HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Modern methods of design of transport construction facilities

Pshembaev Mereke Kudaybergenovich

Description: The discipline examines issues and provides information on modern forms and methods of state regulation of the automotive industry, and considers innovative ways of organisational and technological support for the construction of transport infrastructure facilities.

Amount of credits: 6

Пререквизиты:

Motor roads of General network

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures	30
Practical works	30
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	90
Form of final control	Exam
Final assessment method	exam

Component: University component

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal

The purpose of the discipline is to provide, in accordance with the qualification characteristics of the master's student in EP 7M07300 “Monitoring and Diagnostics of Highways,” the knowledge and skills necessary for the successful performance in the future of relevant functional responsibilities in all positions and in all departments related to the field of activity of a builder of transport infrastructure facilities.

Objective

The main objectives when studying the discipline are:  studying the theoretical foundations of transport infrastructure objects;  formation of a system of concepts and ideas of transport infrastructure objects among students;  mastering the methods and technologies of modern construction processes of transport infrastructure facilities;  ability to resolve quality issues during the construction of transport infrastructure facilities;  developing skills to apply knowledge in practice of innovative ways of organizational and technological support for the construction of transport infrastructure facilities and modern methods of road construction.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

The ability to use the basic laws of natural sciences, methods of mathematical analysis and modeling, the fundamentals of theoretical and experimental research in complex engineering activities for the purpose of designing objects and technological processes in construction, using standard packages and computer-aided design tools.

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

The ability to independently apply methods and means of cognition, training and self-control, to realize the prospects of intellectual, cultural, moral, physical and professional self-development and self-improvement, to be able to critically evaluate one’s strengths and weaknesses.

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

Demonstrate knowledge of technical, legal, social, environmental and cultural aspects of integrated engineering activities, awareness of health, safety and occupational safety issues.

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

Ability to work effectively individually and as a team member, demonstrating leadership skills in individual groups of performers, including on interdisciplinary projects, to be able to demonstrate personal responsibility, commitment to professional ethics and standards of professional conduct.

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

Carry out communications in a professional environment and in society as a whole, including in a foreign language; analyze existing and independently develop technical documentation; clearly state and defend the results of complex engineering activities at enterprises of the construction and installation complex and in industry scientific organizations.

Teaching methods

When conducting training sessions, the use of the following educational technologies is provided: - Traditional technologies are provided for teaching: classroom lessons and independent work of students. The lecture course is presented in multimedia form. When presenting lecture material, motivational speech is used at the beginning and at the end of the lecture. Lecture-presentations and practical exercises use text, audio and video information, graphs, tables, etc.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	Implementation of practical work No. 1 - Natural and climatic factors affecting transport facilities.	0-100
	Performing practical work No.2 - The highway route plan, technical parameters.
	Practical work No. 3 - Longitudinal and transverse profiles, technical parameters.
	Implementation of practical work No. 4 - Operation of transport facilities, winter snow protection.
	Control work 1 - Technical parameters of the highway.
2 rating	Implementation of practical work No. 5 - Spillage protection and anti-avalanche measures.	0-100
	Implementation of practical work No. 6 - Protective measures against rockfalls and scree.
	Implementation of practical work No. 7 - Measures against the landslide circus.
	Implementation of practical work No. 8 - Design and calculation of rigid type pavement.
	Control work 2 - Elements by types of engineering structures.
Total control	Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Interview on control questions	Demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions	Demonstrates strong theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes minor mistakes, which he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher;	Demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by correction by a teacher;	Demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions
Work in practical classes	Completed practical work in full in compliance with the required sequence of actions; in the answer, correctly and accurately completes all records, tables, pictures, drawings, graphs, calculations; performs error analysis correctly.	Fulfilled the requirements for a “5” rating, but there were 2-3 shortcomings. The student’s answer to the questions satisfies the basic requirements for answering 5, but is given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using connections with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other disciplines.	Completed the work not completely, but not less than 50% of the volume of practical work, which allows you to obtain the correct results and conclusions; Errors were made during the work.	Completed practical work in full in compliance with the required sequence of actions; in the answer, correctly and accurately completes all records, tables, pictures, drawings, graphs, calculations; performs error analysis correctly.
Lecture sessions	- when studying lecture material, he demonstrates well in the survey, systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions	- demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge in lecture classes and, during a control survey, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes insignificant mistakes that he corrects independently or with minor correction by the teacher;	- during the control survey, shallow demonstrates weak theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by a teacher;	- when studying lecture material, he demonstrates well in the survey, systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, shows fluency in monologue speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifying questions
Examination block	- during the exam, he demonstrates systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, and gives an excellent answer to all three questions of the exam ticket.	- demonstrates solid theoretical knowledge at the exam, logically and consistently explains the essence of the proposed questions of the exam ticket, gives examples, shows fluency in topics;	- on the exam, he demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, but not less than 50% of the volume;	- during the exam, he demonstrates systemic theoretical knowledge, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, gives examples, and gives an excellent answer to all three questions of the exam ticket.

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of lectures

Introduction
Classification of highways
Methods for developing a route plan
Methods for developing a longitudinal profile
Methods for developing transverse profiles
Engineering protection
Инженерная защита
Engineering protection
Engineering protection
Engineering protection
Engineering protection
Engineering protection
Engineering protection
Hard type of road pavement
Hard type of road pavement

Key reading

1. Федотов Г.А., Поспелов П.И. Изыскание и проектирование автомобильных дорог. – М:, «Академия» 2015 г.- 465 с. 2. Горшков Н.Г. Изыскание и проектирование автомобильных дорог промышленного транспорта. –Белгород:, 2013 г. – 135 с. 3. СНиП РК 3.03-09-2006 Строительные нормы и правила. Автомобильные дороги, Астана 2007. 4. Методические рекомендации по проектированию жестких дорожных одежд . М.: Информавтодор, 2004. – 69 с. 5. СНиП РК 2.04-01-2001 «Строительная климатология» 6. СТ РК 1397 Требования к составу и оформлению проектной и рабочей документации. 7. Смирнова Т.Н. Общие требования к содержанию и оформлению учебно-методической литературы и других текстовых документов. У-Ка, ВКГТУ, 2002. 8. Б.Б. Каримов, Е.К. Салимбаев. Автомобильные дороги. Содружества Независимых Государств. М.: Интранедорнаука, 2006-264с

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan