Foreign Language
Description: During the course students acquire practical skills of reading, listening, writing and speaking; develop practical knowledge of a foreign language necessary for practice in everyday and professionally-oriented communication. The process of foreign language learning build communicative, linguistic and socio-cultural competences.
Amount of credits: 10
Пререквизиты:
- Foreign Language
- Иностранный язык. Школьный курс
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | |
Practical works | 45 |
Laboratory works | |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
Abstract | |
Form of final control | Abstract |
Final assessment method | examination (testing) |
Component: Mandatory component
Cycle: Secondary disciplines
Goal
- Training in practical foreign language skills to apply in everyday and professional communication.
Objective
- To teach students a certain amount of linguistic skills of ethnocultural and universal character, humanization of training of future technical specialists technical.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- Building a system of knowledge with national and cultural features and realities of the country of the studied language; knowledge of the main linguistic phenomena, grammatical and syntactic structures, lexical linguistic units in a certain extent: - Vocabulary: educational models, Context meanings of polysemantic words, lexical constructions of language; in grammar: the most frequent specific grammatical phenomena of basic , humanitarian and technical sublanguages. Understanding the main ideas of clear messages made in the literary language on various topics typically arising at work, study, leisure, etc.
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- 1. Using the acquired knowledge in most everyday situations, typically arising at work, study, leisure, etc. or during the stay in the country of the studied language ; in oral and written communication, when working with foreign language literature.
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- Building critical judgments in a certain area of knowledge in a foreign language: dialogue speech - communication in most situations arising during the stay in the country of the language under study; participation without prior preparation in dialogues on a familiar/ interesting topic (e.g., «family», «hobbies», «work», «travel», «current events»). monological speech - the construction of simple coherent statements about personal impressions, events, dreams, hopes and desires; a brief justification and explanation of views and intentions; the presentation of a story or plot of a book or film and expression of attitude. Written speech - writing simple, coherent texts on familiar or interesting topics; personal letters about experiences and impressions.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- Ability to take part in conversation; explain with some pauses and descriptive expressions on topics such as family, hobbies, hobbies, work, travel and current events. Ability to use relevant constructions associated with familiar, typical situations. The ability to speak is understandable, despite the fact that pauses for search of grammatical and lexical means are noticeable, especially in statements of considerable length. The ability to start, maintain and complete a one-on-one conversation if the topics of discussion are familiar or individually relevant.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- 1. Skills in the formation of intermediate and global goals of learning a foreign language; skills of speech (reading, writing, listening, oral communication); skills of organizing independent study of language material.
Teaching methods
- Interactive practical session («Questions and Answers») - Learning Games - Reflexive approach to learning - Problem Teaching Methods - Design method - ICT search method
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | Test | 0-100 |
Work upon the text | ||
Speaking tasks | ||
Writing work | ||
Reading | ||
Listening tasks | ||
Oral interview | ||
Control work | ||
Total control | Abstract, Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
Reading | the student understands the main content of authentic texts of various genres, dialogues on familiar and partially familiar topics; extracts the most functionally significant semantic, including detailed and specific information for filling out forms, tables, answers questions about the content of the text, distinguishes fact and opinion, extracts and compares inconsistencies in texts of average volume of different genres and styles in within the framework of studied and general topics, he guesses the meaning of unfamiliar words from the context. | the student fulfilled the requirements for the grade "5", but 2-3 shortcomings were made.Read texts on general topics and understand their basic idea, despite the presence of 10% unfamiliar vocabulary, without fully understanding individual details. | the student understands the main content of authentic texts of various genres, dialogues on familiar and partially familiar topics (at least 50% of the volume), but is not able to extract meaningful semantic information, including detailed and specific information, fully enough. | the student understands the main content of authentic texts of various genres, dialogues on familiar and partially familiar topics; extracts the most functionally significant semantic, including detailed and specific information for filling out forms, tables, answers questions about the content of the text, distinguishes fact and opinion, extracts and compares inconsistencies in texts of average volume of different genres and styles in within the framework of studied and general topics, he guesses the meaning of unfamiliar words from the context. |
Speaking | the student conducts an ethical dialogue, a dialogue on an expanded topic in situations of official and informal everyday communication; uses lexical and grammatical means of language that ensure the correct linguistic design of statements, expresses an emotional and evaluative attitude to the surrounding reality, implementing pre–proposed tactics of verbal communication with their peers; analyzes and compares texts, expressing and arguing his point of view, argues, expressing his own opinion and evaluating events, opinions and problems, uses specific vocabulary on the problem during a casual conversation, evaluates statements on a certain topic, draws conclusions and suggests his own solutions to a given problem. | The student uses lexical and grammatical constructions and terms correctly; admitting some phonetic, lexical and grammatical errors that do not hinder the understanding of his speech. The scope of the statement meets the requirements, understands the questions completely, but the answers sometimes cause difficulties. | The student is able to express his point of view with a large number of phonetic, lexical and grammatical errors and repetitions that interfere with it. Both the questions and the answers are difficult. | the student conducts an ethical dialogue, a dialogue on an expanded topic in situations of official and informal everyday communication; uses lexical and grammatical means of language that ensure the correct linguistic design of statements, expresses an emotional and evaluative attitude to the surrounding reality, implementing pre–proposed tactics of verbal communication with their peers; analyzes and compares texts, expressing and arguing his point of view, argues, expressing his own opinion and evaluating events, opinions and problems, uses specific vocabulary on the problem during a casual conversation, evaluates statements on a certain topic, draws conclusions and suggests his own solutions to a given problem. |
Listening | The student understands the main content of authentic audio texts, films, dialogues on familiar and partially familiar topics; extracts the most functionally significant semantic, including detailed and specific information for filling out forms, tables, diagrams, guesses the meaning of unfamiliar words from the context. | The student does not fully understand the main content of what he has listened to, but is able to identify significant information, guess the meaning of some unfamiliar words from the context, and is able to use the information received to solve tasks. | The student does not fully understand the main content of what he has listened to, cannot distinguish individual facts from what he has listened to, can guess the meaning of 50% of unfamiliar words from the context, cannot independently use the information received to solve the tasks set. | The student understands the main content of authentic audio texts, films, dialogues on familiar and partially familiar topics; extracts the most functionally significant semantic, including detailed and specific information for filling out forms, tables, diagrams, guesses the meaning of unfamiliar words from the context. |
Writing | The student is able to draw up a plan, abstracts of written communication, edits and corrects texts of different genres in compliance with spelling and grammatical norms, complex sentences of different constructions, writes a reasoned text, a story, a personal or official business letter, an essay on a given topic. | The student is able to make a plan, abstracts of written communication, a story, a personal or official business letter, an essay on a given topic with a small number of spelling and grammatical errors that do not interfere with understanding the content. | The student is able to compose only a simple text on a given topic in one of the genres using simple grammatical structures, without complex sentences, with a significant number of spelling, lexical and grammatical errors. | The student is able to draw up a plan, abstracts of written communication, edits and corrects texts of different genres in compliance with spelling and grammatical norms, complex sentences of different constructions, writes a reasoned text, a story, a personal or official business letter, an essay on a given topic. |
Library research paper | Full compliance of the content of the abstract with the stated topic, logical presentation of the material; absence of spelling, punctuation, stylistic and other errors; complete independence of studying the material and analysis, absence of plagiarism; presentation of the abstract in the form of oral fluent speech. | Full compliance of the content of the abstract with the stated topic, logical presentation of the material; the presence of a small number of spelling, punctuation, stylistic and other errors; complete independence of the study of the material, prepared coherent oral speech. | Incomplete correspondence of the content of the abstract to the stated topic, lack of consistency and coherence of the presentation of the material; a significant number of spelling, punctuation, stylistic and other errors; lack of plagiarism; presentation of the abstract in the form of oral prepared speech. | Full compliance of the content of the abstract with the stated topic, logical presentation of the material; absence of spelling, punctuation, stylistic and other errors; complete independence of studying the material and analysis, absence of plagiarism; presentation of the abstract in the form of oral fluent speech. |
Examination Test | 90-100 % correct answers | 70-89% correct answers | 50-69 % correct answers | 90-100 % correct answers |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of practical classes
- Family in modern society
- Modern young family and its problems; types of modern families in the world
- Young family budget and main expenditure items
- Types of housing (urban, rural house, apartment)
- Modern design; architecture
- Home improvement; interior decoration
- Entertainment; travel
- Tourism; recreation and wellness
Key reading
- 1.Liz and John Soars. New Headway Fourth Edition. 2019 2.English Grammar in Use. Murphy R. - Cambridge University Press: 218 3. Oxford University Press online Resources https://elt.oup.com/student/headway/int/?cc=ro&selLanguage=en 4. Попкова Е.В.,Токтаргалиева К.М. АНГЛИЙСКИЙ ЯЗЫК, INTERMEDIATE Методические указания по английскому языку к СРОП и СРО для уровневого обучения по CEFR для студентов всех специальностей – Усть-Каменогорск, 2020
Further reading
- 1.Christina Latham-Koenig, Clive Oxenden. English File Third Edition 2.English File Third Edition, Christina Latham-Koenig, Clive Oxenden 3. English-Russian and Russian-English dictionary 4. Англо-казахский словарь = Kazakh-English dictionary С. Г. Ахметова, Ж. Б. Турсунбаева, Ж. И. Искакова, Е. Ф. Яровая. – Алматы: Мектеп. – 2020 5. Cambridge University Press Resources