Architectural Design IX
Description: The discipline covers: practical aspects of the design of urban planning in the reconstruction of a real situation with different functional and planning structure. Topics of the course project: reconstruction of the town square; reconstruction of the ensemble of street development; reconstruction of the historically established part of the city; reconstruction of residential development.
Amount of credits: 5
Пререквизиты:
- Architectural Design VI
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | |
| Practical works | 45 |
| Laboratory works | |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
| Course Project | |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | Creative exam - clauzura |
Component: University component
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- To master the theoretical and practical foundations of the reconstruction of urban planning systems of different functional purposes.
Objective
- be able to conduct a pre-project analysis of the urban situation;
- have a technique for identifying problems with the object of reconstruction;
- master the development of a set of techniques and means of reconstruction;
- master the preparation of proposals for the functional-planning reconstruction of the object;
- master the development of volumetric solutions of building the object of reconstruction with the arrangement of the surrounding area.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- perform social and functional organization of the object in the spatial and temporal aspect based on a systematic approach;
- understand the specific features of the structural organization of the object of reconstruction;
- have knowledge of modern reconstruction and design methods;
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- Identify the problem in the design object;
- formulate requirements for functional-planning and three-dimensional organization of the object;
- model the social and functional structure of the space;
- to master the method of individualization of the architectural and artistic image of the object;
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- have skills of independent collection of information, analysis and extended search of information on the problem of interest, processing of the obtained data to make a comprehensive project decision;
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- to know the methodology of independent selection of a set of data (sociological, statistical, technical, etc.) and their substantiated analysis;
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- formulate requirements for the analysis of the design object and the task of designing the object as an element of the urban planning system.
Teaching methods
introductory information, conversations, slides and visual aids;
field survey of the territory, independent research of students in the process of learning;
solving academic problems.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Clauzure on "Reconstruction of the Urban Hub" | 0-100 |
| Functional zoning scheme | ||
| Scheme of transport and pedestrian connections | ||
| 2 rating | Sketch-idea | 0-100 |
| Layout of the reconstruction | ||
| Total control | Exam, Course Project | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Practical work | - completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creatively. | - completion of work on time and in the amount of 70 to 89% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly, but may contain minor errors that can be easily corrected by correction; - aesthetics of work design at a good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard solutions are applied. | - completion of work not on time and in the amount of 50 to 69% in accordance with the task; - some tasks were completed incorrectly (but not more than 50%), may contain errors that can be corrected; - aesthetics of work design at a satisfactory level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used without creative interpretation, standard and standard solutions are applied. | - completion of work on time and in the amount of 90 to 100% in accordance with the task; - all tasks were completed correctly; - aesthetics of work design at a high or good level; - previously acquired skills and knowledge are used creatively. |
| Creative exam - clauzura | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered in full. The arrangement of clause elements with a slight violation of scale and compositional integrity. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is slightly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a good level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 70 to 89%. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered to a greater extent. The arrangement of the elements of the clause has violations of scale and compositional integrity, and the depth of elaboration is insufficient. The unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is significantly disrupted. The aesthetics of the work is at a satisfactory level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 50 to 69%. | The work was completed in accordance with the assignment. The topic of the assignment is covered deeply and completely. The elements of the clause are arranged compositionally correctly, logically and consistently. The stylistic unity of graphic techniques, images and explanatory text is fully maintained. The aesthetics of the design of the work is at a high level. The degree of completion of tasks is from 90 to 100%. |
| Course project | 1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project were completed correctly, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. The issues of designing urban development objects in the context of reconstruction based on a real situation with different functional and planning structures were solved in a comprehensive, rational and creative manner. 3. The theoretical and practical foundations of the reconstruction of urban planning systems have been mastered. The architectural, compositional and functional planning solution was developed competently, expressively and worked out in full. 4. The graphic presentation of the project is made in the same style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level. | 1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 70 to 89%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the reconstructed urban planning site can be characterized by a more formalized approach. 4. It is allowed to present the project graphically using different stylistic techniques that do not impede the perception of the project, at a good architectural and artistic level. | 1. The topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 50 to 69%. 2. The project was carried out in accordance with regulatory requirements. Minor violations of 2-3 regulatory requirements are allowed, which can be easily eliminated with minor adjustments to the project. Perhaps the functional-planning structure of the urban reconstruction object has not been comprehensively and rationally resolved. 3. The architectural and compositional solution of the urban planning unit is formal. 4. Graphic presentation of the project at a satisfactory architectural and artistic level is allowed. | 1. The composition and topic of the course project fully corresponds to the assignment. The degree of elaboration of project elements and their agreement with the teacher is from 90 to 100%. 2. All elements of the project were completed correctly, in accordance with regulatory requirements and recommendations. The issues of designing urban development objects in the context of reconstruction based on a real situation with different functional and planning structures were solved in a comprehensive, rational and creative manner. 3. The theoretical and practical foundations of the reconstruction of urban planning systems have been mastered. The architectural, compositional and functional planning solution was developed competently, expressively and worked out in full. 4. The graphic presentation of the project is made in the same style, at a high or good architectural and artistic level. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of practical classes
- Introductory lecture
- Clauzura
- Situation analysis
- Plane layout
- Volumetric modeling
- Composition of the volume-planning structure of the building
- Search for variants
- Development of the planning structure of the object of reconstruction in the pencil
- Development of the master plan in M 1:500
- Zoning of the territory and the reconstruction object , sketch of the planning structure
- Development of plans for the object of reconstruction and development of the adjacent territory
- Material layout on the tablets, drawing on the tablets
- Layout development
- Preparation of illustrative and accompanying material
- Exhibition of projects
Key reading
- Kozlov M.V. Teoriya gradostroitel'stva: Uchebnoe posobie. (2-e izdanie, dopolnennoe). - Almaty, 2021. - 182s.
- Krasheninnikov A.V. Stsenarnoe proektirovanie gorodskoi sredy // Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. – 2017. – №4(41). – S. 242-256 [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://marhi.ru/AMIT/2017/4kvart17/18_krasheninnikov/index.php (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2022).
- KAZGOR. Proekty. – Almaty: Izdatel'stvo «Basbaqan», 2019. – 368 s.
Further reading
- Lavrov V.A. Metodika rekonstruktsii gorodov, M., «Stroiizdat», 1975
- Lavrov V.A. «Rekonstruktsiya krupnykh gorodov», M., «Stroiizdat», 1972;
- Belousov V.N., Bocharova N.N. i dr., «Rekonstruktsiya tsentrov istoricheskikh gorodov», M., «Stroiizdat», 1987;
- Bekker A.Yu., Shchenkov A.S. «Sovremennaya gorodskaya sreda i arkhitekturnoe nasledie». M., «Stroiizdat», 1986.
- Sosnovskii V.A. «Planirovka gorodov», uchebnoe posobie, M., «Vysshaya shkola», 1988;
- Moiseev Yu.M., Shimko V.T. «Obshchestvennye tsentry», uchebnoe posobie, M., «Vysshaya shkola», 1987;
- Krasheninnikov A.V. «Zhilye kvartaly», uchebnoe posobie», M., «Vysshaya shkola», 1988;
- Milovidov N.N., Orlovskii B.Ya. «Zhilye zdaniya», uchebnoe posobie», M., «Vysshaya shkola», 1987;
- Novakovskii M. "Transport i proektirovanie tsentra goroda", M., "Stroiizdat",1978
- Lyudmirskaya R.G., Potseshkovskaya I.V. «Rekonstruktsiya ob"ektov gradostroitel'nogo naslediya», uchebnoe posobie, Rostov-na-Donu, «Feniks», 2007
