HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Architectural Design VI

Gurskaya Oxana Evgenyevna

Description: The features of the functional planning organization and spatial composition of the school building are considered, the identification of the architectural and artistic image taking into account the social orientation of the object. The discipline has a practical orientation and creates theoretical prerequisites for solving a wide range of professional tasks in the field of designing educational facilities.

Amount of credits: 5

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	45
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Course Project
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	Creative examination in the form of a graphic clause

Component: University component

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal

Familiarisation with the theoretical prerequisites for designing structures with a honeycomb structure, application of design norms for children's educational institutions, mastering the relevant skills of practical design of objects of a functional and technological nature in the design of educational buildings and defending the design solution with arguments.

Objective

to study the regulatory and technological features of the design of educational facilities
formulate the concept of a functional program for designing an educational building
to develop a space-planning structure of the school taking into account the given composition of the premises, the author's concept, the organization of training, regulatory requirements (insolation, illumination, evacuation);
Create a typological image of an educational institution;
place the building on the site and organize the school territory taking into account urban planning requirements;
to develop a constructive system taking into account the use of industrial structures and building construction technology;
graphically draw up the project in accordance with regulatory requirements.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

understand the features of technological processes of educational institutions
analyze modern experience in the design of educational facilities
explain the typological features and features of the formation of educational buildings

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

formulate requirements for the functional planning and spatial organization of the object
offer flexible planning options in accordance with the technology of the object
apply construction, structural and sanitary-hygienic standards for the design of educational facilities
to offer a kind of architectural and artistic image of the object
graphically draw up a draft design in accordance with the rules for the design of architectural and construction drawings.

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

formulate requirements for the functional planning and spatial organization of the object
formulate and analyze the problems of designing educational facilities

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

in the process of course design, the student justifies his design decisions, which contributes to mastering the techniques of professional communication. In some cases, the implementation of the project by the author's team is allowed, which makes it possible to discuss in study groups, prove and defend their point of view, as well as accept and respect the point of view of another person.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

the ability to independently collect information, analyze and search for advanced information on the problem of interest, processing the data obtained to make a predictive design decision.

