Structures of Low-Rise Residential Buildings
Description: The basics of art building, individual products and structural elements of low-rise residential buildings, the purpose and relationship of structural elements, the requirements for building elements, taking into account the specific conditions of their operation, are considered.
Amount of credits: 5
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | 15 |
Practical works | 30 |
Laboratory works | |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
Form of final control | Exam |
Final assessment method | Creative examination: theoretical questions, graphic drawings according to the given criteria. |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Base disciplines
Goal
- Master the knowledge necessary for the design of low-rise residential buildings, taking into account their design solutions in specific operating conditions.
Objective
- - To teach the design of the architectural and structural part of the building and its constituent elements; to instill in students the skills to choose progressive materials and effective structural solutions, in order to achieve the most economical options; familiarize students with the types and calculation schemes of building structures.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- - take into account the requirements that buildings must meet, as well as their individual parts;
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- - choose rational constructive systems and schemes of buildings, elements of building structures;
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- - use the main scientific and technical achievements in the field of construction equipment, technologies, structures and materials;
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- - apply the principles of architectural, construction and layout solutions for low-rise residential buildings;
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- - understand the relationship between space-planning and design solutions.
Teaching methods
When conducting training sessions, the use of the following educational technologies is envisaged: the traditional form of lectures in combination with innovative educational technologies, including interactive lectures (the use of the following active forms of learning: guided (guided) discussion or conversation; demonstration of slides or educational films).
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | Border control | 0-100 |
Practical work 1 Working with normative literature | ||
Practical work 2 Drawing work | ||
Practical work 3 Execution of completed drawings in accordance with the requirements of the task | ||
2 rating | Border control | 0-100 |
Practical work 1 Working with normative literature | ||
Practical work 2 Drawing work | ||
Practical work 3 Execution of completed drawings in accordance with the requirements of the task | ||
Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
Work in practical (seminar) classes | Сompleted the practical work in full with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all entries, drawings, drawings, graphs; correctly performs error analysis. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, is able to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines. | I fulfilled the requirements for the "5" rating, but 2-3 shortcomings were made. The student's answer to the questions meets the basic requirements for answering 5, but is given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using links with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other disciplines; one mistake or no more than two shortcomings are made, the student can correct them independently or with a little help from a teacher. | I did not complete the work completely, but at least 50% of the volume of practical work, which allows me to get the right results and conclusions; mistakes were made during the work. When answering questions, the student correctly understands the essence of the question, but in the answer there are separate problems in the assimilation of the course questions that do not prevent further assimilation of the program material; no more than one gross error and two shortcomings were made. | Сompleted the practical work in full with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all entries, drawings, drawings, graphs; correctly performs error analysis. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, is able to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Specific features of the architectural and planning structure of a low-rise single-family dwelling house
- Types of single-family dwellings depending on the area of construction
- Functional process and functional scheme of the building
- Residential building layout requirements
- Architectural and planning requirements for individual elements of a residential building
- Regulatory documents in design and construction
- The modular coordination of dimensions in construction
- Foundations
- Protection of the building from ground moisture
- Walls
- Rules for binding masonry walls
- Thermal calculation of the outer wall
- Slabs
- Wooden slabs
- Thermal calculation of the attic floor
Key reading
- 1. Ju.A. Dyhovichnyj Z.A. Kazbek-Kaziev, A.B. Marcinchik i dr. Arhitekturnye konstrukcii. Kniga I. Arhitekturnye konstrukcii malojetazhnyh zhilyh zdanij. M., izd. «Arhitektura-S», 2016. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://books.totalarch.com/n/1099
- 2. L.A. Munchak. Konstrukcii malojetazhnogo zhilogo doma (kursovoe proektirovanie) M., izd. «Arhitektura –S», 2012. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa:http://books.totalarch.com/constructions_of_low-rise_residential_building_course_design
- 3. E.V. Sysoeva Arhitekturnye konstrukcii malojetazhnyh zdanij. M., izd. «Arhitektura-S», 2012 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://books.totalarch.com/constructions_of_low-rise_residential_building_course_design
- 4. Shereshevskij I.A. Konstruirovanie grazhdanskih zdanij. – M.:Arhitektura-S, 2014. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://books.totalarch.com/construction_of_civil_buildings_shereshevsky
- 5. Budasov B.V., Georgievskij O.V., Kaminskij V.P. Stroitel'noe cherchenie. Ucheb.dlja vuzov/Pod obshh. red. O.V. Georgievskogo – M.: Strojizdat, 2012 – 456s., il [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/0539.rar
Further reading
- 6. Maklakova T.G., Nanasova S.M. Konstrukcii grazhdanskih zdanij. – M.: Associacija stroitel'nyh vuzov, 2012
- 7. Bender M.P., Bender O.A. Mnogofunkcional'nye obshhestvennye zdanija. Metodicheskie ukazanija po kursovomu proektirovaniju. VKGTU.- Ust'-Kamenogorsk, 2010g.- 116s
- 8. Bender M.P., Bender O.A. Konstrukcii zdanij i ih chertezhi. Metodicheskie ukazanija po oformleniju chertezhej zdanij. Ust'-Kamenogorsk, VKGTU, 2008. – 140s.
- 9. Pod redakciej M.V. Lisiciana i E.S. Pronina. Arhitekturnoe proektirovanie zhilyh zdanij. − Moskva, Arhitektura-S, 2006
- 10. Ә.Sh. Tәtіғұlov., Aқberdin T.Zh., Tәtіғұlov A.A. Arhitektura men zhobalau negіzderі. 5 tomdyқ. Almaty, 2005 – Rezhim dostupa: http://lib.ektu.kz/
- 11. Shereshevskij I.A. Zhilye zdanija. Konstruktivnye sistemy i jelementy dlja industrial'nogo stroitel'stva. – M.:Arhitektura-S,2005
- 12. Razaқov N. «Ғimarattar men imarattardyң құrylymdary», Astana: Foliant, 2010
- 13. Razaқov N. «Azamattyқ ғimarattardy zhobalaudyң oқu құraly», Astana: Arman PV, 2011
- Regulatory literature
- 14. SP RK 2.04-107-2013. Building Heat Engineering
- 15. SP RK 2.04-01-2017*. Construction climatology