HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Kazakh(Russian) Language

Baybatanova Farida Iliasovna

Description: During the course, students will fully study the grammar of the Kazakh language and enrich their language skills. Mastering the lexical and terminological minimum in the specialty. Development of communication means characteristic of individual small styles; development of reading and listening skills and entrepreneurship, training in the creation of various scientific texts, examples of word formation.

Amount of credits: 10

Пререквизиты:

Kazakh(Russian) Language
Казахский (русский) язык. Школьный курс

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	45
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Abstract
Form of final control	Abstract
Final assessment method

Component: Mandatory component

Cycle: Secondary disciplines

Goal

Teaching the subject of Kazakh language in accordance with the international standard of language teaching in higher and (or) secondary educational institutions of the Republic of Kazakhstan, increasing the significance and importance of Kazakh as the state language, teaching future specialists the Kazakh language in scientific and social life, developing the ability to use it as a means of communication in the cultural and political spheres.

Objective

1) development and further improvement of the student's language skills in the Kazakh language;
2) to discover the variety of stylistic possibilities of the Kazakh language in different functional styles, ways of effective communication in different communicative situations;
3) to provide a general understanding of the norms of the Kazakh language at the level of morphology, syntax, word usage, to show the originality of the current speech situation;
4) to expand the active vocabulary of students, and to increase the activity of using it, to show the richness of the Kazakh vocabulary and phraseology, to introduce various dictionaries and handbooks that show the interaction of language and culture;
5) development of the ability to recognize, analyze, compare, and classify linguistic phenomena and facts taking into account their various interpretations; commenting on linguistic phenomena if necessary; assessment of linguistic phenomena and facts from the point of view of normativity, correspondence to the field and situation of communication;
6) learn to use the acquired knowledge and skills in one's speech practice, including in the field of professionally oriented communication; improvement of normative and purposeful use of language in various spheres and situations of communication.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

read and understand different types of text in different genres, main and auxiliary distinguish information, analyze and differentiate semantic parts in texts, formulate the main idea, describe the final sections of the text as a whole and its individual structural elements;

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

using the most common grammar units in use, freely engage in various speech situations in the domestic, educational, social, cultural, professional spheres, participate in interviews, support, request the necessary information;

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

. demonstrate competence in the conditions of personal, social and professional communication in accordance with the specifics of the language, culture, sphere of communication; discuss cultural and socially significant issues in discussions, express their point of view, defend it in a reasoned manner, critically evaluate the opinion of the interlocutors

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

1. to request and provide information relevant to the situation in the relationship, to evaluate the actions of the participants in the conditions of communication using information as a means of influencing the interlocutor

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

1. learn how to write correspondence in the Kazakh language for various purposes, write articles, annotations, theses, types of articles, types of essays according to their interests;

Teaching methods

1. Problem-based learning: creating problematic situations and organizing students' active activities to resolve them, as a result of which there is a creative mastery of the basics, skills, skills, mental abilities develop; 2. research methods: self-discovery through immersion in the studied problem and finding ways to solve it; 3. Technology of game methods (role-playing, business and other types of educational games): the development of cognitive activity, the presence of certain skills and abilities necessary in practice.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Understanding the information in the text.	0-100
	Find basic, additional information in the text.
	Find reference words in the text, compare similar items.
	The presentation of the text using the reference words from the text.
	Conduct a dialogue on the situation.
	Keep a diary, telling a story.
	Informing , describing information.
	To tell a little story.
	To express your opinion. To present your opinion, to give arguments.
	Description of the workplace.
	To describe, to tell in basic words.
	Narration, description of the situation.
	Интервью по теме. Написание писем через социальные сети.
	Write a short story on the structure.
	Retelling the text using the basic vocabulary.
Total control	Abstract, Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Oral survey	Comprehensive and reasonable answers are given to all the questions posed, the main thing is determined in the answers; the answers can be specific but brief, thoughts are presented in a logical sequence; he is able to independently analyze facts, events, phenomena, describe the processes of their interrelation and development	Complete, well-founded answers are given to the questions posed; the main thing is defined in the answers, the answers are mostly short, not always clear.	Basically, all the questions were answered correctly, but without the appropriate depth and foundation, the main thing stood out when answering the questions; the answers were vague and without the appropriate logical sequence; personal and additional questions were not answered. There is not enough vocabulary.	Comprehensive and reasonable answers are given to all the questions posed, the main thing is determined in the answers; the answers can be specific but brief, thoughts are presented in a logical sequence; he is able to independently analyze facts, events, phenomena, describe the processes of their interrelation and development
Written Work/Essay	It meets all the requirements, along with scientific novelty and originality. The topic is fully disclosed, the author's position is clear, there are logical and reasonable conclusions. The work is designed at a high level.	Requirements such as an excellent grade. In addition, students are provided with the literature presented in the curriculum of the subject. In general, the topic of the essay is disclosed; conclusions are formulated, but insufficiently substantiated; the necessary basic and additional literature is used; the author's position is not clearly expressed. Competent design.	The topic is revealed on the basis of the use of several main and additional sources; one's own position is poorly expressed, there are conclusions, but they are not substantiated; the material is presented without proper evidence. There are design flaws.	It meets all the requirements, along with scientific novelty and originality. The topic is fully disclosed, the author's position is clear, there are logical and reasonable conclusions. The work is designed at a high level.
Reading with an understanding of the main content of the read text	The original understands the main content of the text, can highlight the main idea, identify the main facts, predict the meaning of words unfamiliar from the context, using word-formation elements or by analogy with the native language.	The original understands the main content of the text, can highlight the main idea and establish individual facts. But the language forecast is not sufficiently developed, some unfamiliar words are difficult to understand, they often turn to the dictionary, the reading pace is slow.	He does not fully understand the main content of what he has read, is able to state only small facts in the text, his linguistic prediction is completely undeveloped.	The original understands the main content of the text, can highlight the main idea, identify the main facts, predict the meaning of words unfamiliar from the context, using word-formation elements or by analogy with the native language.
Work on practical (seminar) classes	The theoretical content of the course has been fully mastered, the necessary practical skills of working with the mastered material have been formed, there are educational tasks provided for in the curriculum, the training tasks have been completed, the quality of their performance was assessed by the number of points close to the maximum.	The theoretical content of the course has been fully mastered, without gaps, some practical skills of working with the mastered material are insufficient, all training tasks have been considered in the educational orientation of ylgan, none of them has been evaluated for the quality of the place with a minimum number of points, the tasks have been completed with errors.	The theoretical content of the course has been partially mastered, but it does not matter, the necessary practical skills of working with the mastered material are mainly formwork, are considered in the curriculum bagdar educational task oryndalady most are performed, some completed tasks may contain errors.	The theoretical content of the course has been fully mastered, the necessary practical skills of working with the mastered material have been formed, there are educational tasks provided for in the curriculum, the training tasks have been completed, the quality of their performance was assessed by the number of points close to the maximum.
Lexical and grammatical work	Correctly determine the meaning of lexical words, give correct definitions of linguistic concepts; determine the understanding of the material, base your opinion, apply knowledge in practice, give the necessary examples; consistently and correctly present the material from the point of view of the norms of the literary language.	One mistake makes 1-2 mistakes, which are corrected by several themselves, and 1-2 errors in the sequence of the material presented and the language structure.	He knows and understands several important / or some basic rules in determining the meaning of a word, but does not fully state the material and admits inaccuracies in defining concepts or formulating rules; cannot justify his judgments in a sufficiently deep and reasoned manner and give his examples; makes mistakes in the inconsistent presentation of the material and the linguistic design of the stated.	Correctly determine the meaning of lexical words, give correct definitions of linguistic concepts; determine the understanding of the material, base your opinion, apply knowledge in practice, give the necessary examples; consistently and correctly present the material from the point of view of the norms of the literary language.
Border control	For the work done, without errors and flaws, the tasks must be completed 100%.	At work, one gross mistake is made and no more than one or two shortcomings, no more than three shortcomings. From 70 to 89% of the tasks must be completed.	It is issued if the student has correctly completed at least 50% of the entire work or has no more than one gross error and two shortcomings, no more than one gross and one gross error, no more than three gross errors, one gross error and no more than three shortcomings, four or five shortcomings.	For the work done, without errors and flaws, the tasks must be completed 100%.
Report	All the requirements for writing and defending the work have been met: the problem has been identified and its relevance justified, a brief analysis of various approaches to the problem under consideration has been carried out and its position has been logically stated, conclusions have been formulated, the topic has been fully disclosed, volumes have been met, appearance requirements have been met, correct answers to additional questions have been given. The content of the topic is fully disclosed and the work corresponds to the theme of dawn, there are reasonable conclusions for each section; the work is done correctly, there are insignificant stylistic errors; the work was done independently, all the selected literature was analyzed and used in the work.	The basic requirements for the abstract and its defense were fulfilled, but less justified. In particular, there are inaccuracies in the presentation of the material; there is no logical sequence of reasoning; the volume of the abstract is not respected; there are gaps in the design; comprehensive answers to additional questions are not given during the defense. The work is mostly relevant to the topic or has a high volume, the conclusions are mostly consistent with the content of the section; The work is mostly done correctly, there are some inconsequential stylistic ticks and gram-positive ticks; The work was carried out mainly independently, literature was used.	The requirements partially do not meet the requirements of aitamaz.There are deviations.In particular, the topic is only partially explained; additional questions are aimed at specific errors in the answer; not a conclusion in the defense.The content of the work partially corresponds to the topic; conclusions or imperfections of the department's work in all sections	All the requirements for writing and defending the work have been met: the problem has been identified and its relevance justified, a brief analysis of various approaches to the problem under consideration has been carried out and its position has been logically stated, conclusions have been formulated, the topic has been fully disclosed, volumes have been met, appearance requirements have been met, correct answers to additional questions have been given. The content of the topic is fully disclosed and the work corresponds to the theme of dawn, there are reasonable conclusions for each section; the work is done correctly, there are insignificant stylistic errors; the work was done independently, all the selected literature was analyzed and used in the work.
Written exam	The commonwealth of written work fully meets the requirements; there are no obvious errors; The Commonwealth is presented in a reasoned manner; the work is distinguished by the richness of the dictionary, the accuracy of the phrase. In general, there is 1 speech defect and 1-2 speech defects in the work. Allowed: -1 spelling in a row or -1 punctuation, or -1 grammar in a row of errors.	The content of the work mostly corresponds to the topic (there are minor deviations from the norm); the content is mostly reliable, but there are clear factual inaccuracies; there are minor violations of argumentativeness in the presentation of thought. In general, no more than 2 content deficiencies and from 3 to 4 speech deficiencies are allowed in the work. Allowed: 2 spelling and 2 punctuation errors, or - 1 spelling and 3 punctuation errors, or - 4 punctuation errors in the absence of spelling errors, as well as 2 grammatical errors.	There are significant deviations from the problem in the work; work is the most important thing, there is one white thing; there are some real inaccuracies; there is a wrong word. In general, no more than 4 speech defects and 5 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: 4 spelling and 4 punctuation errors, or 3 spelling errors and 5 punctuation errors, or 7 punctuation errors in the absence of spelling errors.	The commonwealth of written work fully meets the requirements; there are no obvious errors; The Commonwealth is presented in a reasoned manner; the work is distinguished by the richness of the dictionary, the accuracy of the phrase. In general, there is 1 speech defect and 1-2 speech defects in the work. Allowed: -1 spelling in a row or -1 punctuation, or -1 grammar in a row of errors.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

