HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Information Technologies in Power Engineering

Blinaeva Elena Vasilyevna

Description: The discipline "Information Technologies in Power Engineering" considers modern traditions of application of information technologies to solve problems of organization of the process of distance education; introduces forms and methods of accumulation of scientific information; considers structure and means of network systems of distance education.

Amount of credits: 5

Пререквизиты:

Information and Communication Technologies (in english)

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures	30
Practical works
Laboratory works	15
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	Written exam

Component: University component

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal

developing future specialists' knowledge of computer-based educational technologies

Objective

Acquisition of theoretical knowledge and practical skills to create a CDS

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

modern information technologies used in the educational process of engineering/reengineering of electric power systems, processes and installations

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

be able to develop and use technical solutions used in the process of engineering/reengineering of electric power systems, processes and installations

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

Have skills in designing and implementing technical projects in the field of knowledge transfer to specialists in the thermal power industry

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

work in a team when implementing projects, including international ones

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

be able to formulate competitive ideas and innovative tasks when developing training content for thermal power industry specialists

Teaching methods

Technology of educational and research activities

Communication techniques (discussions, press conferences, brainstorming, academic debates, etc.)

Information and communication (including remote) technologies

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Laboratory work1	0-100
	Test1
	Laboratory work2
	Test2
	Laboratory work3
2 rating	Laboratory work4	0-100
	Test3
	Laboratory work5
	Test4
Total control	Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
The policy for assessing student achievements is based on the principles of academic integrity, unity of requirements, objectivity and fairness, openness and transparency. The discipline involves completing tasks of 2 rating controls (weeks 8 and 15) and passing an exam. Depending on the quality of assimilation of theoretical knowledge, a score is given from 0 to 100%.	The student demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, knows the terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates the ability to quickly answer clarifying questions. Practical tasks are performed in full, within the specified time limits, there are no comments on the quality of practical work.	The student demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge, knows the terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, but at the same time makes minor mistakes, which are quickly corrected independently or with a little help from the teacher. Practical work is completed on time, but when checking the work there are comments on the quality or correctness of the task.	The student demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, shows poorly developed skills of analyzing phenomena and processes, insufficient ability to make reasoned conclusions and give examples, is not fluent enough in terminology, logic and sequence of presentation, makes mistakes that can be corrected only through correction by the teacher. Fulfillment of practical tasks is difficult, there are serious remarks to the quality of work.	The student demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, knows the terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates the ability to quickly answer clarifying questions. Practical tasks are performed in full, within the specified time limits, there are no comments on the quality of practical work.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of lectures

Databases of scientific and educational information
Information retrieval methods
Telecommunication networks
Learning Management System
Computer-based educational technologies
Distance learning
Structure and tools of networked distance learning systems

Key reading

Пидкасистый П.И. Тыщенко О.Б. Компьютерные технологии в системе дистанционного обучения // Педагогика. -2000. -№5. -С. 7-12.
Шахмаев Н.М. Технические средства дистанционного обучения. М. – «Знание», 2000. – 276 с.
Agaponov S. "Sredstva distancionnogo obucheniya. Metodika, tekhnologiya, instrumentarij". Izdatel'stvo: BHV, 2003 g., 336 s.
Tolstobokov O.N. "Sovremennye metody i tekhnologii distancionnogo obucheniya". Monografiya – M.: Mir nauki, 2020.
Metodicheskaya sistema distancionnogo obucheniya predmetu: struktura, funkcii i harakteristika komponentov. Smykovskaya T. K., 25.04.2006. Internet zhurnal SahGU «Nauka, obrazovanie, obshchestvo». URL stat'i: http://journal.sakhgu.ru/work.php?id=35
Ahayan A.A. Virtual'nyj pedagogicheskij vuz. Teoriya stanovleniya. - SPb.: Izd-vo "Korifej", 2001. - 170 s.

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan