Automatics and Automation

Kadyroldina Albina Talapzhanovna

The instructor profile

Description: The discipline is aimed at the formation of knowledge about the element base of means of automatic and automated process control systems, varieties of primary and secondary devices: the basic principles of control, the structure of the control system, the problem of stability and quality of control of closed systems, the basic laws of control.

Amount of credits: 5

Пререквизиты:

  • Physics

Course Workload:

Types of classes hours
Lectures 30
Practical works 15
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) 30
SAW (Student autonomous work) 75
Form of final control Exam
Final assessment method

Component: Component by selection

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal
  • Preparation of the student for professional activity in the field of production of building materials
Objective
  • Formation of students ' competencies in the construction and operation of automatic control systems in the field of building materials.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
  • Knowledge and understanding of: - management principles; - the structure of control systems; - the principles of measuring temperature, pressure, level, flow. - Application of knowledge and understanding: - methods of obtaining and transmitting measurement information; - principles of building automation systems; - possess the skills of developing and using project documentation on automation. - Formation of judgments: - be able to show personal responsibility, commitment to professional ethics and standards of professional activity. - Communication skills: - clearly state and defend the results of complex engineering activities in the field of automation. - The ability to independently apply methods and means of cognition, training and self-control, to realize the prospects of intellectual, cultural, moral, physical and professional self-development and self-improvement
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
  • Способность применять специальные знания и понимания в области автоматизации в комплексной инженерной деятельности на основе целостной системы научных знаний.
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
  • Способность самостоятельно применять методы и средства познания, обучения и самоконтроля, осознавать перспективность интеллектуального, культурного, нравственного, физического и профессионального саморазвития и самосовершенствования, уметь критически оценивать свои достоинства и недостатки.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
  • Способность эффективно работать индивидуально и в качестве члена команды, демонстрируя навыки руководства отдельными группами исполнителей, в том числе над междисциплинарными проектами.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
  • Осуществлять коммуникации в профессиональной среде и в обществе в целом, анализировать существующую и разрабатывать самостоятельно техническую документацию; четко излагать и защищать результаты комплексной инженерной деятельности.
Teaching methods

15. Symbols of devices and automation tools.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period Type of task Total
1  rating 0-100
2  rating 0-100
Total control Exam 0-100
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task 90-100 70-89 50-69 0-49
Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

  • 40% of the examination result;
  • 60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6 MT1+MT2 +0,4E
2

 

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade Numerical value Points (%) Traditional grade
A 4.0 95-100 Excellent
A- 3.67 90-94
B+ 3.33 85-89 Good
B 3.0 80-84
B- 2.67 75-79
C+ 2.33 70-74
C 2.0 65-69 Satisfactory
C- 1.67 60-64
D+ 1.33 55-59
D 1.0 50-54
FX 0.5 25-49 Unsatisfactory
F 0 0-24
Topics of lectures
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 7
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Key reading
  • Гордеев А.С. Основы автоматики: учебное пособие для вузов. – Мичуринск: Изд-во МичГАУ, 2006.
  • Малафеев С.И., Малафеева А.А. Основы автоматики и системы автоматического управления: учебник для вузов. – М.: Академия, 2010.
  • Цикерман Л.Я., Берлинер М.А. и др. Автоматизация производственных процессов в дорожном строительстве. – М.: Транспорт, 1972. – 316 с.
  • Фрайден Дж. Современные датчики. Справочник. – М.: Техносфера, 2006. – 652 с.
  • Приборы и средства автоматизации. Каталог в 8-ми томах. – М.: Наутехлитиздат, 2003–2006.
Further reading
  • Пархоменко А., Починчук Н., Шипицин С. Автоматизированная система управления технологическим процессом производства бетонных смесей. СТА. – № 1. – 2005.
  • Беляков Р., Ефимов Ю., Наранов К. АСУ ТП бетонного завода. СТА. – № 3. – 2006.
  • Смирнов Ю. Система управления тепловлажностной обработкой железобетонных изделий. СТА. – № 1. – 2005.
  • Морозов В. Автоматизированная система обжига керамических изделий. СТА. – № 3. – 2006.
  • Свиязов А., Шишканов С. Система автоматизации автоклавной обработки силикатного кирпича. СТА. – № 1. – 2013.