Architectural Design VIII
Description: The discipline is aimed at mastering the principles of designing a residential area, studying the features of architectural planning and functional organization of residential areas. As part of the design, practical skills are acquired in the functional and architectural planning organization of residential structures with the organization of a service system, transport and pedestrian connections and landscaping.
Amount of credits: 7
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | |
| Practical works | 75 |
| Laboratory works | |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 105 |
| Course Project | |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | A creative exam in the form of a graphic clausura on the subject of urban planning design of residential formations. |
Component: University component
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- To master the theoretical and practical foundations of designing a residential planning formation of a city in modern socio-economic conditions.
Objective
- Solution of the planning composition of a residential neighborhood (quarter) and a public center of a residential area, taking into account landscape and urban planning factors
- Functional and planning organization of the territory of a microdistrict (block) and a public center of a residential area;
- Solution of transport and pedestrian connections on the territory of a residential area, a microdistrict and a public center of a residential area;
- Organization of a system of cultural and consumer services and landscaping of a residential area and a microdistrict (quarter);
- The spatial solution of the development of a residential neighborhood (quarter) and a public center.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- - demonstrate knowledge and understanding of regulatory requirements and theoretical foundations for the design of residential planning formations;
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- - to use domestic and foreign experience in the design of populated areas in modern practice;
- - draw up drawings in accordance with the design stage;
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- - to carry out the selection of materials for conducting pre-project studies and drawing up a social and functional program;
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- - сompetently present the studied material, check it, edit and submit for publication;
- - express author's ideas, as well as problems and solutions in professional circles in this subject area.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- - conduct pre-project surveys of the territory and use the data for design;
- - own the methodology for designing residential planning formations in the structure of the city;
- - to independently design urban residential formations (architectural and planning and functional structure, the system of KBO and transport and pedestrian links), taking into account a complex of factors;
- - find, accumulate and evaluate the information necessary for the design.
Teaching methods
When conducting training sessions, it is planned to use the following educational technologies: - traditional practical classes by type: assignment - execution; - innovative technologies.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Practical work: Territory analysis | 0-100 |
| Practical work: Analog analysis | ||
| Practical work: Functional planning organization of a residential area | ||
| Practical work: Sketch of the layout of the microdistrict (quarter) | ||
| Practical work:The general plan of the microdistrict | ||
| Practical work: Neighborhood and residential area diagrams | ||
| Practical work: Sweep, perspective, layout of residential education | ||
| 2 rating | Practical work: Sketch-idea of a community center | 0-100 |
| Practical work:The general plan of the public center | ||
| Practical work: Analog analysis | ||
| Practical work: Drawings for the service object | ||
| Practical work: Schemes for the community center | ||
| Practical work: Scans, layout | ||
| Total control | Exam, Course Project | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| The exam is conducted in the form of a creative graphic clausura on the subject of urban planning design of residential formations. | 1. The composition and theme fully correspond to the task. 2. The degree of elaboration of the elements is at least 90%. 3. Competent execution of all elements in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. 4. Creativity of the design solution. 5. Aesthetics of the design of the work at a high and good level. | 1. The composition and theme fully correspond to the task. 2. The degree of elaboration of the elements ranges from 70 to 89%. 3. Competent execution of all elements in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. Minor errors may be made that do not affect the fundamental decision and functionality of the object. 4. Standard design solutions have been applied. 5. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a good level. | 1. The topic fully corresponds to the task. The developed elements may lack perspective or sweep. 2. The degree of elaboration of the elements ranges from 50 to 69%. 3. The main elements (master plan and schemes) are executed in accordance with regulatory requirements. Significant errors may be made, when correcting which the fundamentally planning and functional solution of the object is preserved. 4. Standard design solutions have been applied. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a satisfactory level. | 1. The composition and theme fully correspond to the task. 2. The degree of elaboration of the elements is at least 90%. 3. Competent execution of all elements in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. 4. Creativity of the design solution. 5. Aesthetics of the design of the work at a high and good level. |
