Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Kazakh(Russian) Language

Erezhepova Saule Karataevna

Description: The volume and content of the teaching and language material is differentiated in accordance with the learning objectives and is aimed at practice-oriented training in educational programs, practical mastery of various types of speech activity within the framework of the future specialty. Mastering the lexical and terminological minimum for the chosen profession. Development of communicative means inherent in individual styles; development of reading and listening skills.

Amount of credits: 10

Пререквизиты:

Kazakh(Russian) Language
Казахский (русский) язык. Школьный курс

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	45
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Abstract
Form of final control	Abstract
Final assessment method	Written exam. It consists of 3 blocks: the 1st block is a mini-test (10 min); the 2nd block is to define terms (35 min) and the 3rd block is practical work with text (55 min). Exam duration is 1 hour 40 minutes. The examination material consists of 40% theoretical material and 60% practical material The student passed the module if the final score is above 50%.

Component: Mandatory component

Cycle: Secondary disciplines

Goal

Russian Russian is a practice-oriented provision of high–quality assimilation of the Russian language as a means of social, intercultural, professional communication through the formation of communicative competencies at all levels of language use for students of Russian as a foreign language - level C1.

Objective

To contribute to the improvement and deepening of the level of knowledge and skills of students of the basic norms of the Russian language for use in professional activities.
To form and improve terminological skills and abilities of students on the basis of specially selected professionally-oriented texts, to form skills of comparative analysis of terms in Russian and native languages of students.
To form the skills and abilities of using scientific literature in the specialty in order to obtain information that contributes to the formation of professional competence.
To teach how to extract the necessary information from the text of the specialty, describe it, generalize and interpret it in order to use it in the process of educational and professional communication.
To form the skills of compiling documentation necessary for professional activity, in compliance with the norms of the Russian literary language.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

Correctly choose and use linguistic and speech-learning tools based on a full understanding of vocabulary, grammatical system of knowledge and pragmatic content of intentions; convey the exact content of the text, be able to formulate conclusions, characterize the final part of the entire text and its individual structural parts; identify textual information, explain stylistic and genre features of social, socio-cultural, social-political, educational and professional texts.

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

Be able to request and communicate information in accordance with the communication situation, evaluate the actions of participants in speech communication, use information to influence a familiar or unfamiliar interlocutor; in accordance with the peculiarities of linguistic and cultural communication, show personal, social and professional.

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

Discuss ethical, culturological and socially significant problems at discussions, be able to express their point of view, justify it, critically evaluate the opinion of participants; realize personal needs (everyday, educational, social, cultural, professional), be able to participate in various communication situations in order to express ethically correct, from a meaningful point of view, complete, on the proper lexico-grammatical and pragmatic level of their position.

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

To perceive the basic semantic information (at the level of general, detailed and critical understanding), as well as communicative intentions, including the implicit intentions of the speakers, significant for the further nature of the ongoing monologue and dialogue. Speech aspects of business communication: establishing business contacts and conducting negotiations. Features of telephone communication: telephone etiquette, features of communication using mobile communication. Features of communication by e-mail.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

To present and adequately interpret the texts of educational and scientific communication. Create educational and scientific communication: written and oral scientific presentation. To prove ways of presenting information in an educational and scientific text. Defend speech strategies in educational and scientific discussion. Possess the skills of the basics of conducting scientific and professional-business rhetoric.

Teaching methods

Communication technology.

Competence-based learning.

