HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Monitoring of highways

Makhiev Bekbolat Espulovich

Description: Road condition monitoring is a system of observation and control, assessment and forecasting of possible anthropogenic changes in their condition as a result of operation and environmental impact. The discipline examines the improvement of the transport and operational condition of roads on the basis of visual and instrumental inspection, analysis of the results and development of measures and timing of road repairs on the basis there of.

Amount of credits: 5

Пререквизиты:

Motor roads of General network

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures	15
Practical works	30
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	еxam

Component: Component by selection

Cycle: Base disciplines

Goal

The formation of professional knowledge and necessary practical skills used by the graduate student in the implementation of the master's thesis, the study of theoretical provisions and the development of practical skills in the survey and design of highways.

Objective

A complete study of the transport and operational performance of individual elements and structures as a whole in order to further monitor the highway.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

knowledge of the basic elements of the route plan, the longitudinal profile and transverse profiles of the highway, as well as the transport and operational characteristics of the condition of the transport facility

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

the ability to choose and apply optimal methods and methods for assessing the condition of a transport facility

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

engineering and technical representation of the need for knowledge on the study of technical and economic indicators .

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

Mastering communication skills and etiquette in the field of communication, orientation within the framework of this profession.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

Information analysis, expansion of professional activity in the field of road construction

Teaching methods

Search and research (independent research activity with in-process learning); - solving educational tasks.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Practical work No. 1	0-100
	Practical work No. 2
	Practical work No. 3
	The test is rated 1
2 rating	Practical work No. 4	0-100
	Practical work No. 5
	Practical work No. 6
	The test is rated 2
Total control	Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Interview on control issues	- demonstrates system theoretical knowledge	- demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes insignificant mistakes that he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher;	- demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by a teacher;	- demonstrates system theoretical knowledge
Working in practical classes	-completion of all planned practical work on time and in full. Registration of all practical work and protection to the teacher. Performing practical work in full compliance with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, drawings, drawings, graphs, calculations; correctly performs error analysis.	- freely navigates his completed practical work, explains the progress of the work performed, shows the sequence of calculations, but at the same time makes insignificant mistakes that he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher;	- demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by a teacher;	-completion of all planned practical work on time and in full. Registration of all practical work and protection to the teacher. Performing practical work in full compliance with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, drawings, drawings, graphs, calculations; correctly performs error analysis.
Lecture sessions	- when studying lecture material, he demonstrates well in the survey, systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions	- demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge in lecture classes and, during a control survey, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes insignificant mistakes that he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher;	- during the control survey, shallow demonstrates weak theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by a teacher;	- when studying lecture material, he demonstrates well in the survey, systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions
Examination block	- during the exam, he demonstrates systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, and gives an excellent answer to all three questions of the exam ticket.	- demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge at the exam, logically and consistently explains the essence of the proposed questions of the exam ticket, gives examples, shows fluency in topics;	- on the exam, he demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, but not less than 50% of the volume;	- during the exam, he demonstrates systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, and gives an excellent answer to all three questions of the exam ticket.
Course project	- the course project is performed in full, observing the necessary sequence of actions; correctly and neatly performs all notes, Tables, Figures, diagrams, graphs, calculations in the answer; correctly performs error analysis.	- the course project was completed according to the requirements for the assessment "5", but 2-3 shortcomings were made. The student's answer to the questions satisfies the basic requirements for answering 5, but is given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using links with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other disciplines;	- the course project was not completed completely, but at least 50% of the volume of practical work, which allows you to get the right results and conclusions; mistakes were made during the work.	- the course project is performed in full, observing the necessary sequence of actions; correctly and neatly performs all notes, Tables, Figures, diagrams, graphs, calculations in the answer; correctly performs error analysis.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of lectures

Transport and operational characteristics of roads
Seasonal changes in road conditions and their impact on accidents
Consideration of traffic safety requirements in road design standards
The influence of highway elements on traffic safety
The mutual combination of road elements and traffic safety
Methods for assessing dangerous road sections
Methods for assessing dangerous road sections
Assessment of dangerous road sections by plotting accident coefficients
Assessment of traffic capacity, load level, and ease of movement on the highway
Road surveys to assess traffic safety
Ways to eliminate dangerous places on the roads
The role of organizational measures in improving traffic safety

Key reading

1. Федотов Г.А., Поспелов П.И. Изыскание и проектирование автомобильных дорог. – М:, «Академия» 2018 г.- 465 с. 2. Горшков Н.Г. Изыскание и проектирование автомобильных дорог промышленного транспорта. –Белгород:, 2017 г. – 135 с. 3. СНиП РК 3.03-09-2006 Строительные нормы и правила. Автомобильные дороги, Астана 2007. 4. Методические рекомендации по проектированию жестких дорожных одежд . М.: Информавтодор, 2004. – 69 с. 5. СНиП РК 2.04-01-2001 «Строительная климатология» 6. СТ РК 1397 Требования к составу и оформлению проектной и рабочей документации. 7. Смирнова Т.Н. Общие требования к содержанию и оформлению учебно-методической литературы и других текстовых документов. У-Ка, ВКГТУ, 2002. 8. Б.Б. Каримов, Е.К. Салимбаев. Автомобильные дороги. Содружества Независимых Государств. М.: Интранедорнаука, 2006-264с

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan