Architectural Engineering Graphics 1
Description: The study of the laws of parallel and Central projection allows you to depict three-dimensional objects on a sheet of paper or computer monitor, developing spatial imagination – the ability to mentally represent the shape, proportions, position in space and other distinctive properties of the depicted objects, which is an integral part of the creative activity of the future specialist.
Amount of credits: 5
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | |
| Practical works | 45 |
| Laboratory works | |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | Creative exam Topic "Draw a three-dimensional composition in rectangular trimetry" |
Component: University component
Cycle: Base disciplines
Goal
- teaching the laws of drawing up drawings in the orthogonal projection system, developing spatial thinking, building perspective projections and building shadows
Objective
- development of spatial representation and imagination of constructive-geometric thinking, studying the ways of depicting spatial forms on the plane
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- knowledge of the laws, methods and techniques of projection, performing perspective projections, building shadows on orthogonal, axonometric and perspective projections
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- students should be able to use the acquired knowledge when mastering the educational material of subsequent disciplines, as well as in their future professional activities
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- the result of training will be the formation of knowledge of the basic algorithms underlying the solution of practical problems
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- acquisition of oral and written communication skills in the professional field
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- the ability to find the most optimal and rational ways of geometric constructions, the ability to display creative ideas on the drawings when creating a design model of a three-dimensional composition
Teaching methods
Consistency Diagnostics of learning goals; Technologization of the educational process.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Determine HB segment, triangle. Complete the missing plane figure projection | 0-100 |
| Building shadows of a segment of a straight line, plane | ||
| Building shadows on the frontal projection | ||
| Building shadows of volumetric composition | ||
| Draw a composition of geometric bodies in rectangular trimetry | ||
| Building shadows in rectangular isometry | ||
| 2 rating | Building perspective with one vanishing point | 0-100 |
| Building perspective with 2 vanishing points | ||
| Building perspective by the radial method | ||
| Building perspective using the grid method | ||
| Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| practical works | The completed work fully corresponds to the set task. The graphical representation has high visibility, dimensionality and scale of the image are fully complied with. The quality of drawing execution is high, the required line thickness, its uniformity and character are precisely observed. | The completed work is in accordance with the task, there may be minor deviations that do not affect the correctness of the solution.The graphic representation is clear, the dimensionality and scale of the image are observed, there may be minor deviations that do not affect the correctness of the solution.The quality of drawing execution is good, mainly observed line thickness, its uniformity and character. | The executed work mostly corresponds to the set task, there may be deviations, slightly affecting the correctness of the solution.The graphic representation is not fully clear, in the dimensionality and scale of the image, there may be minor deviations, slightly affecting the correctness of the solution.The quality of drawing execution is satisfactory, it is possible that the thickness of the line, its uniformity and character are not observed. | The completed work fully corresponds to the set task. The graphical representation has high visibility, dimensionality and scale of the image are fully complied with. The quality of drawing execution is high, the required line thickness, its uniformity and character are precisely observed. |
| exam | The work is done independently, according to the regulations. The composition of the drawing is harmoniously arranged on the format. The graphic task has been solved to the full extent. The quality of drawing execution is at a high quality level. | The work is done independently, according to the regulations. The composition of the drawing is mostly harmoniously placed on the format, there may be elements that slightly affect the composition of the graphic solution. The graphical problem is solved correctly, there may be minimal flaws that do not affect the correctness of the solution of the creative problem. The quality of drawing execution is good. | The work is done independently, according to the regulations. In the composition of the drawing there are elements that violate the harmonious perception of the work. The course of the solution of the graphical problem reflects the right direction of thought, but is not fully completed. There may be shortcomings that affect the correctness of the solution of the creative problem. The quality of drawing execution is satisfactory. | The work is done independently, according to the regulations. The composition of the drawing is harmoniously arranged on the format. The graphic task has been solved to the full extent. The quality of drawing execution is at a high quality level. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of practical classes
- Topic number 1 Projection methods
- Topic number 2 Shadows in orthogonal projections
- Topic number 3 Building shadows in orthogonal projections using secondary projection
- Topic number 4 Shadows of a circle, bodies of revolution in orthogonal projections
- Topic number 5 Axonometry
- Topic number 6 Rectangular isometry
- Topic number 7 Rectangular trimetry
- Topic number 8 Shadows in perspective
- Topic number 9 Perspective
- Topic number 10 Perspective
- Topic number 11 Perspective
- Topic number 12 Perspective
- Topic number 13 Perspective
- Topic number 14 Perspective
- Topic number 15 Perspective
Key reading
- 1. Balyagin S.N. Chercheniye: Spravochnoye posobiye. M. 2014. 2. Klimukhin A.G. Nachertatel'naya geometriya. M. «Arkhitektura – S» 2016. 3. Koroyev YU.I. Nachertatel'naya geometriya. M. Knorus 2015. 4. Koroyev YU.I. Nachertatel'naya geometriya. M. «Arkhitektura – S» 2015. 5. Orsa YU.N. Koroyev YU.A. Sbornik zadach i zadaniy po nachertatel'noy geometrii. - M. Arkhitektura – S 2016.
Further reading
- 6. Borisova V.A. Methodological instructions for solving problems. - EKSTU, 2019. 7. Pavlova A.A. Glazkova I.V. Descriptive geometry. - M. Vlados 2017. 8. Chekmarev A.A. Descriptive geometry and drawing. - M. Yurait-Izdat, 2016
