Kazakh(Russian) Language
Description: This program is designed to develop the linguistic personality of a student who is able to carry out cognitive and communicative activities in Russian in the fields of interpersonal, social, professional, and intercultural communication in the context of the implementation of state programs.
Amount of credits: 10
Пререквизиты:
- Kazakh(Russian) Language
- Казахский (русский) язык. Школьный курс
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | |
Practical works | 45 |
Laboratory works | |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
Abstract | |
Form of final control | Abstract |
Final assessment method | Written exam: 1st block - closed test questions (10 min); 2nd block - open test questions (35 min); 3rd block - lexical and grammatical work with text (55 min). Duration of the exam is 1 hour 40 minutes. The examination material consists of 40% theoretical material and 60% practical material. The student has passed the module if the final grade is above 50%. |
Component: Mandatory component
Cycle: Secondary disciplines
Goal
- The purpose of the program is to form a socio-humanitarian worldview of students in the context of the national idea of spiritual modernization, which involves the development on the basis of national consciousness and cultural code of the qualities of internationalism, tolerant attitude to world cultures and languages as translators of world-class knowledge, advanced modern technologies, the use and transfer of which can ensure the modernization of the country and personal career growth of future specialists.
Objective
- Successful mastery of the types of speech activity in accordance with the level of training.
- Formation and improvement of language skills in various situations of everyday, socio-cultural, professional communication.
- Formation of oral and written speech production skills in accordance with the communicative purpose and professional sphere of communication.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- Make the right choice and use of linguistic and speech means to solve certain problems of communication and cognition based on knowledge of a sufficient amount of vocabulary, a system of grammatical knowledge; interpret text information, explain the stylistic and genre features of the specifics of sociocultural, socio-political texts, official business and professional sphere of communication.
- Carrying out the correct selection and use of linguistic and speech means to solve certain problems of communication and knowledge based on possession of a sufficient vocabulary, a system of grammatical knowledge; interpretation of text information, interpretation of stylistic and genre features of texts in the field of sociocultural, socio-political, official business and professional relations.
- Correctly select and use speech and language means to solve technical or other problems and knowledge of basic knowledge of a sufficient amount of vocabulary, all grammatical knowledge; interpret the information of the text, explain the style and genre of the specifics of the text in the socio-cultural, socio-political, official and professional spheres of advertising.
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- Build programs of speech behavior in situations of personal, social and professional communication in accordance with the norms of language, culture, and a specific sphere of communication; compose everyday, socio-cultural, official and business texts in accordance with general rules, accepted norms, functional orientation, use of lexical, grammatical and pragmatic material adequate for this purpose.
- To develop programs of the specified behavior in situations of personal, social and professional relations in accordance with the norms of language, culture, and a specific sphere of public activity. To compose beautiful, socio-cultural, official business texts in accordance with the above norms, functional correctness, and the use of an adequate set of lexical, grammatical, and grammatical goals.
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- Пікірталастарда этикалық, мәдени, әлеуметтік маңызды мәселелерді талқылау, өз көзқарасын білдіру, оны дәлелді түрде қорғау, әңгімелесушілердің пікірін сыни тұрғыдан бағалау; әртүрлі жағдайларда, қарым-қатынастың әртүрлі салаларында қарым - қатынасқа қатысу өз ниеттері мен қажеттіліктерін жүзеге асыру мақсатында олардың этикалық тұрғыдан дұрыс, мағыналы, лексикалық-грамматикалық және прагматикалық тұрғыдан барабар жағдайларын декларациялау.
- Unclear etiquette, cultural, socially significant problems in discussions, express one's point of view, argue argumentatively, critically evaluate the opinion of the interlocutor; participate in communications in various situations of different spheres of society with the full realization of one's own intentions and needs, ensuring their ethical correctness, coherence of completeness, lexico-grammatical and pragmatic situations.
- Discuss ethical, cultural, socially significant issues in debates, express your point of view, prove it, critically evaluate the opinions of interlocutors; participate in communication in various situations in various spheres of communication in order to realize your intentions and needs, declare them as ethically correct, meaningfully completed, adequate to the lexico-grammatical and pragmatic situation.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- Convey the actual content of texts, formulate their conceptual information, describe the derived knowledge of both the entire text and its individual structural elements; request and report information in accordance with the communication situation, evaluate the actions and actions of participants to use information as a tool to influence the interlocutor.
- Transmitting the actual content of texts, formulating their conceptual information, describing the final knowledge about the entire text and its individual structural elements; requesting and reporting information in accordance with the communication situation, evaluating the actions and deeds of participants, using information as a means of influencing the interlocutor.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- To compose everyday, socio-cultural, official and business texts in accordance with generally accepted norms, functional orientation, using lexical, grammatical and pragmatic material of a certain certification level that is adequate for the set goal.
Teaching methods
Communication technology.
Competence-based learning.
Role-playing games and educational discussions of various formats.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | Working with texts. Write questions to the text. | 0-100 |
A story about yourself and your family. | ||
Message on the topic "My friends. | ||
Reading and retelling the text. | ||
Рresentation "My hobbies". | ||
Writing a greeting card. | ||
Prepare a script for a holiday. | ||
Prepare a presentation about your native land. | ||
2 rating | Essay “My City” or an advertising story about your hometown for tourists. | 0-100 |
Prepare a presentation of the dream city and describe its features and attractions. | ||
Write a review about what you saw on the website of a theater or museum. | ||
Find their definitions in explanatory dictionaries, the meaning of new words. | ||
Prepare a case study on the topic: buying vegetables at the market, repairing a mobile phone, buying stationery, jewelry. | ||
Prepare a case study on the topic: buying vegetables at the market, repairing a mobile phone, buying stationery, jewelry. | ||
Create a set of clothes with a fashionable color combination and comment on the color symbolism. | ||
Total control | Abstract, Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
Small group work. | Demonstrate deep and complete knowledge and understanding of the entire volume of the studied material; fully understand the essence of the concepts, phenomena and patterns, theories, relationships under consideration; be able to build a complete and correct answer on the basis of the studied material; highlight the main provisions, independently support the answer with specific examples, facts; analyze, generalize conclusions independently proven; interdisciplinary and (on the basis. | From 70 to 89 points: knowledge of all the studied program material; a complete and correct answer based on the studied theories; minor errors and shortcomings in the reproduction of the studied material, definitions of concepts, inaccuracies in the use of scientific terms or in conclusions and generalizations; the material is presented in a certain logical sequence, but one non-rough error is allowed or not there are more than two shortcomings, and the student can correct them independently if required or with a little help from the teacher; he has mostly mastered the teaching material; confirms the answer with concrete examples. | From 50-69 points: there are significant deviations from the topic in the answer; the analysis of the problem provided by the question is fragmentary, incomplete; facts are not always separated from opinions, but the student understands the difference between them. | Demonstrate deep and complete knowledge and understanding of the entire volume of the studied material; fully understand the essence of the concepts, phenomena and patterns, theories, relationships under consideration; be able to build a complete and correct answer on the basis of the studied material; highlight the main provisions, independently support the answer with specific examples, facts; analyze, generalize conclusions independently proven; interdisciplinary and (on the basis. |
Submission of tasks for the student's independent work. | Demonstration of deep and complete knowledge and understanding of the entire volume of the studied material; full understanding of the essence of the concepts, phenomena and patterns, theories, relationships under consideration; the ability to make a complete and correct answer based on the studied material; highlight the main points, independently support the answer with concrete examples, facts; independently make reasoned analysis, generalize conclusions; the ability to establish interdisciplinary (based on previously acquired knowledge) and intra-subject relationships. | Knowledge of all the studied program material; a complete and correct answer based on the studied theories; minor errors and flaws in the reproduction of the studied material, definitions of concepts, inaccuracies in the use of scientific terms or in conclusions and generalizations; the material is presented in a certain logical sequence, but one blunt error or no more than two flaws is allowed, and the student he can correct them on his own if required or with a little help from a teacher; he has mostly mastered the educational material; confirms the answer with specific examples. | There are significant deviations from the topic in the answer; the analysis of the problem provided by the question is fragmentary, incomplete; facts are not always separated from opinions, but the student understands the difference between them. | Demonstration of deep and complete knowledge and understanding of the entire volume of the studied material; full understanding of the essence of the concepts, phenomena and patterns, theories, relationships under consideration; the ability to make a complete and correct answer based on the studied material; highlight the main points, independently support the answer with concrete examples, facts; independently make reasoned analysis, generalize conclusions; the ability to establish interdisciplinary (based on previously acquired knowledge) and intra-subject relationships. |