Teaching methods

Тechnologies of problem- and project-oriented learning

Сlausura method

Тechnologies of educational and research activities

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Practical work: Clausura on a typological image	0-100
	Practical work: Social and functional program
	Practical work: Analysis of analogs
	Practical work: Plans
2 rating	Practical work: Master plan	0-100
	Practical work: Facades, section
	Practical work: Layout
Total control	Exam, Course Project	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Practical work	- fulfillment of work on time and in the volume from 90 to 100% in accordance with the assignment; - all tasks are performed competently, taking into account the relevant regulatory requirements; - when performing work, the student shows knowledge of theoretical material, the ability to analyze - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - creative use of previously acquired skills and knowledge with elements of novelty.	- Completion of the work on time and in the volume of 70 to 89% in accordance with the assignment; - all tasks are completed competently, taking into account the relevant regulatory requirements, but may contain minor errors that can be easily eliminated in the correction; - the student shows knowledge of theoretical material, tries to analyse; - aesthetics of work design at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied.	- fulfilment of work not in time and in the amount from 50 to 69% in accordance with the assignment; - the tasks are performed based on the relevant regulatory requirements some tasks are performed incorrectly (but not more than 50%), may contain errors that can be eliminated by correction; - when performing works, the student shows limited knowledge of theoretical material; - aesthetics of work design at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and typical solutions are applied.	- fulfillment of work on time and in the volume from 90 to 100% in accordance with the assignment; - all tasks are performed competently, taking into account the relevant regulatory requirements; - when performing work, the student shows knowledge of theoretical material, the ability to analyze - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - creative use of previously acquired skills and knowledge with elements of novelty.
Course project	1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project are completed competently, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. Comprehensive, rational and creative solution of the school building design issues. 3. Architectural-composition and functional-planning solution is developed creatively, competently, expressively and fully worked out. The design of the school building reflects the typological features of the architecture of children's educational facilities. 4. Competent constructive solution is proposed, in accordance with the volumetric and spatial structure of buildings, is well traced in the elements of the project. 5. The master plan of the site is made taking into account all zones of the school territory and normative requirements and recommendations for them, including carriageways and pedestrian connections. 6. The graphic presentation of the project is in a uniform style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level.	1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their agreement with the teacher from 70 to 89%. 2. The project is executed in accordance with the normative requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 normative requirements are allowed, easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. 3. The architectural and composition solution of the school building may be characterised by a more formalised, typical approach. The school project does not fully reflect typological peculiarities. 4. The project uses a typical structural solution. 5. The master plan of the site has been executed in compliance with the regulatory requirements. Minor errors are allowed, which do not affect the dimensions and general solution of the master plan. 6. The project can be presented graphically using different style techniques that do not hinder the perception of the project, at a good architectural and artistic level.	1. the topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of the project elements and their agreement with the teacher from 50 to 69%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with the regulatory requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 normative requirements are allowed, easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. Probably, the functional-planning structure of the object is not sufficiently complex and rationally solved. 3.The architectural and composition solution of the school building is formal. The project partially reflects typological features of the school building architecture. 4. The project uses a typical design solution with errors that do not affect the changes in the basic concept of the project. 5. The school building is located on the site with the fulfilment of normative requirements, functional zones of the territory are not specified, passages are made with violation of pedestrian connections are absent. 6. The graphic presentation of the project is acceptable at a satisfactory architectural and artistic level.	1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project are completed competently, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. Comprehensive, rational and creative solution of the school building design issues. 3. Architectural-composition and functional-planning solution is developed creatively, competently, expressively and fully worked out. The design of the school building reflects the typological features of the architecture of children's educational facilities. 4. Competent constructive solution is proposed, in accordance with the volumetric and spatial structure of buildings, is well traced in the elements of the project. 5. The master plan of the site is made taking into account all zones of the school territory and normative requirements and recommendations for them, including carriageways and pedestrian connections. 6. The graphic presentation of the project is in a uniform style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level.
Creative examination in the form of a graphic clause	The work is completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is disclosed in depth and in full. The elements of the clause are made competently in accordance with the regulatory requirements and functional and technological features, arranged compositionally logically and consistently. The non-standard architectural solution reflects the typology of the school building. Structural solution is chosen competently, in accordance with the volumetric and spatial structure of the buildings, well traced in the elements of the project. The stylistic unity of graphic methods is fully maintained. The aesthetics of work design is at a high level. The degree of elaboration of tasks from 90 to 100%.	The work has been completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is fully disclosed. Elements of the clause are completed competently. There are allowed violations of normative and technological requirements, easily eliminated with minor adjustments. The architectural solution reflects the typology of the school building. The structural solution is traceable in the project elements. Arrangement of clause elements with a slight violation of scale and compositional integrity. The unity of graphic techniques is slightly broken. works at a good level. The degree of elaboration of tasks from 70 to 89%.	Жұмыс тапсырмаға сәйкес орындалды. Тапсырманың тақырыбы көбірек ашылды. Жобаның элементтері негізгі технологиялық талаптарға сәйкес орындалды. Архитектуралық сурет типтік шешім түрінде ұсынылған. Сындарлы шешім толығымен бақыланбайды және жоба элементтеріне сәйкес келеді. Ауқымы мен композициялық тұтастығы бұзылған Клаузура элементтерінің орналасуы, зерттеу тереңдігі жеткіліксіз. Графикалық әдістердің, кескіннің және түсіндірме мәтіннің бірлігі айтарлықтай бұзылған. Жұмысты қанағаттанарлық деңгейде жобалау эстетикасы. Тапсырмаларды пысықтау дәрежесі 50-ден 69% - ға дейін.	The work is completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is disclosed in depth and in full. The elements of the clause are made competently in accordance with the regulatory requirements and functional and technological features, arranged compositionally logically and consistently. The non-standard architectural solution reflects the typology of the school building. Structural solution is chosen competently, in accordance with the volumetric and spatial structure of the buildings, well traced in the elements of the project. The stylistic unity of graphic methods is fully maintained. The aesthetics of work design is at a high level. The degree of elaboration of tasks from 90 to 100%.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

Three-dimensional graphic clausura on the learning environment
Introductory lecture
Volumetric clausura on the typological image of the school
A sketch is an idea for the "Learning environment" of the school
Sketch of the school's planning solution
Sketch idea – "School – center of the neighborhood"
Constructive solutions of school buildings
Unification and modular coordination
Design of drawings in accordance with GOST
Layout of project materials in the format
Sketch of the school's space-planning solution in the layout
Color and visual communications

Key reading

Gel'fond A.L. Arkhitekturnoe proektirovanie obshchestvennykh zdanii i sooruzhenii: Ucheb. posobie. – M.: Arkhitektura-S, 2006.-280s.
Noifert E. Stroitel'noe proektirovanie: per.s nem. – M.: «Arkhitektura -S», 2020. – 612 s.
SP RK 3.01-101-2013Gradostroitel'stvo. Planirovka i zastroika gorodskikh i sel'skikh naselennykh punktov
СП РК 3.02-111-2012 Obshcheobrazovatel'nye organizatsii (valid for 2022)

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan