Metrology, Standardization and Interchangeability Basics

Eserkegenova Bekzat Zhambylkyzy

The instructor profile

Description: The discipline studies the fundamentals of metrology and qualimetry, methods and means of technical measurements of physical quantities. Students analyze the standardization of parts and materials, their designations in technical documentation, design and technical documentation of technical products, requirements for the geometric parameters of parts and the characteristics of their surfaces. Students study the features of connections of various types of parts, the system of tolerances and fits in mechanical engineering, accuracy standards, and interchangeability of parts.

Amount of credits: 5

Course Workload:

Types of classes hours
Lectures 15
Practical works 30
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) 30
SAW (Student autonomous work) 75
Form of final control Exam
Final assessment method exam

Component: Component by selection

Cycle: Base disciplines

Goal
  • Studying the scientific, theoretical and methodological foundations of metrology, standardization and interchangeability, The main objectives of studying the discipline are: -the ability of students to apply in practice the main provisions of the course, the formation of scientific thinking among students; -to give students the minimum knowledge in the field that will allow the specialist to improve in the future, independently make technical decisions at the international, regional and at the national level.
Objective
  • - The main objectives of studying the discipline are: -the ability of students to apply the main provisions of the course in practice, the formation of scientific thinking among students; -to give students the minimum knowledge in the field that will allow the specialist to improve in the future, independently make technical decisions at the international, regional and national levels; -skills of working with standards, GOST standards, technical documentation; -ability to work with patent literature, study of foreign experience in the field of standardization.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
  • Theoretical and practical foundations of metrology, standardization and interchangeability; - A system of tolerances and fits for all major joints – bearing joints, smooth, threaded, spline, toothed, etc. - Dimensional chains, their importance in manufacturing
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
  • Describe technologies and properties of materials, assess their compliance with standards; create mechanisms, electric drives and activators; apply measurement skills
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
  • It allows you to develop scientifically based skills to meet the requirements of standards. The development of the country's economy in terms of market relations depends on the production of machine-building products. Engineering students will acquire the competencies to correctly solve problems in metrology, standardization, and the basics of interchangeability.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
  • During their studies, students should develop the skills to discuss and analyze various technical standards and measurement methods, as well as the ability to interact with colleagues, supervisors, experts, and clients within a given topic.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
  • Knowledge of international and national standards in the field of metrology and their role in ensuring product quality. The ability to adapt and apply standards to ensure that products and processes meet the required specifications.
Teaching methods

The following educational technologies are provided for during the training sessions: - 1. Lecture-seminar-credit system 2. Research methods 3. Information and communication technologies 1.5.2 Adaptive educational technologies (inclusive learning) The following adaptive educational technologies can be used to successfully master the discipline when teaching people with disabilities: - For the successful development of the discipline, the following adaptive educational technologies can be used in teaching people with disabilities: - distance education; - personality-oriented (for example, the use of an on-screen keyboard and alternative input devices for students with musculoskeletal disorders; equipment of the classroom in which students with hearing impairments study with computer technology, audio equipment, video equipment, electronic whiteboard);

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period Type of task Total
1  rating Control work/Testing 0-100
2  rating Control work/Testing 0-100
Total control Exam 0-100
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task 90-100 70-89 50-69 0-49
Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Practical tasks Excellent understanding of the material, comprehensive knowledge, excellent skills and proficiency A fairly complete understanding of the material, good knowledge, skills and proficiency Acceptable understanding of the material, satisfactory knowledge, skills and proficiency Excellent understanding of the material, comprehensive knowledge, excellent skills and proficiency
Laboratory work The relevance of the topic under consideration is reflected, the main categories are correctly identified; in conclusion , detailed, independent conclusions are formulated.; the relevance of the topic is revealed; there are minor errors and shortcomings in the studied material; in conclusion , general conclusions are formulated. the relevance of the topic has not been fully disclosed; the theoretical analysis is descriptive, the student has not reflected his own position on the materials under consideration, a number of judgments are shallow; conclusions have not been formulated. The relevance of the topic under consideration is reflected, the main categories are correctly identified; in conclusion , detailed, independent conclusions are formulated.;
Rating test 1, 2 Excellent understanding of the material, comprehensive knowledge, excellent skills and proficiency A fairly complete understanding of the material, good knowledge, skills and proficiency Acceptable understanding of the material, satisfactory knowledge, skills and proficiency Excellent understanding of the material, comprehensive knowledge, excellent skills and proficiency
Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

  • 40% of the examination result;
  • 60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6 MT1+MT2 +0,4E
2

 

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade Numerical value Points (%) Traditional grade
A 4.0 95-100 Excellent
A- 3.67 90-94
B+ 3.33 85-89 Good
B 3.0 80-84
B- 2.67 75-79
C+ 2.33 70-74
C 2.0 65-69 Satisfactory
C- 1.67 60-64
D+ 1.33 55-59
D 1.0 50-54
FX 0.5 25-49 Unsatisfactory
F 0 0-24
Topics of lectures
  • Topic 1
  • Topic 2
  • Topic 3
  • Topic 4
  • Topic 5
  • Topic 6
  • Topic 7
  • Topic 8
  • Topic 9
  • Topic 10
  • Topic 11
  • Topic 12
  • Topic 13
  • Topic 14
  • Topic 15
Key reading
  • 1. Комбаев К.К. «Метрология стандартизация и сертификация» - учебник для технических специальностей. Алматы, «Эверо» -2015 г. 132 с. ISBN 978-601-240-784-6. 2. Дудкин М.В., Комбаев К.К. «Сызықтық өлшеулер» Өскемен қаласы, ШҚМТУ, 2012 ж. – 58 б. 3. Якушев А.И. Взаимозаменяемость, стандартизация и технические измерения. - М.: Машиностроение, 2007. 4. Комбаев К.К. Метрология, стандарттау және сертификаттау. Техникалық мамандықтары бойынша оқитын студенттерге арналған оқу құралы. Алматы «Эверо» -2018 ж. 244 б. ISBN 978-601-208-536-5, 2-ші басылым, жаңартылған және толықтырылған. ШҚМТУ Ғылыми кеңесінің әдістемелік отырысында бекітілген 04 шілде 2018 ж. № 10 хаттамасы, ҚарМТУ РОӘК Ұсынылған 5. Дудкин М.В., Комбаев К.К., Шакаримов Ш.С., «Линейные измерения» - учебно-методическое пособие. Усть-Каменогорск, ВКГТУ, 2008, с.96. 6. Дудкин М.В. Выбор посадок и расчет размерных цепей: Учебное пособие / ВКГТУ.- Усть-Каменогорск, 2003. –116 с..
Further reading
  • 7. Комбаев Қ.Қ. Метрология, стандарттау және сертификаттау. Алматы, Эверо, 2015 ж. – 128 б 8. Сергеев А.Г., Латышев М.В., Терегеря В.В. Метрология, стандартизация, сертификация: Учебное пособие.–М.: Логос, 2010. –536 с: ил. 9. Марков Н.Н., Осипов В.В., Шабалина М.Б. Нормирование точности в машиностроении: Учеб. для машиностроит. спец. Вузов./– 2-е изд., испр. и доп. – М.: Высш. шк.; Издательский центр «Академия», 2011. –335 с: ил. 9. ГОСТ 868-82 Нутромеры индикаторные с ценой деления 0,01 мм. Технические условия