Technical Support for Energy-Saving Mining Technologies
Description: The discipline is aimed at studying modern technical solutions and equipment that can increase energy efficiency in the mining industry. Undergraduates study in depth the principles of modern energy-saving technologies, analyze their effectiveness and impact on the environment. The course includes the study of innovative approaches to reducing energy consumption, the analysis of mineral processing technologies taking into account energy-saving methods, as well as the development and implementation of sustainable practices in the mining sector. The main goal of the discipline is to train qualified specialists who can improve the efficiency and sustainability of mining enterprises, taking into account modern requirements for energy conservation and environmental safety..
Amount of credits: 6
Пререквизиты:
- Mining Technology
Course Workload:
Types of classes | hours |
---|---|
Lectures | 30 |
Practical works | 30 |
Laboratory works | |
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
SAW (Student autonomous work) | 90 |
Form of final control | Exam |
Final assessment method | Oral examination |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- The goal is to form a system of scientific and professional knowledge and skills in undergraduates in the field of technical means that provide energy-saving technologies for mining.
Objective
- The task is to get acquainted with modern trends in the technical support of technological processes in mining.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- The student must know the structure of the main units, assemblies and systems of technical means used in the mining cluster.
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- Application of acquired knowledge and skills in practice and in the study of other disciplines.
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- The ability to form judgments about the structure and characteristics of the technical means of mining.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- Ability to solve problems in cooperation with other team members.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- Obtaining skills in the study of similar disciplines.
Teaching methods
- Lecture-seminar-testing system; training in cooperation (team, group work); information and communication technologies; project-based learning technology; research method of teaching.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
Period | Type of task | Total |
---|---|---|
1 rating | Study of the device of drilling equipment. | 0-100 |
Calculation of operational parameters of machines. | ||
2 rating | Selection of technological equipment parameters. | 0-100 |
The scope of application of technological equipment. | ||
Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Topic 1
- Topic 2
- Topic 3
- Topic 4
- Topic 5
- Topic 6
- Topic 7
- Topic 8
- Topic 9
- Topic 10
- Topic 11
- Topic 12
- Topic 13
- Topic 14
- Тема 15
Key reading
- 1. Подэрни Р.Ю.Горные машины и комплексы для открытых работ: Учебное пособие. В 2 т. Т.1. - 4-е изд., стер.- М.:Издательство Московского государственного горного университета, 2001.-422 с. 2. Подэрни Р.Ю.Горные машины и комплексы для открытых работ: Учебное пособие. В 2 т. Т.2. - 4-е изд., стер.- М.:Издательство Московского государственного горного университета, 2001.-332 с. 3. Современные винтовые забойные двигатели для бурения нефтяных и газовых скважин: Учебное пособие/ авторы-сост.: М.В. Двойников, А.А.Байбулатов, К.И.Борисов, А.В. Епихин. - Изд-во Томского политехнического университета, 2014.-76 с.
Further reading
- 4. Машины и оборудование для шахт и рудников: Справочник/ С.Х. Клорикьян, В.В. Старичнев, М.А. Сребный и др. – 6 –е изд. Стереотип. – М.: Издательство Московского государственного горного университета, 2000. – 471 с. 5. Научно-техническое обеспечение горного производства: Труды ДГП "Института горного дела им. Д.А.Кунаева", том 65. Под общей редакцией д.т.н., проф. С.Ж. Галиева.- Алматы, 2003. - 364 с.