elements to scale.
	Development of the structural section
2 rating	Fulfilling the Perspective	0-100
	Search for architectural methods of revealing three-dimensional form.
	Architectural presentation of the project.
Total control	Exam, Course Project	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Practical work	- everything in the work stage, clause, working and final stages are done correctly; - the quality of work design is of a high standard; - previously acquired skills are reasonably applied.	- all tasks are completed at a good level, but may contain errors that can be easily corrected; - the quality of work design is at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are applied at an average level.	- some of the tasks are performed incorrectly, may contain gross errors; - the quality of work design is at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are applied at a satisfactory level.	- everything in the work stage, clause, working and final stages are done correctly; - the quality of work design is of a high standard; - previously acquired skills are reasonably applied.
course project	1.The structure and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment 2. All elements of the project are performed at a high level, in accordance with regulatory requirements. Properly solved urban planning issues of designing an individual residential house. 3. Graphic presentation of the project of individual residential building is made at a high artistic level.	1. The structure and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. 2. The project is made in accordance with the norms and requirements. There may be minor violations eliminated when adjusting the project. 3. Graphic presentation of the project of an individual residential house is made at an average artistic level.	1. The structure and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. 2. The project is executed with large violations of regulatory requirements. 3.Graphic presentation of the project is performed at a satisfactory artistic level	1.The structure and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment 2. All elements of the project are performed at a high level, in accordance with regulatory requirements. Properly solved urban planning issues of designing an individual residential house. 3. Graphic presentation of the project of individual residential building is made at a high artistic level.
The exam	The work is performed in accordance with the assignment. -The layout of all elements of the assignment is performed at a high graphic level and corresponds to the proposed concept; -development of plans, facades, cross-sections is done taking into account all the necessary requirements and technologies; -Presentation of the "clause" is done competently in accordance with the proposed concept at a high graphic level.	The work is completed in accordance with the assignment. - the layout of all elements of the assignment is performed at a good graphic level and corresponds to the proposed concept; - development of plans, facades, sections is done with minor errors, taking into account all necessary requirements and technologies; - presentation of the "clause" is done competently in accordance with the proposed concept at a high graphic level.	The work is performed in accordance with the assignment. -The layout of all elements was done without taking into account the previously acquired knowledge; - development of plans, facades, sections is made with serious remarks, without taking into account certain requirements and technologies; - presentation of the "clause" is made at a low graphic level.	The work is performed in accordance with the assignment. -The layout of all elements of the assignment is performed at a high graphic level and corresponds to the proposed concept; -development of plans, facades, cross-sections is done taking into account all the necessary requirements and technologies; -Presentation of the "clause" is done competently in accordance with the proposed concept at a high graphic level.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

Introductory talk
Assignment Clause 4-5 options for the volumetric and spatial composition of the object in the layout
Choosing the best option
Sketch of a master plan of the site
Development of project elements
The development of compositional solutions to the facades - the main and side
Execution of project elements on a scale of 1:100, 1:200
Making a structural section of the form on a scale
Working layout
Composition of the layout, options, approval of the layout sketch
Drawing the elements of the project in accordance with the approved composition of the layout
Drawing out the project, detailing, inscriptions, dimensions, stamping, entourage
Execution of architectural presentation by graphic methods of drawing and revealing the volume (color - washing, tamping, line, shading
Departmental review

Key reading

Lisitsian M.V. Arkhitekturnoe proektirovanie zhilykh zdanii. Izdatel'stvo: Arkhitektura-S, 2016 g.-488 s..[Elektronnyiresurs]Rezhimdostupa:https://www.labirint.ru/books/266266/
Matekhina O.V. Osnovy arkhitekturnogo proektirovaniya: ucheb.posobie – Novokuznetsk: Izd.tsentr SibGIU, 2014. – 296 s. [Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: file:///D:/Downloads/30110_175bbdf092a7b5e9363120f61d85f6b7.pdf
Valeev K.Ya. Osnovy arkhitekturnogo proektirovaniya. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie dlya studentov, – Ufa: BGPU im. M. Akmully, 2020, - 51 s.[Elektronnyi resurs].- Rezhimdostupa:https://bspu.ru/tpl/sveden/files/education/RPD/FOS/metod_mat6_54.03.01_dis_ds_fgos3+.pdf

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan