Lifting Equipment
Description: Presentation of knowledge about the operation and design of a mine lifting complex, which is one of the main links in the technological delivery of minerals from the earth's interior. formation and development of the ability to analyze and synthesize designs of mine lifting installations, stationary and tunneling lifting complexes; formation and development of the ability to determine ways to achieve goals when performing lifting operations, identify priorities for solving problems in the production, modernization and repair of mine lifting installations.
Amount of credits: 5
Пререквизиты:
- Introduction to Engineering
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | 15 |
| Practical works | 30 |
| Laboratory works | |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 30 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 75 |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | written exam |
Component: Component by selection
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- The formation of students' scientific and professional knowledge and skills in the field of mining mechanics, namely installations that ensure the lifting of minerals extracted from the mine to the surface.
Objective
- - creation of students' theoretical foundations in the field of lifting installations;
- - gaining knowledge about the designs of existing types of lifting installations;
- - study of the features of operation and calculation of kinematics and dynamics of lifting installations;
- - knowledge of the rules of safe operation of lifting installations.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- Knowledge and understanding of: - theoretical foundations in the field of lifting installations; - designs of existing types of lifting installations; - features of lifting installations; - calculation of kinematics and dynamics of lifting installations; - rules of safe operation of lifting installations
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- Application of knowledge and understanding: - be able to calculate the lifting installation; - choose a rational mode of operation and drive the installation; - critically evaluate the operational performance of existing installations in terms of reliability and cost-effectiveness; -operate lifting equipment in accordance with Safety Regulations
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- Forming judgments: They are able to integrate knowledge and cope with complex issues and formulate judgments based on incomplete or limited information on the application or development of new lifting machine designs, taking into account the social and ethical responsibility associated with the use of their knowledge and judgments.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- Communication: they can communicate their conclusions and the knowledge and justification used to formulate them on the operation of existing and development of new designs of lifting machines and other devices of mine lifting installations to specialists and non-specialists clearly and consistently.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- Training skills: they have the ability to apply the laws of kinematics and dynamics of lifting systems in the design of mine lifting installations, they know the areas of their application and the conditions of safe operation
Teaching methods
1. Lecture-seminar-credit system; collaborative learning (teamwork, group work); information and communication technologies; technology of project-based learning; research method of teaching.
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | An individual assignment is given to each student for the rating. | 0-100 |
| 2 rating | An individual assignment is given to each student for the rating. | 0-100 |
| Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| In accordance with section 8, "The policy of assessing students' academic achievements" of the AP NAO "VKTU" 029-III-2022 Academic Policy of the NAO "VKTU named after D. Serikbayev" | "Excellent" (90-100%) — the student has full knowledge, is able to apply theory to solve practical problems, performs calculations without errors, shows independence and initiative. | "Good" (70-89%) — the material has been sufficiently mastered, minor errors in calculations and conclusions have been made, the student is capable of independent work. | "Satisfactory" (50-69%) — knowledge is limited, mistakes are made when solving computational problems, and the help of a teacher is required. | "Excellent" (90-100%) — the student has full knowledge, is able to apply theory to solve practical problems, performs calculations without errors, shows independence and initiative. |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Topic 1
- Topic 2
- Topic 3
- Topic 4
- Topic 5
- Topic 6
- Topic 7
- Topic 8
- Topic 9
- Topic 10
- Topic 11
- Topic 12
- Topic 13
- 14
- Topic 15
Key reading
- Цетнарский И.А., Кораблев А.А., Борисенко Л.Д. Горная механика. Учеб-ное пособие. Изд. 2, перераб. и доп. – М.: Недра, 1985. – 280 с.
- Смородин С.С., Верстаков Г.В. Шахтные стационарные машины и уста-новки. Учебное пособие. – М.: Недра, 1981. – 280 с.
- Хаджиков Р.Н., Бутаков С.А. Горная механика. – М.: Недра, 1982. – 407 с.
- Картавый Н.Г. Стационарные машины: Учебник для вузов. – М.: Недра, 1984. – 327 с.
- Песвианидзе А.В. Расчет шахтных подъемных установок. Учеб. пособие для вузов. –М.: Недра, 1992. – 250 с.:ил.
- Федоров М.М. Шахтные подъемные установки. – М.: Недра, 1979. – 309 с.
- Кумыкова Т.М. Стационарные установки шахт в задачах и примерах. Учебное пособие. – Усть-Каменогорск: ВКГТУ, 2007. – 206 с.
Further reading
- Шахтные подъёмные установки: Учебное пособие / В. Н. Бизенков. Кемерово: ГУ КузГТУ, 2000. 32 с.
- Руководство по техническому обслуживанию и ремонту шахтных подъёмных установок. Москва: Изд-во «Недра», 1983.