Preparation and protection of presentations. | The logical content is presented; the relevance of the topic under consideration is reflected, the main categories are correctly identified; in conclusion, detailed, independent conclusions are formulated. | The logical content is presented; the relevance of the topic is revealed; there are minor errors and shortcomings in the studied material; in conclusion, general conclusions are formulated. | The logical content is presented; the relevance of the topic is not fully disclosed; the theoretical analysis is given descriptively, the student did not reflect his own position in relation to the materials under consideration, a number of judgments are shallow; conclusions are not formulated. | The logical content is presented; the relevance of the topic under consideration is reflected, the main categories are correctly identified; in conclusion, detailed, independent conclusions are formulated. |
Passing the lexical minimum. | Correct definition of the meaning of lexical words, the presence of minor errors is not allowed. | No more than one significant mistake and several minor ones were made. | There have been several significant and/or one gross error in determining the meaning of a word. | Correct definition of the meaning of lexical words, the presence of minor errors is not allowed. |
Passing the grammatical minimum. | Fully expounds the studied material, gives correct definitions of linguistic concepts; discovers an understanding of the material, can justify his judgments, apply knowledge in practice, give necessary examples; presents the material consistently and correctly from the point of view of the norms of the literary language. | The student gives a satisfactory answer, but makes 1-2 mistakes, which he corrects himself and 1-2 flaws in the sequence and linguistic design of the material being presented. | The student discovers knowledge and understanding of the main provisions of this topic, but presents the material incompletely and admits inaccuracies in the definition of concepts or the formulation of rules; does not know how to substantiate his judgments in sufficient depth and evidence and give his examples; presents the material inconsistently and makes mistakes in the linguistic design of what is being presented. | Fully expounds the studied material, gives correct definitions of linguistic concepts; discovers an understanding of the material, can justify his judgments, apply knowledge in practice, give necessary examples; presents the material consistently and correctly from the point of view of the norms of the literary language. |
Frontier control. | It is put for work done without errors and defects, at least 100% of the tasks must be completed. | It is put to work if there is no more than one blunt error and one flaw in it, no more than three flaws. Between 70 and 89% of the tasks must be completed. | It is put if the student has correctly completed at least 50% of the entire work or has made no more than one gross error and two defects, no more than one gross and one blunt error, no more than three blunt errors, one blunt error and three defects, if there are four or five defects. | It is put for work done without errors and defects, at least 100% of the tasks must be completed. |
A written exam. | The content of the written work fully meets the requirements; there are no factual errors; the content is presented consistently; the work is distinguished by the richness of the dictionary, the accuracy of word usage. In general, 1 defect in the content and 1-2 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: -1 spelling, or -1 punctuation, or -1 grammatical error. | The content of the work mostly corresponds to the topic (there are minor deviations from the topic); the content is mostly reliable, but there are isolated factual inaccuracies; there are minor violations of consistency in the presentation of thoughts. In general, no more than 2 defects in content and no more than 3-4 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: 2 spelling and 2 punctuation errors, or -1 spelling and 3 punctuation errors, or -4 punctuation errors in the absence of spelling errors, as well as 2 grammatical errors. | There are significant deviations from the question in the work; the work is reliable in the main, but there are some factual inaccuracies; incorrect usage occurs. In general, no more than 4 defects in content and 5 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: 4 spelling and 4 punctuation errors, or 3 spelling errors and 5 punctuation errors, or 7 punctuation errors in the absence of spelling errors. | The content of the written work fully meets the requirements; there are no factual errors; the content is presented consistently; the work is distinguished by the richness of the dictionary, the accuracy of word usage. In general, 1 defect in the content and 1-2 speech defects are allowed in the work. Allowed: -1 spelling, or -1 punctuation, or -1 grammatical error. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of practical classes
- Acquaintance
- My friends
- Schedule
- Free time
- Family holidays
- Public holidays in Kazakhstan
- Small Motherland (place where I was born)
- The city where I study
- My dream city
- Cultural life of the city: in the theater, in the museum, at the concert
- Language of specialty and professional culture of speech
- There is no bad weather
- How to shop
- Modern style of clothing
- Intermediate control
Key reading
- Nikitina S.A. Russian language 11th grade. In 2 parts Part 2. 2020.
- Sabitova Z. K. Russkij yazyk 10 kl.: Uchebnik dlya 10 klassov obshchestvenno-gumanitarnogo napravleniya. 2019.
- Belous, B. S. It's interesting to hear (listening): textbook / B. S. Belous. — St. Petersburg: Publishing House of A. I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 2023. — 161 p. — ISBN 978-5-8064-3377-1. — Text: electronic // Digital educational resource IPR SMART: [website]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/137236.html (date of application: 04/22/2024). — Access mode: for authorized users
- Kornev, V. A. The Russian language in the speech aspect: a textbook for foreign students / V. A. Kornev, L. S. Katelina, O. M. Dedova. — Moscow: AI Pi Ar Media, 2021. — 412 p. — ISBN 978-5-4497-1324-7. — Text: electronic // Digital educational resource IPR SMART: [website]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/110123.html (date of application: 04/22/2024). — Access mode: for authorized users. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.23682/110123
- Yadrikhinskaya, E. A. Collection of exercises in Russian grammar: a textbook / E. A. Yadrikhinskaya. — Voronezh: Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2023. — 96 p. — ISBN 978-5-00032-618-3. — Text: electronic // Digital educational resource IPR SMART: [website]. — URL:https://www.iprbookshop.ru/132745.html (date of application: 04/22/2024). — Access mode: for authorized users
- Surova D. S. Nauchnyj stil' rechi: ucheb. posobie / D. S. Surova; Ministerstvo obra-zovaniya i nauki Respubliki Kazahstan, Vostochno-Kazahstanskij gosudarstvennyj tekhnicheskij universitet im. D. Serikbaeva (Ust'-Kamenogorsk). - Ust'-Kamenogorsk: VKGTU, 2019. - 130 s.
Further reading
- Russian language and literature. In 2 parts [Text] : textbook for the 11th grade of a secondary school with a non-Russian language of instruction. - Almaty : Atamura, 2020.
- Russian language and literature. 11 cl. [Text] : a textbook for the 11th cl. of a secondary school with a non-Russian language of instruction / comp. U. A. Zhanpeis. - Almaty : Atamura, 2020. - 288 p. - ISBN 978-601-331-716-8 : 1675 t
- IPR SMART http://www.iprbookshop.ru
- ScienceDirect - http://www.sciencedirect.com.
- Pakhomova, S. I. Collection of control papers and grammar tests for foreign students of the Faculty of Economics. In 2 parts. Part I: textbook / S. I. Pakhomova, M. N. Pashkova, A. Y. Tiraspol; edited by S. I. Pakhomova, A. Y. Tiraspol. — Moscow: AI Pi Ar Media, 2023. — 63 p. — ISBN 978-5-4497-1783-2 (part I), 978-5-4497-1782-5. — Text: electronic // Digital educational resource IPR SMART: [website]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/125766.html