Role-playing games and educational discussions of various formats.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Presentation. Visualization. Presentation protection.	0-100
	Front-end survey. Work in small groups.
	Protection of micro-projects.
	Cinquain. Fishbone. Presentation protection.
	Development of an associogram.
	Presentation. Visualization.
	Presentation Protection.
	Frontier control.
2 rating	Presentation Protection.	0-100
	Small group work.
	Research assignment defense.
	Mini project.
	Small group work.
	Drawing up a diagram. Glossary check.
	Frontier control.
Total control	Abstract, Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Small group work.	Demonstrate deep and complete knowledge and understanding of the entire volume of the studied material; fully understand the essence of the concepts, phenomena and patterns, theories, relationships under consideration; be able to build a complete and correct answer on the basis of the studied material; highlight the main provisions, independently support the answer with specific examples, facts; analyze, generalize conclusions independently proven; interdisciplinary and (on the basis.	From 70 to 89 points: knowledge of all the studied program material; a complete and correct answer based on the studied theories; minor errors and shortcomings in the reproduction of the studied material, definitions of concepts, inaccuracies in the use of scientific terms or in conclusions and generalizations; the material is presented in a certain logical sequence, but one non-rough error is allowed or not there are more than two shortcomings, and the student can correct them independently if required or with a little help from the teacher; he has mostly mastered the teaching material; confirms the answer with concrete examples.	From 50-69 points: there are significant deviations from the topic in the answer; the analysis of the problem provided by the question is fragmentary, incomplete; facts are not always separated from opinions, but the student understands the difference between them.	Demonstrate deep and complete knowledge and understanding of the entire volume of the studied material; fully understand the essence of the concepts, phenomena and patterns, theories, relationships under consideration; be able to build a complete and correct answer on the basis of the studied material; highlight the main provisions, independently support the answer with specific examples, facts; analyze, generalize conclusions independently proven; interdisciplinary and (on the basis.
Submission of tasks for the student's independent work.	Demonstration of deep and complete knowledge and understanding of the entire volume of the studied material; full understanding of the essence of the concepts, phenomena and patterns, theories, relationships under consideration; the ability to make a complete and correct answer based on the studied material; highlight the main points, independently support the answer with concrete examples, facts; independently make reasoned analysis, generalize conclusions; the ability to establish interdisciplinary (based on previously acquired knowledge) and intra-subject relationships.	Knowledge of all the studied program material; a complete and correct answer based on the studied theories; minor errors and flaws in the reproduction of the studied material, definitions of concepts, inaccuracies in the use of scientific terms or in conclusions and generalizations; the material is presented in a certain logical sequence, but one blunt error or no more than two flaws is allowed, and the student he can correct them on his own if required or with a little help from a teacher; he has mostly mastered the educational material; confirms the answer with specific examples.	There are significant deviations from the topic in the answer; the analysis of the problem provided by the question is fragmentary, incomplete; facts are not always separated from opinions, but the student understands the difference between them.	Demonstration of deep and complete knowledge and understanding of the entire volume of the studied material; full understanding of the essence of the concepts, phenomena and patterns, theories, relationships under consideration; the ability to make a complete and correct answer based on the studied material; highlight the main points, independently support the answer with concrete examples, facts; independently make reasoned analysis, generalize conclusions; the ability to establish interdisciplinary (based on previously acquired knowledge) and intra-subject relationships.
Preparation and protection of presentations.	The logical content is presented; the relevance of the topic under consideration is reflected, the main categories are correctly identified; in conclusion, detailed, independent conclusions are formulated.	The logical content is presented; the relevance of the topic is revealed; there are minor errors and shortcomings in the studied material; in conclusion, general conclusions are formulated.	The logical content is presented; the relevance of the topic is not fully disclosed; the theoretical analysis is given descriptively, the student did not reflect his own position in relation to the materials under consideration, a number of judgments are shallow; conclusions are not formulated.	The logical content is presented; the relevance of the topic under consideration is reflected, the main categories are correctly identified; in conclusion, detailed, independent conclusions are formulated.
Passing the lexical minimum.	Correct definition of the meaning of lexical words, the presence of minor errors is not allowed.	No more than one significant mistake and several minor ones were made.	There have been several significant and/or one gross error in determining the meaning of a word.	Correct definition of the meaning of lexical words, the presence of minor errors is not allowed.
Passing the grammatical minimum.	Fully expounds the studied material, gives correct definitions of linguistic concepts; discovers an understanding of the material, can justify his judgments, apply knowledge in practice, give necessary examples; presents the material consistently and correctly from the point of view of the norms of the literary language.	The student gives a satisfactory answer, but makes 1-2 mistakes, which he corrects himself and 1-2 flaws in the sequence and linguistic design of the material being presented.	The student discovers knowledge and understanding of the main provisions of this topic, but presents the material incompletely and admits inaccuracies in the definition of concepts or the formulation of rules; does not know how to substantiate his judgments in sufficient depth and evidence and give his examples; presents the material inconsistently and makes mistakes in the linguistic design of what is being presented.	Fully expounds the studied material, gives correct definitions of linguistic concepts; discovers an understanding of the material, can justify his judgments, apply knowledge in practice, give necessary examples; presents the material consistently and correctly from the point of view of the norms of the literary language.
Frontier control.	It is put for work done without errors and defects, at least 100% of the tasks must be completed.	It is put to work if there is no more than one blunt error and one flaw in it, no more than three flaws. Between 70 and 89% of the tasks must be completed.	It is put if the student has correctly completed at least 50% of the entire work or has made no more than one gross error and two defects, no more than one gross and one blunt error, no more than three blunt errors, one blunt error and three defects, if there are four or five defects.	It is put for work done without errors and defects, at least 100% of the tasks must be completed.
A written exam.	The content of the written work fully meets the requirements; there are no factual errors; the content is presented consistently; the work is distinguished by the richness of the dictionary, the accuracy of word usage. In general, 1 defect in the content and 1-2 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: -1 spelling, or -1 punctuation, or -1 grammatical error.	The content of the work mostly corresponds to the topic (there are minor deviations from the topic); the content is mostly reliable, but there are isolated factual inaccuracies; there are minor violations of consistency in the presentation of thoughts. In general, no more than 2 defects in content and no more than 3-4 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: 2 spelling and 2 punctuation errors, or -1 spelling and 3 punctuation errors, or -4 punctuation errors in the absence of spelling errors, as well as 2 grammatical errors.	There are significant deviations from the question in the work; the work is reliable in the main, but there are some factual inaccuracies; incorrect usage occurs. In general, no more than 4 defects in content and 5 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: 4 spelling and 4 punctuation errors, or 3 spelling errors and 5 punctuation errors, or 7 punctuation errors in the absence of spelling errors.	The content of the written work fully meets the requirements; there are no factual errors; the content is presented consistently; the work is distinguished by the richness of the dictionary, the accuracy of word usage. In general, 1 defect in the content and 1-2 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: -1 spelling, or -1 punctuation, or -1 grammatical error.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

