Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Architectural Design III

Feoktistova Elena Alexandrovna

Description: The principles of urban design of small settlements are mastered, The specific features of the architectural, planning and functional organization of rural settlements, taking into account a set of socio-economic, environmental and aesthetic factors in modern societal development, and the students acquire practical skills in the functional and architectural-compositional organization the of the village.

Amount of credits: 7

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	75
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	105
Course Project
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	The examination is conducted in the form of a comprehensive defence with the presentation of graphic materials, explanatory memorandum and layout. The examination assesses the content and presentation of the report and the answers to the questions of the examination board.

Component: University component

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal

Mastering the specifics and methods of urban design of a small settlement. In the course of the subject of architectural design the student must learn how to conduct an urban pre-project analysis of the territory, determine the social and functional life programme of the settlement and implement the master plan of the settlement for 2.0 - 2.2 thousand inhabitants.

Objective

to study the normative and methodological literature on urban planning in small communities;
Conduct an analysis of the natural-climatic and landscape factors and identify The area to be built on;
Define a socio-functional programme for the settlement under the present socio-economic conditions;
Master the methods of urban planning;
To develop a master plan of the settlement for 2.0-2.2 thousand residents with three types of residential buildings (sectional, semi-detached and mansion houses) on the basis of integrated solution of the issues of architectural composition, functional zoning, organization of public services, transport and pedestrian traffic, landscaping and engineering equipment to create the most favourable conditions for life and recreation of residents.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

Understand key architectural concepts and terms in the design of small communities;

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

Find and use the regulatory requirements for the design of small communities;
Describe and apply the development techniques of small settlements in the formation of a settlement;
Develop a socio-functional design programme for the settlement, taking into account population density, demographic composition, urban development and transport-pedestrian links;
Design a master plan for the settlement at the outline architectural design stage;
Calculate the technical and economic indicators of the master plan;

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

To carry out their own analysis of rural settlement analogues;
Know the methodology for urban design of a settlement;
Use domestic and foreign experience in the design of rural settlements in modern practice;
Solve architectural, planning, functional and compositional tasks for the design of the settlement independently;

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

Discuss the results of professional work on the design of small communities, taking into account not only technical requirements, but also human values and an ecological outlook.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

Analyse the natural landscape factors for the purposes of urban design of a small settlement.

