Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Modern Problems of Residential and Pulic Buildings Design

Inozemtseva Tatiana Alexandrovna

Description: This course is part of the module "Module architecture of residential and public buildings". The discipline is a General theoretical aspects of modern problems of design of residential and public buildings and is designed to deepen knowledge and professional skills in the field of architectural design. Within the discipline deals with design features of a unique architectural objects, which do not have standard architectural, engineering and urban planning solutions based on the use of modern trends and technologies in the field of architecture and construction taking into account the formation of a comfortable environment for people with limited mobility and in conditions of high seismic and features of reconstruction of residential and public buildings.

Amount of credits: 5

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures	30
Practical works	15
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	Creative exam - The exam ticket includes two theoretical questions on the sections of the discipline and one graphic creative task.

Component: Component by selection

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal

Familiarization with the main problems of design of residential and public buildings, with possible options for their solutions, with social requirements, modern trends and technologies in the field of architecture and construction

Objective

to familiarize with the features of the design of unique civil buildings that do not have standard architectural, engineering and urban solutions, based on the use of modern trends and technologies in the field of architecture and construction
reveal features of the socio-functional organization of residential and public buildings in modern conditions
To reveal the modern specifics of the formation of residential and public architecture
To familiarize with the methods and techniques of architectural design of residential and public buildings in conditions of increased seismicity
Consider possible options for designing a comfortable environment for people with low mobility

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

understand the peculiarities of the design of non-standard solutions of civil buildings
know the specifics of designing earthquake-resistant buildings
Know how to reconstruct buildings and historic buildings
explain the features of social and functional organization of residential and public buildings in modern conditions

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

Design aesthetically pleasing, comfortable and safe architectural objects
to use the studied techniques and means of reconstruction in the organization and preservation of historic buildings

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

Locate, accumulate, and evaluate information needed in the learning process. Literate, proofread, edit, and publish what you have learned.

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

Willingness to present information, ideas, problems, and solutions before an audience and subject matter experts.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

independently apply the acquired knowledge and skills in the current level of academic activity, in the transition to the second level of higher education (master's degree), as well as in professional activities.

Teaching methods

Problem- and project-oriented learning technologies

technologies of educational and research activities

Communicative technologies (discussion, press conferences, brainstorming, academic debates, and other active forms and methods)

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Technical and economic analysis of the design solution of a residential building	0-100
	Factor analysis of atrium space
	Planning diagrams of exhibition scenarios
2 rating	Structure of the abstract	0-100
	Table of analogues
	Defense of the essay
Total control	Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Practical work	The work is completed in full (90-100%), without errors and in compliance with the necessary sequence of actions; tables, figures, drawings, are executed accurately; analyses are performed without errors. In the work the student demonstrates the connection between the material learnt and previously learnt material, and also with the material learnt during the study of other disciplines.	The work is completed in the volume of 70-89% . Fulfilled the requirements for evaluation "excellent", but admitted 2-3 shortcomings, which the student can correct independently or with a little help from the teacher. teacher. The work does not trace links with previously studied material and material learnt in the study of other disciplines.	The work has not been completed The work is incomplete, but not less than 50 per cent of the practical work, which allows to obtain correct results and conclusions; in the course of carrying out the work mistakes were made mistakes. The learner correctly understands the essence of the task, but there are some problems in the assimilation of the issues of the course, not preventing further assimilation of the programme. hindering further learning of the programme material; made no more than one gross error and two mistakes	The work is completed in full (90-100%), without errors and in compliance with the necessary sequence of actions; tables, figures, drawings, are executed accurately; analyses are performed without errors. In the work the student demonstrates the connection between the material learnt and previously learnt material, and also with the material learnt during the study of other disciplines.
Control work (combined tests)	90-100% дұрыс жауаптар. жұмысқа қойылады, орындалған жоқ қателер мен кемшіліктер.	70-89% correct answers. No more than no more than three deficiencies are allowed.	50-69% of correct answers. No more than four to five mistakes	90-100% дұрыс жауаптар. жұмысқа қойылады, орындалған жоқ қателер мен кемшіліктер.
Емтихан	Білім алушы материалды толық, дұрыс, қисынды және дәйекті түрде баяндайды, жүйелі теориялық білімді көрсетеді, терминологияны еркін меңгереді, дәлелді жасайды қорытындылар мен жалпылау мысалдар келтіреді, ұсынылған материалды дұрыс салынған сызбалар мен сызбалармен, эскиздермен сүйемелдейді. Нақтылау сұрақтарына тез жауап береді.	The student presents the material correctly, logically and consistently, demonstrates good theoretical knowledge, conclusions and generalisations, gives examples, but at the same time makes minor errors, which are corrected independently or with minor correction by the teacher. Accompanies the material presented with competently constructed diagrams. In response to additional questions allows inaccuracies, corrected by the student with the help of the teacher. with the help of the teacher.	The student demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, shows poorly formed skills of analysis, insufficient ability to make reasoned conclusions and give examples, shows insufficient fluency in terminology, makes mistakes that can be corrected only when corrected by the teacher. It is difficult to illustrate the presented material with schemes and sketches.	Білім алушы материалды толық, дұрыс, қисынды және дәйекті түрде баяндайды, жүйелі теориялық білімді көрсетеді, терминологияны еркін меңгереді, дәлелді жасайды қорытындылар мен жалпылау мысалдар келтіреді, ұсынылған материалды дұрыс салынған сызбалар мен сызбалармен, эскиздермен сүйемелдейді. Нақтылау сұрақтарына тез жауап береді.
abstract	All the requirements for writing and defence of the essay are fulfilled: the problem is outlined and its relevance is justified, a brief analysis of various points of view on the problem under consideration is made and one's own position is logically stated, conclusions are formulated, the topic is fully disclosed, the volume is maintained, the requirements for external design are met, and correct answers to additional questions are given. The content of the topic is fully disclosed, and the work corresponds to the chosen topic, there are reasonable conclusions for each section; the work is designed correctly, there are insignificant stylistic errors; the work is done independently, all the selected literature is analysed and used in the work.	The basic requirements for the abstract and its defence are fulfilled, but there are deficiencies. In particular, there are inaccuracies in the presentation of the material; there is no logical consistency in judgements; the volume of the abstract is not maintained; there are omissions in the design; incomplete answers to additional questions in the defence. The content of the work mainly corresponds to the topic or its volume is overestimated, the conclusions mainly correspond to the content of the section; the work is basically correct, there are insignificant stylistic and grammatical errors; the work was performed mainly independently, the literature was used	There are significant deviations from the requirements and abstract. In particular, the topic is covered only partially; there are factual errors in the content of the abstract or in answering additional questions; there is no conclusion during the defence. The content of the work partially corresponds to the topic; conclusions are not made for all sections of the work or partially correspond to the content of the section, or there are no conclusions on the given data; the work is basically correct, there are significant stylistic and grammatical errors, there is carelessness in the design of the work: no margins, no numbering of pages, the work required constant assistance from the teacher, the literature was used partially.	All the requirements for writing and defence of the essay are fulfilled: the problem is outlined and its relevance is justified, a brief analysis of various points of view on the problem under consideration is made and one's own position is logically stated, conclusions are formulated, the topic is fully disclosed, the volume is maintained, the requirements for external design are met, and correct answers to additional questions are given. The content of the topic is fully disclosed, and the work corresponds to the chosen topic, there are reasonable conclusions for each section; the work is designed correctly, there are insignificant stylistic errors; the work is done independently, all the selected literature is analysed and used in the work.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of lectures

Technical and economic evaluation of design solutions for residential buildings
Features of the design of unique objects
Features of the design of unique objects
Features of the design of unique objects
Architectural and planning organization of retail and pedestrian spaces
Features of the design of public transport complexes
Architectural design of earthquake-proof buildings
Theoretical foundations of reconstruction
Principles and methods of practical solutions for reconstruction
Reconstruction of public buildings based on the volumetric and technical characteristics of the object
Integrated reconstruction of residential buildings
General provisions for the reconstruction of new residential buildings
Engineering and structural issues of reconstruction
Designing a barrier-free environment

Key reading

1. Kozlov M.V Teoriya gradostroitel'stva: Uchebnoe posobie. (2-e izd. dop.). Almaty: TOO "Medet Group", 2021.-182 s.
2. Lisitsian M.V., Fedyaeva N.A. Pronin E.S. Arkhitekturnoe proektirovanie zhilykh zdanii. – Stereotip. izd. - M.: «Arkhitektura -S», 2016. – 592 s.
3. Rekomendatsii po proektirovaniyu obshchestvenno-transportnykh tsentrov (uzlov) v krupnykh gorodakh.- TsNIIP gradostroitel'stva gosstroya Rossii, 2007.
4. 8. Fedorov V.V. Rekonstruktsiya i restavratsiya zdanii: Uchebnik – M.: INFRA-M, 2009. – 208 s.
5. KAZGOR. Proekty. – Almaty: Izdatel'stvo «Basbaqan, 2019 – 368 s.

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan