HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Design and engineering 4

Komlev Sergey Valentinovich

Description: Interior design of a residential apartment includes the development of proposals for functional organization, reconstruction and redevelopment; formation of object equipment and color solutions for the interior, based on an analysis of the socio-demographic structure of the family and scenario modeling.

Amount of credits: 5

Пререквизиты:

Design and engineering 3

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	45
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Course Project
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	Course project, creative exam - clauze.

Component: University component

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal

- master the methodology of designing and reconstructing residential interiors.

Objective

be able to assess the existing and newly designed residential environment, socio-demographic and scenario modeling;
master the basics of organizing a residential interior using compositional, planning and technological means;
master the selection of object equipment, style and color solutions for the interior.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

know the features of the social and functional organization of the design object; understand the relationship between the socio-demographic stages of family development and the functional and planning structure of the apartment’s interior;

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

formulate requirements for the functional-planning and architectural-artistic organization of the facility;

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

determine the style-forming elements in the architectural and artistic design of the interior;

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

master professional terminology and methods of argumentation of applied architectural and artistic solutions;

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

have the skills to independently collect information, analyze and extensively search for information on the problem of interest, process the data obtained to make a comprehensive design decision.

Teaching methods

constructing scenarios for the development of various situations with given conditions; graphic and layout modeling; practical exercises using Internet resources.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Technical specification file. Presentation file with photographs of completed sections. Presentation contents: - socio-demographic characteristics of the family; - basic plan with dimensions; - clause on the image in the layout; - clause on the image in graphics; - plan M1:50 with arrangement of furniture and equipment; - sketches of three functional areas with detail; - sketches of the matrix of subject equipment.	0-100
2 rating	Demonstration model S 1:20 (S 1:25). Identification of architectural, artistic and functional planning solutions. Concept of color solution.	0-100
2 rating	Matrix of subject equipment. A comprehensive solution of typological fragments of the apartment interior. Coloristic solution for the interior. Interior lighting.	0-100
Total control	Exam, Course Project	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Practical work	- completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creatively.	- completion of work on time and in the amount of 70 to 89% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly, but may contain minor errors that can be easily corrected by correction; - aesthetics of work design at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work not on time and in the amount of 50 to 69% in accordance with the task; - some tasks were completed incorrectly (but not more than 50%), may contain errors that can be corrected; - aesthetics of work design at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creatively.
Course project	1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project were completed correctly, in accordance with regulatory requirements and technical specifications. The issues of residential interior design are solved comprehensively, rationally and creatively. 3. The theoretical and practical fundamentals of apartment planning have been mastered; redevelopment and reconstruction of secondary housing stock. The architectural, compositional and functional planning solution was developed competently, expressively and worked out in full.4. The graphic presentation of the project is made in the same style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level.	1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 70 to 89%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements and technical specifications. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the apartment’s interior can be more actively expressed by style-forming elements. 4. It is allowed to present the project graphically using different stylistic techniques that do not impede the perception of the project, at a good architectural and artistic level.	1. The topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 50 to 69%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements and technical specifications. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. The functional and planning structure of the interior is not sufficiently comprehensive and rationally resolved. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the style-forming elements is not sufficiently expressed. 4. Graphic presentation of the project at a satisfactory architectural and artistic level is allowed.	1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project were completed correctly, in accordance with regulatory requirements and technical specifications. The issues of residential interior design are solved comprehensively, rationally and creatively. 3. The theoretical and practical fundamentals of apartment planning have been mastered; redevelopment and reconstruction of secondary housing stock. The architectural, compositional and functional planning solution was developed competently, expressively and worked out in full.4. The graphic presentation of the project is made in the same style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level.
Creative exam clauze.	The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%.	The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered in full. The arrangement of clause elements with a slight violation of scale and compositional integrity. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is slightly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a good level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 70 to 89%.	The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered to a greater extent. The arrangement of the elements of the clause has violations of scale and compositional integrity, and the depth of elaboration is insufficient. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is significantly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a satisfactory level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 50 to 69%.	The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

Issue of task
Analysis of functional processes
Layout
Development of the compositional basis of the plan
Matrix of subject equipment
Clarification of the functional-technological and figurative-compositional solution
Clarification of the layout
Interior lighting concept
Identification of style-forming elements
Formation of the project composition
Detailed design solution
Development of a demo layout
Graphic design of the project
Exhibition of projects

Key reading

Adams Sh. Slovar tsveta dlya dizainerov / Sh. Adams. — M.: KoLibri, 2018. — 272 c.
ArCon:Vizualnaya Arkhitektura:Luchshii dizainer intererov kvartir i ofisov [Elektronnyi resurs] : uchebnoe posobie. - M. : EVROSOFT, B. g.. - 1 CD-ROM.
Nartya V. I., Suindikov E. T. Osnovy konstruirovaniya obektov dizaina. Uchebnoe posobie. — M.: Infra-Inzheneriya, 2019. — 264 c.

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan