HUAWEI. Data Communication Networks
Description: The course gives an idea of the configurations of network services, the basics of network security. Also, the knowledge gained during the course makes it possible to design and build a network of any complexity using Huawei equipment. Communications in this course is understood as communication carried out through a data transmission network. This course describes concepts related to communications and the data transmission network, the process of information transmission, network devices and their functions, types of networks and typical networks.
Amount of credits: 8
Пререквизиты:
- Introduction to engineering
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | 30 |
Practical works | |
Laboratory works | 45 |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 45 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 120 |
Form of final control | Exam |
Final assessment method | Exam |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- To provide students with systematized information related to communications data transmission network, and their functions, types of networks and typical networks.
Objective
- know the concepts related to communications and data networks
- be able to describe the process of information transfer
- know the different types of networks and topologies
- know the concepts related to network design and the work of network engineers
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- Understand Huawei's data network solutions.
- Understand how switching stack technologies work
- Understand the entire process of forwarding data packets by network devices
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- Use the network protocol model to explain the layers of interaction in data networks
- Manage and configure Huawei devices
- Set up basic configurations for network reliability
- Configure basic security features for network devices
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- Correctly formulate questions and build professional dialogues on topics related to network technologies
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- Develop communication skills for organizing the process of training employees of enterprises and organizations in network user skills
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- Ability to organize inter-network interactions.
- Ability to configure modern network equipment.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | Huawei VRP and Configuration Basics | 0-100 |
Creating an interconnected IP network. | ||
OSPF Routing | ||
Creating a switched Ethernet network. | ||
Spanning Tree Protocol STP | ||
Ethernet Link Aggregation | ||
Communication between VLANs | ||
Setting up ACL. | ||
2 rating | 1 border control | 0-100 |
Setting up NAT. | ||
Setting up FTP. | ||
Creating a WLAN and creating an IPv6 network | ||
Configuring DHCP | ||
Fundamentals of Network Programming and Automation | ||
2nd border control | ||
Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
Interview on control questions | Demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, is proficient in terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions | Demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge, has a command of terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes minor mistakes that are corrected independently or with minor correction by the teacher | Demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, displays poorly developed skills in analyzing phenomena and processes, insufficient ability to make reasoned conclusions and give examples, demonstrates insufficiently fluent command of monologue speech, terminology, logic and consistency of presentation, makes mistakes that can only be corrected with correction from the teacher. | Demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, is proficient in terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions |
Work in practical classes | Completed the work in full, observing the required sequence of actions; the report is prepared in accordance with the requirements; correctly performs the error analysis. When answering questions, correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the main concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the material being studied and previously studied material, as well as with material learned while studying other disciplines. | Completed the work according to the requirement for a grade of "5", but 2-3 shortcomings were made. The student's answer to the questions satisfies the basic requirements for an answer of 5, but was given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using connections with previously studied material and material learned in studying other disciplines; one mistake or no more than two shortcomings were made, the student can correct them independently or with a little help from the teacher. | The work was not completed in full, but not less than 50% of the volume, which allows obtaining correct results and conclusions; errors were made during the work. When answering questions, the student correctly understands the essence of the question, but the answer contains individual problems in assimilation of the course questions that do not interfere with further assimilation of the program material; no more than one gross error and two shortcomings were made. | Completed the work in full, observing the required sequence of actions; the report is prepared in accordance with the requirements; correctly performs the error analysis. When answering questions, correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the main concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the material being studied and previously studied material, as well as with material learned while studying other disciplines. |
Boundary control | Milestone test: 18-20 points – knowledge demonstrated at a high level | Milestone test: 14-17 points – demonstrated knowledge at a basic level | Milestone test: 13-10 points – knowledge demonstrated at a satisfactory level | Milestone test: 18-20 points – knowledge demonstrated at a high level |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Data transmission networks
- Reference network model
- HUAWEI VRP Basics
- Network Layer Protocols
- IP Routing Basics
- OSPF Basics
- Ethernet Switching Basics
- VLAN principles and configuration
- Fundamentals of Network Security and Network Access
- Configuring Basic Network Services
Key reading
- 1. HCIA-Datacom Certification Lab Guide, v1.0, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., 2020 2. https://e.huawei.com/en/talent/outPage/#/sxz-course/home?courseId=tpDnx8BSoUVoUNyOKHI5UTQi-oc