Management of innovative projects and protecting intellectual property
Description: The project, knowledge, skills, tools and methods of working with the project, implementation stages and project life cycle, management of project components, quality control, project closure. Intellectual property in the innovation process, objects of intellectual property and copyright, authors' rights and their protection, inventions, protection of inventions, know-how, industrial designs.
Amount of credits: 5
Пререквизиты:
- Innovative Solutions in Mechanical Systems
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | 15 |
Practical works | 30 |
Laboratory works | |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 75 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 30 |
Form of final control | Exam |
Final assessment method | exam |
Component: University component
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- Capability to integrate knowledge and to cope with difficult questions and to formulate judgments on the basis of modern aspects of the mechanical engineering development, taking into account the social and ethical responsibility connected with use of their knowledge and judgmentto apply knowledge and understanding, and ability to solve problems in new and unfamiliar contexts within broader (multidisciplinary) contexts related to their field of studys
Objective
- to apply knowledge and understanding, and ability to solve problems in new and unfamiliar contexts within broader (multidisciplinary) contexts related to their field of study
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- knowledge of the PhD students about current state and further development of the innovation project management and intellectual property protection
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- to apply knowledge and understanding, and ability to solve problems in new and unfamiliar contexts within broader (multidisciplinary) contexts related to their field of study
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- to integrate knowledge and to cope with difficult questions and to formulate judgments, taking into account the social and ethical responsibility connected with use of their knowledge and judgments
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- to tell the conclusions and knowledge used for its formulation and justification concerning innovation project management and intellectual property protection
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- to have abilities in the field of innovation project management and intellectual property protection, allowing continuing training considerably independently
Teaching methods
online lectures and seminars
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | report | 0-100 |
2 rating | report | 0-100 |
Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Innovative management
- Project evaluation factors
- Organizational forms of innovation activity
- Problems of intellectual property in the innovation process
- Author's rights to IP objects
- Types of industrial designs
- Innovation-Documentation
- Project management
- Project Management Processes
- Project Cost Management
Key reading
- 1) Moder, Joseph J. and Cecil R. Phillips, Project Management With CPM and PERT, Van Nostrand-Reinhold Company, New York, 1970 (2nd. ed.) 2) Cleland, David I. and William R. King, Systems Analysis and Project Management, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1968. 3) Martino, R. L., Project Management and Control in three volumes: “Finding the Critical Path,” “Applied Operational Planning,” and “Allocating and Scheduling Resources,” American Management Association, New York, 1964. 4) O’Brien, James J., CPM in Construction Management, McGraw- Hill Book Company, New York, 1971 (2nd ed.). 5) Archibald, Russell D. and Richard L. Villoria, Network Based Management Systems (PERT/CPM), Wiley, New York, 1967. 6) Harvard Business Review, Managing Projects and Programs Series: Reprints from Harvard Business Review — No. 21300, c 1971. 7) Wiest, J. D. and F. K. Levy, A Management Guide to PERT/ CPM, Prentice Hall, Inc., New York, 1969. 8) Baumgartner, J. S., Project Management, Richard D. Irwin Co., New York, 1963. 9) Clough, Richard H., Construction Project Management, Wiley- Interscience, New York, 1972. 10) Drucker, Peter F., Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices, Harper & Row, 1974. 11) Bonny and Frein (eds.), Handbook of Construction Management and Organization, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1973.
Further reading
- 1) Woodgate, H. S., Planning by Network, Project Planning and Control Using Techniques, Brandon Systems Press, New York, 1967. 2) Peart, Allan T., Project Management Systems and Records, Cahner, 1971.