The language and its main functions
Text as the main unit of communication
Functional and semantic types of speech: description, narration, reasoning
Functional styles of the language
Artistic style
Conversational style
Journalistic style
Official-business style
Service documentation for internal use
Scientific style
Text as the basic unit of verbal communication
Scientific narrative as a source of information
Types of scientific information
Structural and semantic analysis of the scientific text
Monologue and dialogic speech

Key reading

Nikitina S.A. Russkij yazyk 11 kl. V 2-h chastyah. CHast' 2. 2020.
Surova D. S. Nauchnyj stil' rechi: ucheb. posobie / D. S. Surova; Ministerstvo obra-zovaniya i nauki Respubliki Kazahstan, Vostochno-Kazahstanskij gosudarstvennyj tekhnicheskij universitet im. D. Serikbaeva (Ust'-Kamenogorsk). - Ust'-Kamenogorsk: VKGTU, 2019. - 130 s.
Surova D.S. Prakticheskij kurs russkogo yazyka: ucheb.-metod. posobie / D. S. Surova ; MOiN RK, VKGTU im. D. Serikbaeva. - Ust'-Kamenogorsk: RIO, 2016. - 119 s.
Abylkairova, R.T. Russian: a textbook / R.T. Abylkaeva.- Almaty: Almanac, 2016.- 267 p.
Nikitina S.A. Russkij yazyk 11 kl. V 2-h chastyah. CHast' 1. 2020.
Sabitova Z. K. Russkij yazyk 10 kl.: Uchebnik dlya 10 klassov obshchestvenno-gumanitarnogo napravleniya. 2019.
Kornev, V. A. The Russian language in the speech aspect: a textbook for foreign students / V. A. Kornev, L. S. Katelina, O. M. Dedova. — Moscow: AI Pi Ar Media, 2021. — 412 p. — ISBN 978-5-4497-1324-7. — Text: electronic // Digital educational resource IPR SMART: [website]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/110123.html (date of application: 04/22/2024). — Access mode: for authorized users. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.23682/110123
Yadrikhinskaya, E. A. Collection of exercises in Russian grammar: a textbook / E. A. Yadrikhinskaya. — Voronezh: Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2023. — 96 p. — ISBN 978-5-00032-618-3. — Text: electronic // Digital educational resource IPR SMART: [website]. — URL:https://www.iprbookshop.ru/132745.html (date of application: 04/22/2024). — Access mode: for authorized users

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan