Local systems automation and control
Description: The discipline deals with the classification of automation and control systems, the tasks of their creation, aggregate complexes of technical means, microprocessor controllers, methods for setting up industrial regulators, automation of typical technological processes. Knowledge of the principles of constructing modern local automation and control systems, industrial regulators, on the basis of which such systems are built, and skills in calculating the settings of regulators are being shaped.
Amount of credits: 5
Пререквизиты:
- Linear Systems of Automatic Control
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | 15 |
| Practical works | |
| Laboratory works | 30 |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | oral exam |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Base disciplines
Goal
- mastering the theoretical and practical foundations for the construction, functioning of local control systems, control, regulation based on microcontrollers and programmable logic controllers.
Objective
- development of knowledge on the construction and operation of local control systems, control, regulation based on microcontrollers and programmable logic controllers;
- formation of skills for building automation and control systems based on knowledge of the elements of the theory of automatic control and modern complexes of technical means of automation;
- acquisition of skills in engineering research of objects and synthesis on this basis of control, regulation and management algorithms that ensure the high-quality functioning of technical systems.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- describe prospects and development trends, principles of construction, element base of local management, control, regulation systems;
- describe the command system, architecture, structure and programming languages of microcontrollers and programmable logic controllers;
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- apply methods of mathematical analysis and modeling, fundamentals of theoretical and experimental research in the field of building local automation systems
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- pose and solve innovative engineering analysis problems related to the development of technical control systems using analytical methods and complex models.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- report trends in the field of automation of production systems, promising directions and opportunities for practical application, both to specialists and non-specialists;
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- select appropriate control methods and algorithms, synthesize, design, construct and configure control devices based on the latest achievements of science and technology
Teaching methods
technologies of educational and research activities
information and communication technologies
modular learning technology
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | laboratory work "Analysis of a modeling object as a model system." | 0-100 |
| laboratory work "Construction of a block diagram of a local automation system." | ||
| laboratory work "Construction of a functional diagram of a local automation system." | ||
| laboratory work "Modeling of monitoring and control systems." | ||
| Boundary control 2 | ||
| 2 rating | laboratory work "Research of on-off regulators and systems." | 0-100 |
| laboratory work "Research of three-position regulators and systems." | ||
| laboratory work "Studying the principles of programming controllers for controlling technological processes based on the algorithmic language Structured Control Language." | ||
| laboratory work "Studying the principles of programming controllers for controlling technological processes based on the graphical language Function Block Diagram." | ||
| Boundary control 2 | ||
| Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Interview on control questions | Demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions | Demonstrates strong theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes minor mistakes, which he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher | Demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, poorly developed skills in analyzing phenomena and processes, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, shows insufficient fluency in monologue speech, terminology, logic and consistency of presentation, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by correction by the teacher. | Demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions |
| Work in laboratory classes | Completed the work in full in compliance with the required sequence of actions; in the answer, correctly and accurately completes all records, tables, pictures, drawings, graphs, calculations; performs error analysis correctly. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the material being studied and previously studied, as well as with the material acquired in the study of other disciplines. | Completed the work as required for a “5” rating, but there were 2-3 shortcomings. The student’s answer to the questions satisfies the basic requirements for answering 5, but is given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using connections with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other disciplines; If one mistake or no more than two shortcomings are made, the student can correct them independently or with a little help from the teacher. | Completed the work not completely, but not less than 50% of the volume, which allows you to obtain the correct results and conclusions; Errors were made during the work. When answering questions, the student correctly understands the essence of the question, but in the answer there are some problems in mastering the course questions that do not interfere with further mastery of the program material; no more than one gross error and two omissions were made. | Completed the work in full in compliance with the required sequence of actions; in the answer, correctly and accurately completes all records, tables, pictures, drawings, graphs, calculations; performs error analysis correctly. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the material being studied and previously studied, as well as with the material acquired in the study of other disciplines. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- The place of local systems in the hierarchy of control systems
- Tasks and control objects in automated production systems
- General principles of management
- Analysis of control objects
- Elements of systems theory and modeling
- Structural and functional diagrams of a managed object
- Information in monitoring and control systems
- Fundamentals of computer control
- Transfer of information in automated control systems of a production system
- Software for automated control systems of production systems
- Engineering methods of analysis and synthesis of automation and control systems
- Prospects for the development of automated control systems
Key reading
- Shemelin V. K., Hazanova O.V. Upravlenie sistemami i processami: Uchebnik – Staryj Oskol : TNT, 2021. – 320 s.
- Kovalev P.I. Vvedenie v teoriyu modelirovaniya sistem upravleniya: uchebnoe posobie. – Tyumen': TyumGNGU, 2014. - 68 s.
- Kolosov O.S. Tekhnicheskie sredstva avtomatizacii i upravleniya: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata . - Moskva: Yurajt, 2018. - 291 s.
- Shishov O.V. Programmiruemye kontrollery v sistemah promyshlennoj avtomatizacii: uchebnik. - Moskva: INFRA-M, 2018. - 365 s.
Further reading
- Fedotov A.V. Avtomatizaciya upravleniya v proizvodstvennyh sistemah. - Omsk, 2001. - 354 s.
- Kartashov B.A. Komp'yuternye tekhnologii i mikroprocessornye sredstva v avtomaticheskom upravlenii: uchebnoe posobie – Rostov-na-Donu : Feniks, 2013. – 541 s.
- Tekhnicheskie sredstva avtomatizacii i upravleniya: uchebnoe posobie / O. V. Shishov. - Moskva: INFRA-M, 2016. - 396 s.
- Sen'kov, A. G. Avtomatika. Laboratornyj praktikum: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie / A. G. Sen'kov, N. M. Matvejchuk, E. E. Myakinnik. – Minsk : BGATU, 2017. – 204 s.
