Design and engineering 8
Description: Practical development of the methodology of conceptual design design of urban public space improvement in accordance with its typology, socio-functional content, ergonomic parameters, historical and cultural significance, with the latest approaches and technologies in urban environment improvement.
Amount of credits: 7
Пререквизиты:
- Design and engineering 7
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | |
| Practical works | 75 |
| Laboratory works | |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 105 |
| Course Project | |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | Course project |
Component: University component
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- Familiarization with the principles and modern approaches to the improvement of urban public spaces and practical development of the methodology of conceptual design design.
Objective
- Get acquainted with the materials on the domestic and foreign experience of urban public space improvement.
- Urban planning analysis of the situation.
- To develop a social and functional program and design the concept of urban public space improvement.
- Develop the improvement of public space, including equipment, in accordance with ergonomic parameters, as well as functional, constructive, aesthetic and environmental expediency.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- - knowledge and understanding of the social basis for the formation of architecture, the features of the relationship between architecture and the environment;
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- - application of knowledge of compositional laws in the formation of architectural objects;
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- - formation of professional judgments based on analysis of urban development situation and development of social and functional program;
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- - communicative abilities based on knowledge of compositional laws, characteristics of building materials, professional vocabulary;
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- - skills of compositional analysis for independent execution of simple architectural projects.
Teaching methods
- construction of scenarios for the development of various situations with given conditions; Graphical and layout modeling practical exercises using Internet resources and neural networks.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Mockup Clauze | 0-100 |
| Scenario modeling | ||
| Determination of means and methods of landscaping | ||
| Graphic modeling and working layout | ||
| Methods and means of organizing lighting | ||
| Matrix of subject equipment | ||
| 2 rating | Highlighting style-forming elements | 0-100 |
| Project detailing in 3D modeling programs | ||
| Layout sketch | ||
| Development of 3D visualization | ||
| Total control | Exam, Course Project | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Course project | 1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project were completed correctly, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. The issues of designing the urban environment have been solved comprehensively, rationally and creatively. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the selected fragment of the urban environment is developed in harmonious relationship with the urban planning situation and the natural landscape. The planning solution and material equipment of the urban environment fragment reflects the identified typological features and corresponds to the socio-functional program. 4. The graphic presentation of the project is in a uniform style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level. Illustrative materials are sufficiently detailed and fully executed. | 1. The composition and theme of the course project is fully consistent with the task. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their coordination with the teacher is from 70 to 89%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with a slight adjustment of the design. It is possible that certain issues of designing the urban environment have not been sufficiently rationally resolved. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the selected fragment of the urban environment can be characterized by a more formalized approach. The planning solution and material equipment of the urban environment fragment does not fully reflect the identified typological features and corresponds to the socio-functional program. 4. Graphic presentation of the project is allowed using various style techniques that do not impede the perception of the project, at a good architectural and artistic level. | 1. The topic of the course project is fully consistent with the task. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their coordination with the teacher is from 50 to 69%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with a slight adjustment of the design. Perhaps the issues of designing the urban environment have not been sufficiently comprehensively and rationally resolved. 3. The architectural and compositional solution is formally interconnected with the identified typological features and partially corresponds to the socio-functional program. 4. Graphic presentation of the project at a satisfactory architectural and artistic level is allowed. | 1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project were completed correctly, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. The issues of designing the urban environment have been solved comprehensively, rationally and creatively. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the selected fragment of the urban environment is developed in harmonious relationship with the urban planning situation and the natural landscape. The planning solution and material equipment of the urban environment fragment reflects the identified typological features and corresponds to the socio-functional program. 4. The graphic presentation of the project is in a uniform style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level. Illustrative materials are sufficiently detailed and fully executed. |
| Practical works | - completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creatively. | - completion of work on time and in the amount of 70 to 89% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly, but may contain minor errors that can be easily corrected by correction; - aesthetics of work design at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied. | - completion of work not on time and in the amount of 50 to 69% in accordance with the task; - some tasks were completed incorrectly (but not more than 50%), may contain errors that can be corrected; - aesthetics of work design at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and standard solutions are applied. | - completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creatively. |
| Creative exam clauze. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered in full. The arrangement of clause elements with a slight violation of scale and compositional integrity. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is slightly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a good level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 70 to 89%. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered to a greater extent. The arrangement of the elements of the clause has violations of scale and compositional integrity, and the depth of elaboration is insufficient. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is significantly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a satisfactory level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 50 to 69%. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of practical classes
- Issuing a task, choosing a territory
- Determination of the typology of the selected territory
- Development of the compositional basis of the plan
- Layout
- Clarification of the functional-technological and figurative-compositional solution
- Lighting and color scheme of the territory
- Identification of style-forming elements
- Development of the project composition
- Matrix of typology of space and object equipment
- Formation of the project composition
- Detailing of the design solution
- Development of 3D visualization
- Graphic design of the project
- Preparation of presentation materials
- Exhibition of projects
Key reading
- Standart kompleksnogo razvitiya territorij Respubliki Kazahstan [Tekst] . - Astana : [b. i.], 2023 - Katalog 1 : Katalog elementov i uzlov otkrytyh prostranstv : standart / pod redakciej. A. N. Abdranovoj. - 460 s.
- Standart kompleksnogo razvitiya territorij Respubliki Kazahstan [Tekst] . - Astana : [b. i.], 2023 - . Kniga 1 : Svod principov kompleksnogo razvitiya gorodskih territorij : standart / pod redakciej. A. N. Abdranovoj. - 294 s. : cv. il. - Bibliogr.: s. 289.
- Standart kompleksnogo razvitiya territorij Respubliki Kazahstan [Tekst] . - Astana : [b. i.], 2023 - . Kniga 2 : Standart razvitiya zastroennyh territorij : standart / pod redakciej. A. N. Abdranovoj. - 233 s. : cv. il. - Bibliogr.: s. 232.
- Standart kompleksnogo razvitiya territorij Respubliki Kazahstan [Tekst] . - Astana : [b. i.], 2023 - . Kniga 3 : Standart osvoeniya svobodnyh territorij : standart / pod redakciej. A. N. Abdranovoj. - 288 s. : cv. il. - Bibliogr.: s. 285.
- Standart kompleksnogo razvitiya territorij Respubliki Kazahstan [Tekst] . - Astana : [b. i.], 2023 - . Kniga 5 : Rukovodstvo po razrabotke proektov : standart / pod redakciej. A. N. Abdranovoj. - 316 s.
Further reading
- Я.Гейл "Города для людей", 2016
- Бакутис В.Э., Горохов В.А., Лунц Л.Б., Расторгуев О.С. Инженерное благоустройство городских территорий, 1979
