System Analysis
Description: System analysis is a scientific method of knowledge, which is a sequence of actions to establish structural relationships between variables or permanent elements of the system. The course examines the subject of systems theory and systems analysis, principles and structure of systems analysis, elements and methods of systems analysis, methods of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of systems, systems analysis and decision-making problems.
Amount of credits: 5
Пререквизиты:
- Information and Communication Technologies (in english)
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | 30 |
Practical works | 15 |
Laboratory works | |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
Form of final control | Exam |
Final assessment method | Written exam |
Component: University component
Cycle: Base disciplines
Goal
- Preparing the graduate for analytical activities in research and design of information systems in industries
Objective
- Acquisition of theoretical knowledge on the systems approach to the study of systems and practical skills in their modeling
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- the methodological basis of modern thermal technologies used in the process of engineering/reengineering of thermal energy systems, processes and plants and their study by methods of system analysis
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- use mathematical methods of processing, analysis and synthesis of the results of scientific and professional research in the application of systems analysis methodology
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- skills of carrying out system analysis by means of computer hardware and software
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- work in a team when implementing projects, including international ones
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- Be able to formulate competitive ideas and innovative tasks, apply non-standard methods for their implementation
Teaching methods
Technology of educational and research activities
Communication techniques (discussions, press conferences, brainstorming, academic debates, etc.)
Information and communication (including remote) technologies
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | Practical work1 | 0-100 |
Practical work2 | ||
Practical work3 | ||
Working with the MOOC course | ||
2 rating | Practical work4 | 0-100 |
Practical work5 | ||
Practical work6 | ||
Practical work7 | ||
Working with the MOOC course | ||
Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
The policy for assessing student achievements is based on the principles of academic integrity, unity of requirements, objectivity and fairness, openness and transparency. The discipline involves completing tasks of 2 rating controls (weeks 8 and 15) and passing an exam. Depending on the quality of assimilation of theoretical knowledge, a score is given from 0 to 100%. | The student demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, knows the terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates the ability to quickly answer clarifying questions. Practical tasks are performed in full, within the specified time limits, there are no comments on the quality of practical work. | The student demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge, knows the terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, but at the same time makes minor mistakes, which are quickly corrected independently or with a little help from the teacher. Practical work is completed on time, but when checking the work there are comments on the quality or correctness of the task. | The student demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, shows poorly developed skills of analyzing phenomena and processes, insufficient ability to make reasoned conclusions and give examples, is not fluent enough in terminology, logic and sequence of presentation, makes mistakes that can be corrected only through correction by the teacher. Fulfillment of practical tasks is difficult, there are serious remarks to the quality of work. | The student demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, knows the terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates the ability to quickly answer clarifying questions. Practical tasks are performed in full, within the specified time limits, there are no comments on the quality of practical work. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- The subject of systems theory and systems analysis
- Principles and Structure of Systems Analysis
- Elements and methods of systems analysis
- Methods of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of systems
- Elements of decision-making theory
- Decision-making under conditions of risk
- Decision making under certainty and uncertainty
- Application of artificial intelligence technologies in the heat and power industry
- Using AI in solving forecasting and optimization problems
Key reading
- Antonov A.V. Sistemnyj analiz. Uchebnik dlya vuzov/ A.V.Antonov. – M.: Vyssh.shk., 2004. – 454 s.: il.
- Anfilatov V.S. i dr. Sistemnyj analiz v upravlenii: Ucheb. posobie/ V.S.Anfilatov, A.A.Emel'yanov, A.A.Kukushkin; pod red. A.A.Emel'yanova. – M.: Finansy i statistika, 2006. – 368 s.: il.
- Denisov A.A. Sovremennye problemy sistemnogo analiza: Informacionnye osnovy: Ucheb. posobie. – SPb.: Izd-vo Politekh.un-ta, 2005. – 295 s.
- Sistemnyj analiz i prinyatie reshenij: Slovar'-spravochnik: Ucheb.posobie dlya vuzov/ Pod red. V.N.Volkovoj, V.N.Kozlova, - M.: Vyssh.shk., 2004. – 616 s.: il.
- Spicnadel' V.N. Osnovy sistemnogo analiza: Ucheb.posobie. – SPB.: Izd-vo Biznes-pressa, 2010. – 326 s.
Further reading
- Homyakov P.M. Sistemnyj analiz: Kratkij kurs/ Pod red. V.P.Prohorova. Izd. 2-e, stereotipnoe. – M.: KomKniga, 2007. – 216 s.
- Kachala V.V. Osnovy teorii sistem i sistemnogo analiza. Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. – M.: Goryachaya liniya-Telekom, 2007. – 216 s.: il.
- Popov V.N. i dr. Sistemnyj analiz v menedzhmente: uchebnoe posobie/ V.N.Popov, V.S.Kas'yanov, I.P.Savchenko; pod red. d-ra ekon.nauk, prof. V.N.Popova. - M.– KNORUS, 2007. – 304 s.
- CHernysheva L.A., Belyakova N.V. Sistemnyj analiz v servise. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po vypolneniyu kontrol'noj raboty dlya studentov special'nosti 060800 «Ekonomika i upravlenie na predpriyatii v sfere servisa». – SPb,: Izd-vo SPbGASE, 2005. – 35 s.
- SHisterov I.M. Sistemnyj analiz: Uchebnoe posobie. – SPb,: SPbGIEA, 2000. – 95 s.