Geodesy
Description: The students acquire skills and abilities to perform a complex of geodetic work required in the design, construction and operation of engineering structures using modern geodetic equipment (topographic surveys for the preparation of topographic maps and plans, the creation of planned and high-altitude surveying base, mathematical processing of geodetic measurements, solving problems on topographic maps and plans).
Amount of credits: 5
Пререквизиты:
- География. Школьный курс
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | 15 |
| Practical works | |
| Laboratory works | 30 |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | Written exam |
Component: University component
Cycle: Base disciplines
Goal
- Give an idea of the shape and size of the Earth, coordinate systems, making measurements on the ground, processing the obtained measurement results and drawing up a topographic plan, cross-section drawings
Objective
- The student must know the composition and technology of geodetic works that ensure the design and construction of various engineering facilities (buildings, highways, hydraulic structures, bridges, pipelines); the technology of certain types of geodetic works for various land cadastral activities; methods of geodetic measurements and executive surveys, methods of mapping land resources.
- Студент должен уметь: - свободно читать топографическую карту и решать на её основе задачи графического и расчётного характера; - самостоятельно выполнять несложные геодезические измерения и работы, связанные с решением типовых проектных и строительных задач, с помощью геодезических приборов и инструментов; - производить математическую обработку измерений (вычисление ведомости координат, ведомости прямых и кривых, обработку журнала тахеометрической съёмки, журнала технического нивелирования); - графически оформлять результаты измерений (построение топографического плана, продольного и поперечного профилей, планов горизонтальной и вертикальной планировки с картограммой земляных работ).
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- - specifics of topographic, geodetic and cartographic work; - geodetic instruments and instruments used for geodetic measurements, mathematical processing of their results, as well as methods for creating topographic maps (plans).
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- The ability to apply modern methods and methods of geodetic works in geodetic support of economic facilities using modern technologies and software.
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- The ability to analyze information, make informed judgments and draw informed conclusions about the methods of production of various geodetic measurements and the conditions of their application.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- - to work effectively individually and as a team member with the division of responsibility and authority in solving complex tasks; - to perform organizational and managerial functions in the team.
- ability to perform organizational and managerial functions in the collective.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- Skills in working with geodetic instruments and instruments.
- The ability to compile geodetic technical documentation.
Teaching methods
- interactive lecture (the use of the following active forms of learning: guided discussion or conversation; moderation; demonstration of slides or educational films; brainstorming; motivational speech);
- creation of scenarios for the development of various situations based on the specified conditions;
- information and communication (for example, classes in a computer classroom using professional application software packages);
- search and research (independent research activities of students in the learning process);
- solving educational tasks.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Laboratory work | 0-100 |
| Independent work of the student | ||
| Midterm Control 1 | ||
| 2 rating | Laboratory work | 0-100 |
| Independent work of the student | ||
| Midterm Control 1 | ||
| Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Midterm control and examination | demonstrates systemic theoretical knowledge, knows terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions | demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge, knows terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes insignificant mistakes that he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher | demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, shows poorly formed skills in analyzing phenomena and processes, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, shows insufficient fluency in monologue speech, terminology, logic and consistency of presentation, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by a teacher. | demonstrates systemic theoretical knowledge, knows terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions |
| Laboratory work | completed the practical work in full with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, drawings, drawings, graphs, calculations; correctly performs error analysis. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, is able to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines. | I fulfilled the requirements for the "5" rating, but 2-3 deficiencies were allowed. The student's answer to the questions meets the basic requirements for answering 5, but is given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using links with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other disciplines; one mistake or no more than two shortcomings are made, the student can correct them independently or with a little help from a teacher | The student did not complete the work completely, but at least 50% of the volume of practical work, which allows to obtain correct results and conclusions; mistakes were made during the work. When answering questions, the student correctly understands the essence of the question, but in the answer there are separate problems in the assimilation of the course questions that do not prevent further assimilation of the program material; no more than one gross error and two shortcomings were made. | completed the practical work in full with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, drawings, drawings, graphs, calculations; correctly performs error analysis. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, is able to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines. |
| Independent work of the student | Independent work fully corresponds to the given throne. The work is fully completed and the structure answers all the necessary questions. Decorated in accordance with the accepted official methodologies. The accounting and graphic department is designed in accordance with the standards. During the transfer, the student will fully state the topic and answer additional questions without delay | The work is fully executed, according to the throne. The work meets all the requirements of design and design. One or two errors are allowed. The student will be able to defend the work performed, understand the essence and purpose of the work, and may not immediately answer only additional questions | The student did not complete the work in full, but the general direction and essence corresponded to the assigned task. There are gaps in the design and rough errors. Can not answer additional questions | Independent work fully corresponds to the given throne. The work is fully completed and the structure answers all the necessary questions. Decorated in accordance with the accepted official methodologies. The accounting and graphic department is designed in accordance with the standards. During the transfer, the student will fully state the topic and answer additional questions without delay |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Introductory lecture
- Coordinate systems in Geodesy
- Topographic maps and planes
- Local-orientation of the straight lines on the ground
- Terrain
- Geodetic measurements and errors
- Theodolites
- Theodolite moves
- Tacheometric survey
- Leveling
- Leveling
- Leveling the terrain
- Design of flat areas
- Geodetic grids
- Geodetic division works
Key reading
- Бектанов, Б. К. Жер кадастрлық геодезиялық жұмыстар : оқулық / Б. К. Бектанов. — Алматы : Нур-Принт, 2015. — 167 c. — ISBN 978-601-241-563-6. — Текст : электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART : [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/67047.html (дата обращения: 29.09.2023). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей
- Попов, Б. А. Основы геодезии : практикум / Б. А. Попов, И. В. Нестеренко. — Воронеж : Воронежский государственный архитектурно-строительный университет, ЭБС АСВ, 2016. — 88 c. — ISBN 978-5-89040-617-0. — Текст : электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART : [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/72927.html (дата обращения: 29.09.2023). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей
- Флаксман, А. А. Геодезия и кадастр : учебно-методическое пособие / А. А. Флаксман. — Нижний Новгород : Нижегородский государственный архитектурно-строительный университет, ЭБС АСВ, 2017. — 51 c. — ISBN 978-5-528-00203-3. — Текст : электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART : [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/80888.html (дата обращения: 29.09.2023). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей
- Перфильев, А. А. Топография (геодезия) : учебное пособие для бакалавров / А. А. Перфильев, М. А. Бучельников, А. С. Тушина. — Саратов : Вузовское образование, 2019. — 134 c. — ISBN 978-5-4487-0505-2. — Текст : электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART : [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/83663.html (дата обращения: 29.09.2023). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей
- Левитская, Т. И. Основы геодезии : учебное пособие / Т. И. Левитская ; под редакцией Э. Д. Кузнецова. — 2-е изд. — Екатеринбург : Издательство Уральского университета, 2017. — 88 c. — ISBN 978-5-7996-2199-5. — Текст : электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART : [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/106435.html (дата обращения: 29.09.2023). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей
Further reading
- Юнусов А.Г., Беликов А.Б., Баранов В.Н., Каширкин Ю.Ю. Геодезия. – М.: Академический Проект; Гаудеамус, 2011
- Геодезия. Расчетно-графическая работа № 1 «Топографическая карта» : методические указания / составители М. М. Орехов [и др.]. — Санкт-Петербург : Санкт-Петербургский государственный архитектурно-строительный университет, ЭБС АСВ, 2016. — 24 c. — Текст : электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART : [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/74325.html (дата обращения: 29.09.2023). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей
- Букша, У. А. Геодезия : лабораторный практикум / У. А. Букша, В. В. Букша. — Екатеринбург : Издательство Уральского университета, 2018. — 76 c. — ISBN 978-5-7996-2319-7. — Текст : электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART : [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/106355.html (дата обращения: 29.09.2023). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей
