Metallurgy of Lead, Zinc, Cadmium
Description: Ознакомление с сырьевой базой свинца, цинка и кадмия и технологическими схемами переработки их руд и концентратов, изучение основных термодинамических и кинетических закономерностей пирометаллургических и гидрометаллургических процессов, протекающих в металлургических агрегатах при получении свинца, цинка и кадмия; изучение способов и технологий переработки промежуточных продуктов производства с целью извлечения из них ценных компонентов; устройство и принцип работы основного технологического оборудования.
Amount of credits: 8
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | 30 |
Practical works | |
Laboratory works | 45 |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 45 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 120 |
Form of final control | Exam |
Final assessment method |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
Objective
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
Teaching methods
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | 0-100 | |
2 rating | 0-100 | |
Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |