Дисциплина

HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Modern Design Systems and Additive Technologies in Architecture

Inozemtseva Tatiana Alexandrovna

Description: The student becomes familiar with modern structural building systems and additive technologies used in construction. Learn the basic principles of the design of these systems, including in earthquake-prone areas. Studying in laboratory conditions the principle of the construction of buildings and structures using additive technology.

Amount of credits: 5

Пререквизиты:

Architectural Constructions

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures	30
Practical works	15
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	Oral exam

Component: Component by selection

Cycle: Base disciplines

Goal

The purpose of the discipline is to provide students with objective knowledge of modern structural systems of buildings used in earthquake-prone areas and the use of new (additive) technologies in the field of construction

Objective

To study the new (parametric) system of technical regulation in the field of construction in the Republic of Kazakhstan
To study the principle of design of buildings and structures according to Eurocodes
To study the requirements for buildings in earthquake-prone areas
To get acquainted with modern technologies used in construction
Gaining practical skills in additive printing of small architectural forms

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

Have in-depth knowledge of the discipline, contributing to the formation of a highly educated person with a broad outlook and culture of thinking.
Know modern structural systems used in construction and understand the possibility of their use in earthquake-prone areas

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

Have the skills to acquire the new knowledge necessary for daily professional activity and further training

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

Know how to provide the results of the work done in the form of reports, abstracts, articles designed in accordance with the requirements, with the involvement of modern editing and printing tools.

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

Be able to work in a team, solve production problems; take responsibility for solving production problems.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

Have an idea of the latest discoveries in the field of materials science and perspectives of their use for additive technologies in the field of construction.

Teaching methods

Traditional technologies are provided for teaching the discipline: classroom and independent work of students. Lecture course is presented in multimedia form. When presenting lecture material at the beginning and at the end of the lecture motivational speech is used. Text, audio and video information, graphs, tables etc. are used in the lecture-presentation. Practical classes are held in a laboratory equipped with a construction printer and construction materials for additive printing

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Testing on the theoretical course	0-100
	Performing practical assignments (1-4)
	Colloquium
	Colloquium
2 rating	Практикалық тапсырмаларды орындау	0-100
	Performing practical assignments (5-6)
	Performing practical assignments (7-10)
	Oral questioning
Total control	Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Exam	The theoretical content of the course has been fully mastered, without gaps, the necessary practical skills of working with the mastered material have been formed, all the training tasks provided for in the training program have been completed, the quality of their performance is estimated by the number of points close to the maximum.	The theoretical content of the course has been fully mastered, without gaps, some practical skills of working with the mastered material have not been sufficiently formed, all the training tasks provided for in the training program have been completed, the quality of none of them has been evaluated with a minimum number of points, some types of tasks have been completed with errors.	The theoretical content of the course has been partially mastered, but the gaps are not significant, the necessary practical skills for working with the mastered material have been mainly formed, most of the training tasks provided for in the training program have been completed, some of the completed tasks may contain errors	The theoretical content of the course has been fully mastered, without gaps, the necessary practical skills of working with the mastered material have been formed, all the training tasks provided for in the training program have been completed, the quality of their performance is estimated by the number of points close to the maximum.
Theoretical course testing	The correct answer to 90-100% of the test questions.	The correct answer to 70-89% of the test questions.	The correct answer to 50-69% of the test questions.	The correct answer to 90-100% of the test questions.
Presentation and public protection	Completed the practical work in full with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, drawings, drawings, graphs, calculations; correctly performs error analysis. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines.	I fulfilled the requirements for the assessment "excellent", but 2-3 shortcomings were made. The student's answer to the questions meets the basic requirements for answering 5, but is given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using links with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other disciplines; one mistake or no more than two shortcomings are made, the student can correct them independently or with a little help from a teacher.	I did not complete the work completely, but at least 50% of the volume of practical work, which allows me to get the right results and conclusions; mistakes were made during the work. When answering questions, the student correctly understands the essence of the question, but in the answer there are separate problems in the assimilation of the course questions that do not prevent further assimilation of the program material; no more than one gross error and two shortcomings were made.	Completed the practical work in full with the necessary sequence of actions; in response, correctly and accurately performs all records, tables, drawings, drawings, graphs, calculations; correctly performs error analysis. When answering questions, he correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines.
Oral interview	When answering, he follows the sequence and clearly sets out the material, focusing on the most important questions.	When answering, he follows the sequence and clearly sets out the material, but without focusing on the most important questions	When answering, sometimes the sequence is lost and clearly sets out the material, without focusing on the most important questions.	When answering, he follows the sequence and clearly sets out the material, focusing on the most important questions.
Colloquium	Demonstrates an understanding of the essence of the work performed, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; bases the answer on the studied material; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines.	Demonstrates an understanding of the essence of the work performed, there are minor inaccuracies in the definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; the answer is based on the studied material; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines.	Demonstrates an understanding of the essence of the work performed, but there are inaccuracies in the definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; the answer is based on the studied material; but cannot establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines.	Demonstrates an understanding of the essence of the work performed, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the basic concepts; bases the answer on the studied material; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material, as well as with the material learned in the study of other disciplines.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of lectures

Transition to a new system of technical regulation in Kazakhstan
Principle of design of buildings and structures according to Eurocodes
Volumetric-block structural systems
Requirements for volumetric block buildings in seismic areas
Wall reinforced concrete monolithic structural systems
Requirements for monolithic reinforced concrete buildings in seismic areas
The use of profiled decking as a permanent formwork for monolithic slabs
Structural systems of buildings made of thin-walled metal structures
Requirements for buildings made of thin-walled metal structures in seismic areas
Principles of building with additive technology
Materials used in the construction of buildings using additive technology

Key reading

1. Antonova V.S., Osovskaya I.I. Additivnye tekhnologii: uchebnoe posobie / VShTE SPbGUPTD. SPb., 2017.-30 s. 2. Zlenko A.E., Popovich A.A., Mutylina I.N. Additivnye tekhnologii v mashinostroenii: uchebnoe posobie / SPbGPTU. SPb., 2013. - 210 s. 3. Additivnye tekhnologii: istoriya i sovremennye realii [Elektronnyi resurs]/ Rezhim dostupa: http://simulabs.ru/news/view/article/additivnye-tekhnologii-istorija [Elektronnyi resurs].- Data obrashcheniya: 16.09.2019. 4. Baksanova Yu.A., Maksimov P.V. Obzor metodov additivnogo formirovaniya izdelii // PNIPU. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatelskii zhurnal, № 9 (51), Chast 2. / E 5. Campbell T., C. Williams, O. Ivanova. Could 3D printing change the world. Technologies, Potential, andImplications of Additive Manufacturing, Atlantic Council, Washington, DC. 2011. 6. Kobryn P. A., Semiatin S. L. The laser additive manufacture of Ti-6Al-4V. JOM. 2001. T. 53. No. 9. Pp. 40-42. 7. Brennan-Craddock J. et al. The design of impact absorbing structures for additive manufacture. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2012. T. 382. No. 1. 8. Klammert U. et al. Cytocompatibility of brushite and monetite cell culture scaffolds made by three-dimensional powder printing. Acta Biomaterialia. 2009. T. 5. No. 2. Pp. 727-734. 9. Lim S. et al. Fabricating construction components using layered manufacturing technology. Global Innovation in Construction Conference. 2009. Pp. 512-520. 10. Horbach S. et al. Building blocks for adaptable factory systems. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2011. T. 27. No. 4. Pp. 735-740. 11. Müller E. Building Blocks as an Approach for the Planning of Adaptable Production Systems. Advanced Manufacturing and Sustainable Logistics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. Pp. 37-45. 12. Gibson I., Rosen D, Stucker B. Additive manufacturing technologies. New York: Springer, 2010. T.238. 13. Johnston, W. D. Design and Construction of Concrete Formwork. E. G. Nawy (ed.), Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook. CRC Press, 2008. 7-1–7-49. 14. Lloret E. et al. Complex concrete structures: Merging existing casting techniques with digital fabrication. Computer-Aided Design. 2015. No.60. Pp. 40-49. 15. Khoshnevis B. et al. Mega-scale fabrication by contour crafting. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering. 2006. T.1. No.3. Pp.301-320. 16. N. Ramachandran, A. Gale. Space colonization. Aerospace America. 2008. T. 46, No.12, C. 77. 17. Pegna, J. Construction automation: Are we solving the wrong problem. RPI/RDRC Technical Report 92010. 1992 18. Pegna J. Exploratory investigation of solid freeform construction. Automation in construction. 1997. T. 5. No. 5. Pp. 427-437. 19. Khoshnevis B., Dutton R. Innovative rapid prototyping process makes large sized, smooth surfaced complex shapes in a wide variety of materials. Materials Technology. 1998. T.13. No.2. Pp.53-56. 20. Khoshnevis B. Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Automation in construction. 2004. T. 13. No. 1. Pp. 5-19. 21. Hwang D., Khoshnevis B. Concrete wall fabrication by contour crafting. 21st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2004), Jeju, South Korea. 2004. 22. Perkins I., Skitmore M. Three-dimensional printing in the construction industry: A review. International Journal of Construction Management. 2015. T.15. No.1. Pp. 1-9. 23. Gardiner J. Exploring the emerging design territory of construction 3D printing-project led architectural research. 2011. 382c. 24. Tay Y. W. et a26l. Processing and Properties of Construction Materials for 3D Printing. Materials Science Forum. – 2016. – T. 861. Pp. 177-181. 25.Lim S. et al. Development of a viable concrete printing process. 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. 2011. Pp. 665-670. 26. Buswell R. A. et al. Design, data and process issues for mega-scale rapid manufacturing machines used for construction. Automation in Co

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan