Architectural Design - 2
Description: DStudying the techniques of conceptual architectural design. Based on the materials, their systematization and analysis, carried out within the framework of the discipline "Architectural design-1", undergraduates develop options for conceptual architectural and planning models of objects on the topic of master's research.
Amount of credits: 6
Пререквизиты:
- Architectural Design - 1
- Undergraduate Project
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | |
| Practical works | 60 |
| Laboratory works | |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 90 |
| Course Project | |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | Creative examination in the form of a graphic clause |
Component: University component
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- Formation of competencies in the field of conceptual architectural design based on research on the topic of the master's thesis
Objective
- Using materials from Architectural Design-2, carry out a comprehensive pre-project analysis of the site on the topic of the Master's study
- Consider options for social, functional, urban planning, spatial planning, typological models of the object on the topic of master's research
- Based on the studied models and concepts, to develop an architectural/urban planning project of the object in accordance with the topic of the master's study
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- Master the problems of innovative (conceptual) design, interdisciplinary environmental design;
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- Possess systems and methods of analysis and evaluation of objects of architecture/urban planning/subject-spatial environment;
- Conduct a comprehensive pre-project analysis and substantiate conceptually new project ideas
- On the basis of a pre-project study, master the methodology of variant design
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- Critically evaluate the results of scientific research and design developments, conduct their expertise. compose relevant reviews and reviews
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- To find reasoned justifications for architectural decisions that meet modern socio-cultural requirements. artistic and aesthetic, economic, environmental, engineering and technical, functional requirements.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- The ability to independently collect information, analyze and search for advanced information on the problem of interest, processing the data obtained to make a conceptual design decision
Teaching methods
Рractical lesson using the method of analyzing specific situations;
Сritical thinking development technology - Brainstorming, situational problem solving, demonstration method
Тthe technology of project training is the construction of scenarios for the development of various situations with given conditions
Тhe technology of problem-based learning is an independent study of undergraduates in the learning process.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Problem statement | 0-100 |
| Factors of influence | ||
| Socio-functional model | ||
| image clauses | ||
| 2 rating | Composition and planning model | 0-100 |
| Development of project elements | ||
| Total control | Exam, Course Project | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Practical works | Completion of the work in time, in the volume from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - All tasks are done competently, taking into account the complex analysis; - When performing the work, the student shows extensive knowledge of theoretical material, regulatory requirements, the ability to formulate the problem, analyse, classify and generalise, build interdisciplinary links, build conceptual models of different levels and evaluate them; - The aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - In the work, the graduate student demonstrates the relationship between the studied and early | Completion of work on time, in the volume of 70-89% in accordance with the task. All tasks are performed competently, taking into account the complex analysis. Allowed 2-3 flaws, which the student can correct independently or with a little help from the teacher. When performing the work, the student shows good knowledge of theoretical material, oriented in the regulatory requirements, the ability to classify, generalise and build interdisciplinary links; build a conceptual model and evaluate it; . In the work, the graduate student demonstrates the connection between the material studied and previously studied. Creatively uses previously learnt skills | The work is not fully completed, but not less than 50% of the practical work, which allows to obtain certain results and conclusions on the basis of complex analysis; mistakes were made in the course of the work. The student correctly understands the essence of the task, but there are some problems in the ability to classify and generalise, to build interdisciplinary links. When performing work, the student shows satisfactory knowledge of theoretical material and regulatory requirements, Previously acquired skills are creatively used weakly. | Completion of the work in time, in the volume from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - All tasks are done competently, taking into account the complex analysis; - When performing the work, the student shows extensive knowledge of theoretical material, regulatory requirements, the ability to formulate the problem, analyse, classify and generalise, build interdisciplinary links, build conceptual models of different levels and evaluate them; - The aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - In the work, the graduate student demonstrates the relationship between the studied and early |
| Coursework | The composition of the assignment is completed in the volume of at least 91% in accordance with the topic of Master's research; the elements of the project are developed in accordance with the formulated problem and the structure of the thesis, competently, taking into account the theoretical and regulatory framework on the basis of factor analysis and design model (developed within the discipline "Architectural Design-1"). Architectural (urban planning) concept of the object on the topic of Master's research reflects an integrated approach to the study. The master performs a structured and detailed analysis of the urban planning situation, presents possible variants of concepts, clearly and reasonably justifies the final choice of one of the alternative solutions; the author's idea of the design model is distinguished by originality and fully revealed by professional means and techniques; the design of the work is performed at a high level. | The composition of the assignment is 80-90% in accordance with the topic of Master's research; the elements of the project are developed in accordance with the formulated problem and the structure of the thesis competently, taking into account the theoretical and regulatory framework on the basis of factor analysis and design model (developed within the discipline "Architectural Design-1"). Architectural (town-planning) concept of the object on the topic of Master's research reflects a comprehensive approach to the study; the Master carries out a structured analysis of the object of research; argumentatively justifies the developed design concept; the author's idea of the concept is revealed by professional means and techniques; the design of the work is performed at a good level. | The composition of the task is executed on 60-75% on the topic of master's research; the elements of the project do not fully meet the problem structure of the thesis, developed on a weak theoretical basis, incomplete factor analysis; the developed concept of architectural (urban planning) object on the topic of master's research does not fully reflect the integrated approach to the study; the author's idea of the concept is revealed by primitive means and techniques; the design of the work is performed at a sufficient (satisfactory) level. | The composition of the assignment is completed in the volume of at least 91% in accordance with the topic of Master's research; the elements of the project are developed in accordance with the formulated problem and the structure of the thesis, competently, taking into account the theoretical and regulatory framework on the basis of factor analysis and design model (developed within the discipline "Architectural Design-1"). Architectural (urban planning) concept of the object on the topic of Master's research reflects an integrated approach to the study. The master performs a structured and detailed analysis of the urban planning situation, presents possible variants of concepts, clearly and reasonably justifies the final choice of one of the alternative solutions; the author's idea of the design model is distinguished by originality and fully revealed by professional means and techniques; the design of the work is performed at a high level. |
| The examination is conducted in the form of a graphic clause | The work is completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is disclosed in depth and in full. Elements of the clause are competently done, based on a comprehensive study, arranged compositionally logically and consistently. The master's student demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, is fluent in terminology, makes reasoned conclusions and generalisations, establishes cause-and-effect relationships. Expressive architectural solution reflects the architectural concept of the subject of study. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques is fully maintained. The aesthetics of work design is at a high level. The degree of elaboration of tasks from 90 to 100%. | The work has been completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is disclosed in full. The elements of the clause are competently done, based on a comprehensive study, arranged compositionally logically and consistently. Master demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, allows inaccuracies in terminology, logic of presentation; the task is completed, but there is no full argumentation of the chosen solution, theoretical justification of the concept is not sufficient, not all the reasons are established, not a complete analysis is made; there is no clear argumentation for the proposed solution. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques is fully maintained. The aesthetics of work design is at a high or good level. The degree of elaboration of tasks from 70 to 89%. | Тапсырманың тақырыбы толық көлемде ашылмаған. Клаузура элементтері талдаудың нашар қалыптасқан дағдыларын және магистранттың терең емес теориялық білімін көрсетеді. Жобалау моделіне әсер ететін факторларды сипаттайды, бірақ оларды еркін қолдануда қиындықтар туғызады, терминологияда қателер жібереді. Тұжырымдар әлсіз, өз көзқарасы негізделмеген, тұжырымдамалық шешімді түпкілікті таңдаудың нақты дәлелі жоқ. Тапсырма орындалды, бірақ көптеген кемшіліктері бар. Тапсырмаларды пысықтау дәрежесі 50-ден 69% -ға дейін. | The work is completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is disclosed in depth and in full. Elements of the clause are competently done, based on a comprehensive study, arranged compositionally logically and consistently. The master's student demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, is fluent in terminology, makes reasoned conclusions and generalisations, establishes cause-and-effect relationships. Expressive architectural solution reflects the architectural concept of the subject of study. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques is fully maintained. The aesthetics of work design is at a high level. The degree of elaboration of tasks from 90 to 100%. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of practical classes
- Introductory conversation
- Presentation and protection of individual project research topics
- The relevance of research
- Criteria for the selection of options and justification of the design area
- Historical, cultural and urban planning analysis of the selected design region,
- Formation of an optimized urban planning solution of the projected object
- Development of a conceptual model of the design object in accordance with the subject of the master's study: functional, energy efficient
- Development of project elements depending on the direction of the subject of the master's study
- Formation of an optimized space-planning solution of the projected object
- Project protection
Key reading
- 1. Kozlov M.V Teoriya gradostroitel'stva: Uchebnoe posobie. (2-e izd. dop.). Almaty: TOO "Medet Group", 2021.-182 s.
- 1.KAZGOR. Proekty. – Almaty: Izdatel'stvo «Basbaqan, 2019 – 368 s.
Further reading
- Kuzin F.A. Magisterskaya dissertatsiya. Prakticheskoe posobie dlya studentov - magistrantov.- M.: Os', 1998.-276 s.
- Бархин Б.Г. Методика архитектурного проектирования: Учеб.-метод. пособие.-3-е изд., переработ. и доп. - М.:Стройиздат, 1993. - 438 с.: ил.
