Research on the operability of transport machinery
Description: The concept of operability of transport machinery. New methods and technologies in ensuring the operability of transport machinery. Methods of ensuring the elemental reliability of transport machinery. Creation of structural elements with a given reliability. Methods of ensuring the functional reliability of transport machinery. Duplication and redundancy of functional contours. Methods of ensuring the controllability of transport machinery units. Maintenance 4.0 methods for maintaining the operability of transport machinery during operation
Amount of credits: 5
Пререквизиты:
- Prognostication & Expert Judgement of Transport & Transport Engineering
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | 15 |
| Practical works | 30 |
| Laboratory works | |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 75 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 30 |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | exam |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Base disciplines
Goal
- Understand the principles of working capacity of transport equipment and master the methods of its provision at the stages of the life cycle of transport equipment
Objective
- Understand and distinguish between elementary and functional reliability of machines
- Perform mathematical modeling of technical system reliability indicators.
- Apply methods of structural redundancy of reliability of transport equipment at the manufacturing stage, methods of increasing the wear resistance and durability of working surfaces, fatigue endurance of the material of parts
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- Understand the principles of working capacity of transport equipment and master the methods of its provision at the stages of the life cycle of transport equipment. Research and create workable designs of motor vehicles
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- To create and design scientifically based designs of modern motor vehicles, to investigate their performance and evaluate the endurance of materials
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- forming judgments about the level of reliability of transport equipment
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- communication skills in the process of analytical work to assess the performance of transport equipment
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- acquisition of self-study skills and Gaining skills in the study of such disciplines
Teaching methods
Innovative technologies and analytical methods in the training of qualified specialists to ensure the operability of transport equipment Technology of problem- and project-oriented learning
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Task 1 | 0-100 |
| Task 2 | ||
| testing | ||
| 2 rating | Task 3 | 0-100 |
| Task 4 | ||
| testing | ||
| Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| training | The work was completed in full, carefully, with the necessary explanations; the initial data are given; calculation results, units of measurement; conclusions. | The work was completed in full with minor comments, neatly; with the necessary explanations; the initial data are given; calculation results, units of measurement; conclusions. | The work was done with errors, not carefully enough; there are no necessary explanations; no source data; calculation results, units of measurement or conclusions. | The work was completed in full, carefully, with the necessary explanations; the initial data are given; calculation results, units of measurement; conclusions. |
| testing | 100-90% correct answers | 89-70% correct answers | 69-50% correct answers | 100-90% correct answers |
| exam | 1. Correct and complete answers to all theoretical questions are given; 2. The problem is completely solved; 3. The material is presented competently in compliance with a logical sequence | 1. Correct, but incomplete answers to all theoretical questions were given, minor errors or inaccuracies were made; 2. The problem was solved, but a minor error was made; 3. The material is presented competently in compliance with logical sequence. | 1. The answers to theoretical questions are correct in principle, but incomplete, there are inaccuracies in formulations and logical errors; 2. The problem is solved, but not completely; 3. The material is presented correctly, but the logical sequence is broken. | 1. Correct and complete answers to all theoretical questions are given; 2. The problem is completely solved; 3. The material is presented competently in compliance with a logical sequence |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Topic 1
- Topic 2
- Topic 3
- Topic 4
- Topic 5
- Topic 6
- Topic 7
- Topic 8
- Topic 9
- Topic 10
- Topic 11
- Topic 12
- Topic 13
- Topic 14
- Topic 15
Key reading
- 1. Quantifying Operability of Working Machines. 2011. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.1.4702.0004 Reno Filla
- 2. Мороз С.М. Методы обеспечения работоспособного технического состояния автотранспортных средств. Учебник. — М.: МАДИ, 2015. — 204 с. ISBN 978-5-7962-0156-5
- 3. Шишмарев В.Ю. Надежность технических систем. М.: Издательский центр "Академия". 2010. 304 с. ISBN 978-5-7695-6251-8
Further reading
- 4. R. Filla, "Study of a method for assessing operability of working machines in physical and virtual testing", Int. J. Veh. Syst. Modelling Testing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 209-234, 2012.