| Practical work | - completion of work on time and in the amount from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are completed correctly; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are creatively used. | - completion of work on time and in the amount from 70 to 89% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are performed correctly, but may contain minor errors that can be easily corrected; - the aesthetics of the design of the work is at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied. | - completion of work on time and in the amount from 50 to 69% in accordance with the task; - some tasks are not completed correctly (but not more than 50%), they may contain errors that can be corrected; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and standard solutions are applied. | - completion of work on time and in the amount from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are completed correctly; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are creatively used. |
| Course project | 1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the task. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their coordination with the teacher ranges from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project are executed competently, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. The issues of urban planning design have been comprehensively, rationally and creatively solved 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the master plan has been developed in harmonious relationship with the natural landscape. The environment of residential education and community center reflects the typological features of the architecture of urban settlements. 4. The graphic presentation of the project is made in the same style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level. | 1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the task. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their coordination with the teacher ranges from 70 to 89%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. Perhaps some issues of urban planning have not been solved rationally enough. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the master plan may be characterized by a more formalized approach. The environment of residential education and the community center does not fully reflect the architectural and typological features. 4. It is allowed to present the project graphically using different stylistic techniques that do not complicate the perception of the project, at a good architectural and artistic level. | 1. The topic of the course project fully corresponds to the task. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their coordination with the teacher is from 50 to 69%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. Perhaps all the issues of urban planning have not been solved rationally enough. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the master plan is partially or formally interconnected with the natural landscape. The environment of residential education and the community center partially reflects architectural and typological features. 4. Graphic presentation of the project at a satisfactory architectural and artistic level is allowed. | 1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the task. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their coordination with the teacher ranges from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project are executed competently, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. The issues of urban planning design have been comprehensively, rationally and creatively solved 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the master plan has been developed in harmonious relationship with the natural landscape. The environment of residential education and community center reflects the typological features of the architecture of urban settlements. 4. The graphic presentation of the project is made in the same style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of practical classes
- Introductory lecture "Residential area
- Architectural and landscape analysis of the territory (scheme M 1:5000), scheme of planning restrictions
- Defining the boundaries and location of the neighborhood
- Development of a sketch of the general plan of the microdistrict in M 1:1000
- Adjustment of the sketch of the master plan with the solution of transport and pedestrian traffic, placement of cultural and consumer services, landscaping
- Sketch of the spatial solution of the development of the microdistrict
- Spatial solution of the building
- Development of a master plan in M 1:1000, the balance of the territory, technical and economic indicators of development
- Development of schemes for the organization of cultural and consumer services, transport and pedestrian traffic, landscaping
- Correction of graphic material, layout on tablets
- The community center of a residential area
- Calculation of objects of cultural and consumer services of a residential area, the balance of the territory
- Developing a sketch of an idea
- Development of transport and pedestrian traffic schemes, functional zoning
- Architectural and planning solution of a public service facility (trade, catering) with landscaping of the adjacent territory
- Architectural and spatial structure of the community center
- Graphic design of the project using professional graphic programs
Key reading
- Svod printsipov kompleksnogo razvitiya gorodskih territoriy. Kniga 1. – M.: STRELKA MAG, 2019. – 296 s.
- Gradostroitelstvo i planirovka naselennyih mest/A.V. Sevostyanov, N.G. Konokotin, L.A. Krants i dr.; - M., Kolos S, 2012. – 398 s.
- Kozlov M.V. «Osnovyi gradostroitelstva», elektronnoe uchebnoe posobie, VKGTU, 2010;
Further reading
- Iodo I.A., Potaev G.A. «Gradostroitelstvo i territorialnaya planirovka», Rostov-na-Donu, 2008
- Kositskiy Ya.V. i dr., «Osnovyi teorii planirovki i zastroyki gorodov», M., 2007;
- SP RK 3.01-101-2013 «Gradostroitelstvo. Planirovka i zastroyka gorodskih i selskih naselennyih punktov»
- Lezhava I.G. Vektor gradostroitelnoy evolyutsii.- zh.: «Gradostroitelstvo», #3,2010, s.47-52. 2.
- Krasheninnikov A.V. Gradostroitelnoe razvitie zhiloy zastroyki: issledovanie opyita zapadnyih stran: Ucheb.posobie. – M.: «Arhitektura-S», 2005. – 112 s.
- Krasheninnikov A.V. Gradostroitelnoe razvitie zhiloy zastroyki: issledovanie opyita zapadnyih stran: Ucheb.posobie. – M.: «Arhitektura-S», 2005. – 112 s.
- Glazyichev V.L. Politicheskaya ekonomiya goroda: ucheb.posobie. – M.: Izdatelstvo «Delo» ANH, 2009. – 192 s.
