HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Survey and Design of Highways

Bakirbaeva Anar Akylbaevna

Description: The discipline studies the basics of designing a route plan, longitudinal profile, transverse profiles of a highway, surveying and designing highways; intersections and junctions of highways; studying the features of design and survey work during road reconstruction, taking into account the influence of difficult natural conditions.

Amount of credits: 10

Пререквизиты:

Soil Mechanics

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures	45
Practical works	45
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	60
SAW (Student autonomous work)	150
Course Project
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	exam, course project

Component: University component

Cycle: Base disciplines

Goal

The purpose of the discipline is to study theoretical provisions and develop practical skills in the construction of highways of lower categories, taking into account difficult natural conditions, including linking this topic with the survey and design of highways;

Objective

Development of measures related to the survey and design of highways; intersections and junctions of highways; study of the features of design and survey work during road reconstruction;

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

The ability to apply basic and specialized knowledge in the field of technical sciences in complex engineering activities based on an integrated system of scientific knowledge about the environment.

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

The ability to master the new knowledge introduced, the ability to apply it at the implementation sites during design and survey work.

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

The ability to carry out feasibility studies of design solutions, perform organizational and planning calculations for the creation or reorganization of production sites, plan the work of personnel and payroll, apply advanced methods of operation of technological equipment.

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

The ability to work effectively individually and as a team member, demonstrating leadership skills for individual groups of performers, including on engineering projects, be able to show personal responsibility, commitment to professional ethics and standards of professional conduct.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

To communicate in the professional environment and in society as a whole, including in a foreign language; to analyze existing and independently develop technical documentation; to clearly state and defend the results of complex engineering activities and in industry scientific organizations.

Teaching methods

The following educational technologies are provided for during the training sessions: - Traditional technologies are provided for teaching: classroom classes and independent work of students. The lecture course is presented in multimedia form. When presenting the lecture material, motivational speech is used at the beginning and at the end of the lecture. Text, audio and video information, graphs, tables, etc. are used in the lecture presentation and practical classes.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Practical work No. 1	0-100
	Practical work No. 2
	Practical work No. 3
	Practical work No. 4
	Test paper - Rating 1
2 rating	Practical work No. 5	0-100
	Practical work No. 6
	Practical work No. 7
	Practical work No. 8
	Test paper - Rating 2
Total control	Exam, Course Project	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Interview on control issues.	- demonstrates system theoretical knowledge	- demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes insignificant mistakes that he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher;	- demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by a teacher;	- demonstrates system theoretical knowledge
Working in practical classes.	-completion of all planned practical work on time and in full. Registration of all practical work and protection to the teacher. Performing practical work in full compliance with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, drawings, drawings, graphs, calculations; correctly performs error analysis.	- freely navigates his completed practical work, explains the progress of the work performed, shows the sequence of calculations, but at the same time makes insignificant mistakes that he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher;	- demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by a teacher;	-completion of all planned practical work on time and in full. Registration of all practical work and protection to the teacher. Performing practical work in full compliance with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, drawings, drawings, graphs, calculations; correctly performs error analysis.
Lecture sessions.	- when studying lecture material, he demonstrates well in the survey, systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions	- demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge in lecture classes and, during a control survey, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes insignificant mistakes that he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher;	- during the control survey, shallow demonstrates weak theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by a teacher;	- when studying lecture material, he demonstrates well in the survey, systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions
Examination block.	- during the exam, he demonstrates systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, and gives an excellent answer to all three questions of the exam ticket.	- demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge at the exam, logically and consistently explains the essence of the proposed questions of the exam ticket, gives examples, shows fluency in topics;	- on the exam, he demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, but not less than 50% of the volume;	- during the exam, he demonstrates systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, and gives an excellent answer to all three questions of the exam ticket.
Course project	- the course project is performed in full, observing the necessary sequence of actions; correctly and neatly performs all notes, Tables, Figures, diagrams, graphs, calculations in the answer; correctly performs error analysis.	- the course project was completed according to the requirements for the assessment "5", but 2-3 shortcomings were made. The student's answer to the questions satisfies the basic requirements for answering 5, but is given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using links with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other disciplines;	- the course project was not completed completely, but at least 50% of the volume of practical work, which allows you to get the right results and conclusions; mistakes were made during the work.	- the course project is performed in full, observing the necessary sequence of actions; correctly and neatly performs all notes, Tables, Figures, diagrams, graphs, calculations in the answer; correctly performs error analysis.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of lectures

Introduction
Classification of highways
The interaction of the road and the car
The location of the road on the route plan
The longitudinal profile of the road
Transverse profiles of a highway
Features of highway design
The features of the surveys of the design of the reconstruction of the highway in plan, longitudinal and transverse profiles
Designing highways in permafrost areas
Designing highways in ravine areas and in karst areas
Distribution and types of saline soils
Designing highways in areas of shifting sands
Designing intersections and junctions
Intersections and junctions of highways at different levels

Key reading

1. Федотов Г.А., Поспелов П.И. Изыскание и проектирование автомобильных дорог. – М:, «Академия» 2018 г.- 465 с. 2. Горшков Н.Г. Изыскание и проектирование автомобильных дорог промышленного транспорта. –Белгород:, 2017 г. – 135 с. 3. СНиП РК 3.03-09-2006 Строительные нормы и правила. Автомобильные дороги, Астана 2007. 4. Методические рекомендации по проектированию жестких дорожных одежд . М.: Информавтодор, 2004. – 69 с. 5. СНиП РК 2.04-01-2001 «Строительная климатология» 6. СТ РК 1397 Требования к составу и оформлению проектной и рабочей документации. 7. Смирнова Т.Н. Общие требования к содержанию и оформлению учебно-методической литературы и других текстовых документов. У-Ка, ВКГТУ, 2002. 8. Б.Б. Каримов, Е.К. Салимбаев. Автомобильные дороги. Содружества Независимых Государств. М.: Интранедорнаука, 2006-264с

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan