Higher Education Pedagogics

Kasentaeva Karlygash Urazbekovna

The instructor profile

Description: The relevance of studying the discipline is related to the need for advanced training of a professionally competent university teacher who is able to actively participate in innovative processes in the higher education system. The course is aimed at preparing masters for teaching in higher education. The course content reflects current trends in the humanization and democratization of the university's educational process, new educational technologies, and focuses on an individual creative style of activity.

Amount of credits: 3

Пререквизиты:

  • Sociology

Course Workload:

Types of classes hours
Lectures 15
Practical works 15
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) 15
SAW (Student autonomous work) 45
Form of final control Exam
Final assessment method oral examination

Component: University component

Cycle: Base disciplines

Goal
  • improving the professional training of future university teachers, familiarizing them with the methodological and theoretical foundations of higher school pedagogy, modern approaches to the analysis, planning and organization of the educational process in higher education
Objective
  • - 1. Awareness of the actual problems of pedagogical science in the context of higher education, the essence of the activity of a university teacher at the present stage. 2. Mastering the skills of designing and organizing the educational process at the university. 3. Development of communication skills and proficiency in modern educational technologies.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
  • - Possess the skills of applying innovative pedagogical technologies in the classroom at a professional level,
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
  • the ability to apply various methods of conducting classes
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
  • білім беру саласындағы жаһандық өзгерістер туралы ойды жеткізе білу
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
  • the ability to form effective communication skills in the transfer of knowledge in teaching disciplines
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
  • cognitive skills that include the ability to think, analyze, synthesize, and solve problems. Self-study and independence skills. The ability to self-study and independence contributes to the development of initiative and independence.
Teaching methods

personal project technology; o-oriented, dialogic, problem-based learning, information technology, and others

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period Type of task Total
1  rating 1-7 Workshop topics 0-100
2  rating 8-15 Workshop topics 0-100
Total control Exam 0-100
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task 90-100 70-89 50-69 0-49
Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
The teacher conducts all types of ongoing monitoring work and outputs an appropriate assessment of students' current academic performance twice during the academic period. Based on the results of the current control, a rating of 1 and 2 is formed. The student's academic achievements are evaluated on a 100-point scale, the final grade of P1 and P2 is derived as the arithmetic average of the current academic performance. The assessment of the student's work during the academic period is carried out by the teacher in accordance with the schedule of assignments in the discipline. The control system can combine written and oral, group and individual forms. complete and correct answers on theoretical questions are given. The correct but incomplete answers are given. the answers to the theoretical questions are vague and superficial complete and correct answers on theoretical questions are given.
Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

  • 40% of the examination result;
  • 60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6 MT1+MT2 +0,4E
2

 

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade Numerical value Points (%) Traditional grade
A 4.0 95-100 Excellent
A- 3.67 90-94
B+ 3.33 85-89 Good
B 3.0 80-84
B- 2.67 75-79
C+ 2.33 70-74
C 2.0 65-69 Satisfactory
C- 1.67 60-64
D+ 1.33 55-59
D 1.0 50-54
FX 0.5 25-49 Unsatisfactory
F 0 0-24
Topics of lectures
  • Topic 1
  • Topic 2
  • Topic 3
  • Topic 4
  • Professional and pedagogical culture of a higher school teacher
  • Topic 6
  • Topic 7
  • Topic 8
  • Topic 9
  • Topic 10
  • Topic 11
  • Topic 12
  • Topic 13
  • Topic 14
  • Higher School Management
Key reading
  • . Main: 1. The Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Education" 2. The Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Higher Education" 3. The State program for the development of the education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2029. 4. The concept of development of the education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2029 5. Arkhangelsky S.I. The educational process in higher education, its logical foundations and methods, Moscow, 2018. 6. Zagvyazinsky V.I. Didactics of higher education. The text of the lectures. – Chelyabinsk., 2017 7. Kraevsky V.V. General fundamentals of pedagogy, Moscow, 2013. 8. Karamyan G.G. Theory and mastery of lecture teaching in higher education. – Yerevan , 2013 9. Dzhurinsky A.N. Comparative pedagogy. Moscow, 2020
Further reading
  • 1. Smirnov V.D. Pedagogy, Moscow, 2021. 2. Kabanova T. A., Novikov V.A. Testing in modern education, Moscow, 2020 3. Zavalko N.A., Iskakov B.A. Developing media competence. Educational and methodical manual. Ust-Kamenogorsk, 2010 4. Zavalko N.A., Iskakov B.A. Recommendations for teachers on the development of media competence. Educational and methodical manual. Ust-Kamenogorsk, 2010 5. Mynbaeva A.K. Fundamentals of higher school pedagogy. Textbook, Almaty, 2013.- 183 p. 6. Mynbaeva A.K. and others. Educational Policy, Almaty, 2014 – 225 p. 7.Mynbaeva A.K., Vishnevskaya A.V. Psychological and pedagogical diagnostics and development of creative potential and creativity of students and undergraduates.- Almaty, 2014. - 184 p.