Teaching methods

The following learning technologies are used in the training sessions: theoretical introductions to practical tasks, aimed at solving specific tasks in the course design. Video presentations and methodological handouts are used. Each student develops an individual creative project, consulting each stage of implementation with the teacher.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Practical work: Pre-project site analysis	0-100
	Practical work: Analogue analysis
	Practical work: Work with the regulatory literature
	Practical work: Sketch-idea (applique)
	Practical work: General plan sketch M 1:2000
	Practical work: Sketch layout
2 rating	Practical work: Synopsis (Winshu)	0-100
	Practical work: Transport structure of the settlement (street profiles)
	Practical work: The welfare and recreation system
	Practical work: Computer-generated master plan
	Practical work: Schemes (functional zoning, transport and pedestrian connections, landscaping)
	Practical work: Rectangles, perspective
	Practical work: Explanatory note
	Practical work: Composition
	Practical work: Layout
Total control	Exam, Course Project	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
The exam is conducted in the form of a comprehensive defense with the presentation of graphic materials, an explanatory note and a layout. The content and presentation of the report, answers to 5 questions of the examination committee are evaluated.	- The report is presented in a logical sequence, accessible, with competent use of professional terms. All questions are fully disclosed. - The time for the report has been met. - All 5 questions have been given complete, correct answers. - The explanatory note has been developed and drawn up in accordance with the requirements, in full. At least 80% anti-plagiarism has been passed.	- The report is presented with slight violations of logical sequence, accessible, with competent use of professional terms. All questions are fully disclosed. - The time for the report has been met or exceeded by 10%. - It is allowed to give an incorrect answer to one of the questions, or incomplete answers to two questions. - The explanatory note has been developed in accordance with the requirements, in the amount of at least 70%. At least 70% anti-plagiarism has been passed.	- The report is presented without logical sequence, accessible, with competent use of professional terms. Some of the issues, but not more than 50%, are not fully disclosed. - The time for the report has been met or exceeded by 20%. - It is allowed to give an incorrect answer to two questions, or incomplete answers to three questions. - The explanatory note has been developed in accordance with the requirements, in full at least 50%, anti-plagiarism has been passed at least 60%.	- The report is presented in a logical sequence, accessible, with competent use of professional terms. All questions are fully disclosed. - The time for the report has been met. - All 5 questions have been given complete, correct answers. - The explanatory note has been developed and drawn up in accordance with the requirements, in full. At least 80% anti-plagiarism has been passed.
Course project	1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the task. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their coordination with the teacher ranges from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project are executed competently, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. The issues of urban planning design of the village have been comprehensively, rationally and creatively resolved. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the master plan has been developed in a harmonious relationship with the natural landscape. The environment of the village reflects the typological features of the architecture of rural settlements. 4. The graphic presentation of the project is made in the same style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level.	1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the task. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their coordination with the teacher ranges from 70 to 89%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. Perhaps some issues of urban planning have not been solved rationally enough. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the master plan may be characterized by a more formalized approach. The environment of the settlement does not fully reflect the typological features of the architecture of rural settlements. 4. It is allowed to present the project graphically using different stylistic techniques that do not complicate the perception of the project, at a good architectural and artistic level.	1. The topic of the course project fully corresponds to the task. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their coordination with the teacher is from 50 to 69%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. Perhaps all the issues of urban planning have not been solved rationally enough. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the master plan is partially or formally interconnected with the natural landscape. The environment of the village partially reflects the features of rural architecture. 4. Graphic presentation of the project at a satisfactory architectural and artistic level is allowed.	1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the task. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their coordination with the teacher ranges from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project are executed competently, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. The issues of urban planning design of the village have been comprehensively, rationally and creatively resolved. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the master plan has been developed in a harmonious relationship with the natural landscape. The environment of the village reflects the typological features of the architecture of rural settlements. 4. The graphic presentation of the project is made in the same style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level.
Practical work	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are completed correctly; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are creatively used.	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 70 to 89% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are performed correctly, but may contain minor errors that can be easily corrected; - the aesthetics of the design of the work is at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 50 to 69% in accordance with the task; - some tasks are not completed correctly (but not more than 50%), they may contain errors that can be corrected; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and standard solutions are applied.	- completion of work on time and in the amount from 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks are completed correctly; - aesthetics of the design of the work at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are creatively used.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

Introductory lecture 'The Village'
Pre-project studies
Architectural-planning and functional structure of rural settlements
Composition of the master plan
Village infrastructure
"Filling the frame": placement and shaping of the three types of residential development, specifying plot sizes, blocking techniques and house locations
Placement of BWC facilities in the planning structure
Architectural and planning composition of the village centre village
Placement of welfare facilities in the planning structure
Techniques for graphical presentation of the master plan of the settlement
Transport system of the settlement
Layout of all project materials, refinement in computer graphics
Demonstration mock-up of the township master plan
Architectural and spatial structure and the image of the settlement
The design of the course project (including the explanatory memorandum), preparation for submission and defence

Key reading

Gradostroitelstvo i planirovka naselennyh mest / pod red. Konokotina N.G. – M.: Kolos S, 2012. – 398 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://science.totalarch.com/book/2375.rar
YAstrebova I.M. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po vypolneniyu kursovogo proekta «Poselok» po discipline «Arhitekturnoe proektirovanie»/I.M.YAstrebova– M.: MARHI, 2013. –28 p. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://marhi.ru/sveden/files/Metod_posobie_poselok_070301.pdf
Ryabkova E.B. Poselok: metodicheskie ukazaniya k kursovomu proektu po arhitekturnomu proektirovaniyu dlya studentov special'nosti «Arhitektura» / sost. E. B. Ryabkova. – Habarovsk : Tihookean. gos. un-ta, 2012. – 48 p. - [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://pnu.edu.ru/media/filer_public/53/d8/53d89241-27e7-4f53-b6d1-347b74be45fe/31.pdf

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan