Descriptive Geometry and Engineering Graphics
Description: Descriptive geometry develops the ability to analyze and synthesize spatial forms and their relationships based on graphic models of space. In the course of studying this course, the skills of depicting spatial forms on a plane and solving spatial problems using projection and graphic methods are formed. It aims at developing students' thinking.
Amount of credits: 5
Пререквизиты:
- Introduction to engineering
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | |
| Practical works | |
| Laboratory works | 45 |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | creative examination |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Base disciplines
Goal
- The purpose of the study is to provide the knowledge necessary to perform and read images of objects and objects based on parallel projection, to instill and consolidate the skills of performing various kinds of drawings in accordance with the USDD standards, to teach how to use standards and reference materials and to acquire the skills of performing drawings of varying complexity.
Objective
- As a result of studying the discipline, the student should know: -graphical methods for the representation of spatial forms on a plane; - graphical ways of solving spatial problems on the plane; - graphic methods of transformation and investigation of geometric properties of spatial forms depicted on the plane.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- Students should know: - rules for drawing up project documentation; - rules and regulations for the execution of the drawing. Students must have the following skills: - solve spatial problems in a complex drawing; - represent the spatial arrangement of parts and the principle of operation of the product according to the drawing; - carry out the drawing of the part and assembly unit; - apply USDD standards; - read and detail the drawing of the assembly unit.
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- Students of specialties should be able to use descriptive geometry: - apply knowledge in solving practical engineering problems; - to depict the spatial form on paper, i.e. to make a drawing;
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- - solve metric and positional problems of a geometric nature; - represent geometric shapes in space using graphic images; -know the technique of drawing.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- The key competencies are: - analysis of the task and initial data for the development of design documentation; the ability to promptly develop the required design documentation in accordance with current standards and norms; the ability to find organizational and managerial solutions in production situations.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- Skills: Students must have the following skills: - solve spatial problems in a complex drawing; - represent the spatial location according to the drawing; - carry out the drawing of the part; - apply USDD standards;
Teaching methods
Consistency. Diagnostic of learning objectives; Technologization of the educational process.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Plot. Tasks 1,2 (metric problem, traces of a straight line) of Plots. Tasks 3,4,5 (mutual position of straight lines) | 0-100 |
| Plot. Tasks 7, 8,9 (plane, main lines of the plane) | ||
| Projection drawing. Kinds | ||
| 2 rating | 2Epure. Tasks 1) Intersection of two flat surfaces rice. 2) Construct a plane located at a distance of 50mm from one of the flat bodies and parallel to it 3) build the height of the plane ABC | 0-100 |
| Projection drawing. cuts | ||
| Projection drawing. cross section | ||
| Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| conversation on control questions | emonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, explains logically and in order the meaning of phenomena and processes, draws reasonable conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly answer clarifying questions. | demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, logically and consistently explains the meaning of phenomena and processes, makes reasonable conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, is fluent in monologue speech, but makes minor mistakes that can be corrected independently or with little effort. correction by the teacher. | demonstrates superficial theoretical knowledge, poorly formed skills in analyzing phenomena and processes, inability to draw substantiated conclusions and give examples, has insufficient command of monologue speech, terminology, logic and consistency of presentation, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by corrections by the teacher. | emonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, explains logically and in order the meaning of phenomena and processes, draws reasonable conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly answer clarifying questions. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Topic 1
- Topic 2
- Topic 3
- Topic 4
- Topic 5
- Topic 6
- Topic 7
- Topic 8
- Topic 9
- Topic 10
- Topic 11
- Topic 12
- Topic 13
- Topic 14
- Topic 15
Key reading
- 1 Куликов В.П., Кузин А.В., Дёмин В.М. Инженерная графика. –– М.: ФОРУМ – ИН-ФРАМ, 2006. –– 366 с. 2 Гордон В.О., Семенцов-Огиевский М.А. Курс начертательной геометрии. –– М.: Высшая школа, 2007. –– 272 с. 3 Чумаченко Г.В. Техническое черчение. –– Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс, 2005. –– 341 с. 4 Чекмарев А.А. Начертательная геометрия и черчение. –– М.: Высшее образование, 2009. –– 471 с. 5 Левицкий В.С. Машиностроительное черчение и автоматизация выполнения чертежей. –– М.: Высшая школа, 2006. –– 432 с. 6 1 Чекмарёв А.А. Инженерная графика,М.,2010г.,385с.
Further reading
- Каменских Л.В., Есполова З.А. "Құрылыс сызбалары негіздері" Өскеhtмен, 2009, https://www.do.ektu.kz/Protected/TextbookService/ElBook/Design_rules_kaz_net/Data/Index.htm 2. ://www.do.ektu.kz/Protected/TextbookService/ElBook/Comp_drawing_kaz_.