Lexical topic: My environment
1
A close-knit family
Management time
1
1
Lexical theme: student life
1
1
Lexical topic: work
1
Lexical topic: youth interest
1
Lexical topic: public places
1

Key reading

1. Байбатанова Ф.И. Қазақ тілі (А2 деңгейі). Оқу құралы (техникалық жоғары оқу орындарының студенттеріне арналған) – Өскемен:Д.Серікбаев атындағы ШҚТУ, 2023. -142б
2. Жаксылыкова Б.С. Қазақ тілі (В1 деңгейі). Оқу құралы (техникалық жоғары оқу орындарының студенттеріне арналған) – Өскемен: ШҚТУ, 2023. -112б
3. Бакиева Ә.К. Қазақ тілі. Оқу құралы. – Өскемен:Д.Серікбаев атындағы ШҚТУ, 2022.- 126 б.
4. Абдуова Б.С., Асанова Ұ.О. Қазақ тілі: Орыс тілді топтарға арналған оқу құралы.- Астана, 2017. -282 б.
5. Досмамбетова Г.Қ., Балабеков А.К., Бозбаева-Хунг А.Т., Хазимова Ә.Ж., Салыхова Б.О. Қазақ тілі: базалық деңгейге арналған оқулық. Ұлттық тестілеу орталығы. – Астана, 2016.

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan