Heat Technology Machinery

Baidildina Aizhan

The instructor profile

Description: Consideration of the list of equipment and its purpose. Types of thermal stations. Fundamentals of the laws of thermodynamics. Thermal cycles of steam turbine installations. Methods for calculating thermal schemes. Methods and means of measuring the automation of thermal processes. Designs of parts and assemblies. Installation and adjustment of equipment for heating networks and boiler plants.

Amount of credits: 6

Пререквизиты:

  • Steam generation units

Course Workload:

Types of classes hours
Lectures 30
Practical works 30
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) 30
SAW (Student autonomous work) 90
Form of final control Exam
Final assessment method

Component: University component

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal
  • obtaining knowledge about the purpose, scope, design and arrangement of equipment used in the heat engineering industry.
Objective
  • general information about typical designs of heat engineering equipment
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
  • Know the basic requirements for equipment, classification of thermal equipment
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
  • Possess knowledge in the field of application of equipment for thermal power plants and industrial enterprises
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
  • Понимать и использовать знания по дисциплине при освоении основной профессиональной образовательной программы по специальности и в сфере профессиональной деятельности техника
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
  • freely navigate the most common types of heating equipment
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
  • to search for the necessary normative literature and use it in solving professional tasks and calculations
Teaching methods

Study of the theory in conjunction with the equipment used in thermal power plants.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period Type of task Total
1  rating Classification of heat exchangers. Heat carriers 0-100
Thermal calculation of a convective heat exchanger
Calculations of heat exchangers
Oral questioning
Midterm control 1
2  rating Water heaters accumulators 0-100
Steam accumulators
Equipment and automatic control of heating points
Oral questioning
Midterm control 2
Total control Exam 0-100
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task 90-100 70-89 50-69 0-49
Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Know: · physical foundations of reliability analysis of electric power systems; · methods for calculating reliability indicators of electric power systems; · methods for synthesizing electrical power systems and networks at a given level of reliability. Be able to: · calculate indicators of the level of reliability of electric power systems; · synthesize diagrams of electrical power systems according to a given level of reliability; Own: · skills in drawing up design equivalent circuits for calculating reliability indicators of electric power systems and networks. A complete, detailed answer to the question posed is given, the totality of conscious knowledge about the object is shown, the main provisions of the topic are conclusively revealed; the answer shows a clear structure, a logical sequence that reflects the essence of the concepts, theories, and phenomena being revealed. Knowledge about an object is demonstrated against the background of understanding it in the system of a given science and interdisciplinary connections. The answer is stated in literary language in scientific terms. There may be shortcomings in the definition of concepts, which are corrected by the student independently during the answering process. A complete, but insufficiently consistent answer to the question posed is given, but at the same time the ability to identify essential and non-essential features and cause-and-effect relationships is demonstrated. The answer is logical and stated C+ 70-74 in scientific terms. There may be 1-2 mistakes made in defining basic concepts, which the student finds difficult to correct on his own An incomplete answer was given, representing scattered knowledge on the topic of the question with significant errors in definitions. There is fragmentation and illogical presentation. The student does not realize the connection of this concept, theory, phenomenon with other objects of the discipline. There are no conclusions, specificity and evidence of the presentation. Speech is illiterate. Additional and clarifying questions from the teacher do not lead to correction of the student’s answer not only to the question posed, but also to other questions in the disciplines A complete, detailed answer to the question posed is given, the totality of conscious knowledge about the object is shown, the main provisions of the topic are conclusively revealed; the answer shows a clear structure, a logical sequence that reflects the essence of the concepts, theories, and phenomena being revealed. Knowledge about an object is demonstrated against the background of understanding it in the system of a given science and interdisciplinary connections. The answer is stated in literary language in scientific terms. There may be shortcomings in the definition of concepts, which are corrected by the student independently during the answering process.
Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

  • 40% of the examination result;
  • 60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6 MT1+MT2 +0,4E
2

 

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade Numerical value Points (%) Traditional grade
A 4.0 95-100 Excellent
A- 3.67 90-94
B+ 3.33 85-89 Good
B 3.0 80-84
B- 2.67 75-79
C+ 2.33 70-74
C 2.0 65-69 Satisfactory
C- 1.67 60-64
D+ 1.33 55-59
D 1.0 50-54
FX 0.5 25-49 Unsatisfactory
F 0 0-24
Topics of lectures
  • Recuperative heat exchangers of continuous operation
  • Mixing type heat exchangers
  • Recuperative heat exchangers of periodic action
  • Distillation and distillation plants
  • Drying installations
  • Heat transformers
  • Heating systems
  • Heat treatment plants
  • Central heating systems
  • Equipment for hot water installations
Key reading
  • Голубков Б.Н. «Теплотехническое оборудование и теплоснабжение промышленных предприятий, М: Энергия, 2009г-544с.
  • Бакластов А.М. «проектирование, монтаж и эксплуатация теплоиспользующих установок, М: Энергия, 2007-289с.
  • Плановский А.Н. «Процессы и аппараты химической технологии», С.Петербург: Химия, 2009г-303с.
Further reading
  • Соловьев Ю.П. «Вспомогательное оборудование ТЭЦ, центральных котельных и его автоматизация», М: Энергия, 2008г,318 с.