Problem of extracting valuable components of technogenic mineral formations in modern conditions

Seraya Natalia Vladimirovna

The instructor profile

Description: The course examines ways to intensify existing and create new highly effective methods for extracting valuable components from refractory mineral raw materials of natural and technogenic origin with the solution of such problems as: completeness and complexity of the development of solid mineral deposits, ensuring high profitability of the country's modern mineral resource complex and improving the environmental situation in mining regions.

Amount of credits: 6

Пререквизиты:

  • Integrated use of raw materials and metallurgical wastes
  • Modern and prospective technologies of ferrous and nonferrous metallurgy raw material resources processing

Course Workload:

Types of classes hours
Lectures 30
Practical works 30
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) 30
SAW (Student autonomous work) 90
Form of final control Exam
Final assessment method Oral examination

Component: Component by selection

Cycle: Profiling disciplines

Goal
  • The purpose of studying the discipline: - familiarization with the preparation of man-made and secondary raw materials for metallurgical processing; - study of the features of metallurgical technologies for obtaining metals from man-made and secondary raw materials; - familiarization with the features of technologies for recycling waste from metallurgical production.
Objective
  • Objectives of studying the discipline: - familiarization with scientific foundations, latest achievements and most important areas of metallurgical technologies for processing technogenic and secondary raw materials; - familiarization with modern and promising technologies of environmentally friendly technologies for processing secondary raw materials and technogenic waste; - mastering the principles of substantiation and creation of new technological processes and industries aimed at the production of high-quality products from secondary and technogenic raw materials.
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
  • To know the theoretical foundations of metallurgical technologies for processing man-made and secondary raw materials; the main technological processes and equipment for metallurgical production and technical and economic requirements for them, ensuring the quality of products taking into account the solution of resource and energy saving problems; directions for the development and improvement of technologies for processing man-made and secondary raw materials.
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
  • Apply modern technologies to create and design environmentally friendly production facilities for processing technogenic and secondary raw materials; assess potentially hazardous and harmful production factors in metallurgical production and select measures to ensure life safety and environmental protection; analyze and summarize technical literature on environmentally friendly production facilities in metallurgy; describe the production of metals from technogenic and secondary raw materials using structural process flow charts, and metallurgical processes using chemical reaction equations; draw up material balances, calculate the yield and composition of products; resolve issues of environmental protection and reduction of material and energy costs.
  • The master's student must be proficient in the following methods: - methods for assessing the quality indicators of metallurgical man-made resources; - methods for managing the recycling processes of secondary metallurgical materials.
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
  • The master's student should know: - processes occurring during metallurgical processing of technogenic and secondary raw materials; - the main characteristics of technogenic and secondary minerals; - analytical relationships between the quality of raw materials and metal production indicators.
  • A master's student must be able to: - determine the metallurgical characteristics of technogenic and secondary minerals; - conduct approximate calculations of harmful emissions and assess the environmental condition of existing and planned technological processes and units; - be able to select materials for products of various purposes, taking into account operational requirements and environmental protection.
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
  • to master generalized methods of research activity (problem setting, theoretical justification and experimental verification of its solution).
  • to master the basic methods, techniques and means of obtaining, accumulating and processing information.
  • be able to competently explain and present the results of an experiment.
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
  • In the process of mastering the discipline, the graduate student develops and demonstrates the following general professional competencies: - has a holistic system of scientific knowledge about the world around him, the ability to navigate the values ​​of being, life, culture; - is able to organize his work on a scientific basis, evaluate the results of his activities with a high degree of independence, has the skills of independent work; - is able to acquire new knowledge with a high degree of independence using modern educational and information technologies; - is able to independently apply methods and means of cognition, training and self-control, building and implementing promising lines of intellectual, cultural, moral, physical and professional self-development and self-improvement, is able, with the help of colleagues, to critically evaluate his strengths and weaknesses and draw the necessary conclusions; - is able to purposefully apply basic knowledge in the field of mathematics, natural sciences, humanities and economics in professional activities; - has sufficient skills in working with a personal computer for professional activities; - can make non-standard decisions; - has the theory and skills of practical work; - can analyze scientific literature in order to select a direction for research on a proposed topic; - is able to analyze the results obtained, draw the necessary conclusions and formulate proposals; - can present the results obtained in research in the form of reports.
Teaching methods

The following interactive technologies are used in studying the discipline: the method of assignments, the method of presenting information, the method of remote sensing. Lectures are given using multimedia equipment. Each lecture is accompanied by showing lecture demonstrations (slides and video clips). To master the discipline, interactive databases, space images of different resolutions, topographic maps of different scales are used. During practical work, a trip to natural areas and work with modern city plans and maps is carried out. In combination with extracurricular work this contributes to the formation and development of professional skills of students.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period Type of task Total
1  rating Test-survey "Introduction. Goals and objectives of the course. Basic concepts" 0-100
Additional lecture material "Man-made mineral deposits and their features"
Seminar session "Classification (TM) of man-made deposits by the method of formation and environmental impact on the environment"
Abstract "TM of the coal sub-industry"
Presentation report "TM of non-ferrous and rare metals"
Test-survey "Technogenic deposits of ferrous metals"
2  rating Individual assignment "Methodology and technique of geological and economic assessment of TM. Main stages of the study" 0-100
Test "Hardware and methodological support for analytical studies of TM"
Independent work "Technology of formation of a data bank on man-made deposits (DB TM)"
Additional lecture material "Problems of protection and rational use of subsoil. Monitoring of TM"
Additional lecture material and notes "Geo-ecological mapping and compilation of ecological-geological maps (EGM) for man-made deposits"
Report-presentation "The latest methods of enrichment and processing of minerals TM"
Total control Exam 0-100
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
Type of task 90-100 70-89 50-69 0-49
Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Testing. Oral survey. Written works. Protection of laboratory work. Current, intermediate and final control. The following grades correspond to an “excellent” grade: Grade A, which has a digital equivalent of 4.0 and a percentage of 95-100%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated creative understanding and independent practical application of the educational material, the use of additional sources for a deeper understanding of the essence of phenomena and processes, vision of the cognitive structure of the material, identification of missing elements of the structure, and their supplementation. High level of independence and creativity in completing the task. Identification of problem areas and risk zones. Creative use of acquired knowledge to solve problem situations. Grade A-, which has a digital equivalent of 3.67 and a percentage of 90-94%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated creative understanding and independent practical application of the educational material, the use of additional sources for a deeper understanding of the essence of phenomena and processes, vision of the cognitive structure of the material, identification of missing elements of the structure, and their supplementation. Identification of problem areas and risk zones. Creative use of acquired knowledge to solve problem situations. Self-assessment of activities, analysis of errors in work and the reasons for their occurrence, independent correction of them and planning of actions to improve one’s own skills. The following grades correspond to a “good” grade: Grade B+, which has a numerical equivalent of 3.33 and a percentage of 85-89%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated mastery of the educational material and its practical application. Independent combination of elements in order to create something new. Free handling of educational material of varying degrees of complexity in various situations. Sufficient level of independence and creativity when completing the task. Allowance for minor errors in actions and the ability to correct them on the recommendation of the teacher. Grade B, which has a numerical equivalent of 3.0 and a percentage of 80-84%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated mastery and free handling of the educational material and its practical application in standard and non-standard situations. Compares and differentiates available data for the purpose of their further application. Sufficient level of independence and creativity when completing the task. Allowance for minor errors in actions and the ability to correct them under the guidance of the teacher. Grade B-, which has a numerical equivalent of 2.67 and a percentage content of 75-79%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated mastery of the program material, its practical application, demonstration of acquired skills in standard and non-standard situations. The presence of natural motivation when completing assignments. Active participation in completing the assignment in a group. Allowing errors and mistakes, correcting them on the recommendation of the teacher; Grade C+, which has a numerical equivalent having a numerical equivalent of 2.33 and a percentage content of 70-74%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated mastery of the program material, its practical application, demonstration of acquired skills in standard, and sometimes in non-standard situations. The presence of natural motivation when completing assignments. Active participation in completing the assignment in a group. Allowing errors and minor mistakes, correcting them under the supervision of the teacher. The following grades correspond to the "satisfactory" grade: Grade C, which has a numerical equivalent of 2.0 and a percentage of 65-69%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated mastery of the program material, its practical application, and the ability to complete assignments according to established patterns. The desire to independently complete assignments, give examples, classify, compare, etc. Difficulty completing assignments in non-standard situations. Making mistakes and correcting them under the teacher's supervision. Grade C-, which has a numerical equivalent of 1.67 and a percentage of 60-64%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated understanding of the educational material and its mechanical application in typical situations. Independent completion of assignments without a deep understanding of its significance for the further process, which results in incompleteness and inconsistency of actions, leading to errors. Difficulty completing assignments in non-standard situations. Making mistakes and correcting them under the teacher's supervision. Grade D+, which has a digital equivalent of 1.33 and a percentage content of 55-59%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated mechanical mastery of the educational material at the reproductive level. Completion of assignments without deep understanding of its significance for the further process, the consequence of which is incompleteness and inconsistency of actions, leading to errors. Adjustment of activities under the guidance of the teacher. Difficulty in completing the assignment in non-standard situations; Grade D, which has a digital equivalent of 1.0 and a percentage content of 50-54%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated mechanical mastery of the educational material at the reproductive level under the guidance of the teacher. Reproduction of terms, concepts and facts. Use of the algorithm for completing work or assignments with the help of the teacher. The emergence of difficulties in completing assignments in standard and non-standard situations. The following grades correspond to an “excellent” grade: Grade A, which has a digital equivalent of 4.0 and a percentage of 95-100%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated creative understanding and independent practical application of the educational material, the use of additional sources for a deeper understanding of the essence of phenomena and processes, vision of the cognitive structure of the material, identification of missing elements of the structure, and their supplementation. High level of independence and creativity in completing the task. Identification of problem areas and risk zones. Creative use of acquired knowledge to solve problem situations. Grade A-, which has a digital equivalent of 3.67 and a percentage of 90-94%. This grade is given if the student has demonstrated creative understanding and independent practical application of the educational material, the use of additional sources for a deeper understanding of the essence of phenomena and processes, vision of the cognitive structure of the material, identification of missing elements of the structure, and their supplementation. Identification of problem areas and risk zones. Creative use of acquired knowledge to solve problem situations. Self-assessment of activities, analysis of errors in work and the reasons for their occurrence, independent correction of them and planning of actions to improve one’s own skills.
Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

  • 40% of the examination result;
  • 60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6 MT1+MT2 +0,4E
2

 

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade Numerical value Points (%) Traditional grade
A 4.0 95-100 Excellent
A- 3.67 90-94
B+ 3.33 85-89 Good
B 3.0 80-84
B- 2.67 75-79
C+ 2.33 70-74
C 2.0 65-69 Satisfactory
C- 1.67 60-64
D+ 1.33 55-59
D 1.0 50-54
FX 0.5 25-49 Unsatisfactory
F 0 0-24
Topics of lectures
  • Introduction
  • Composition and structure of TM
  • Classification of man-made deposits by the method of formation and environmental impact
  • Man-made deposits of the coal sub-industry
  • Man-made deposits of non-ferrous and rare metals
  • TM of ferrous metals
  • Methodology and technique of geological and economic assessment of technogenic deposits
  • Hardware and methodological support for analytical studies of TM
  • Technology of formation of a databank on technogenic deposits
  • Problems of protection and rational use of mineral resources
  • Latest methods of enrichment and processing of minerals TM
Key reading
  • Коннова Н.И. Обогащение и переработка минерального и техногенного сырья: учебник в 2-х частях. Ч. 1. Основы обогащения / Н.И. Коннова, Э.А. Рудницкий. Красноярск: Сиб. федер. ун-т., 2021. - 222 с.
  • Чекушин, В. С. Комплексная переработка минерального, вторичного и техногенного сырья благородных металлов : учебник / В. С. Чекушин, Н. В. Олейникова ; Сибирский федеральный университет. – Красноярск : Сибирский федеральный университет (СФУ), 2017. – 158 с.
  • Булатов К.В. Современные технологии переработки техногенного сырья [монография / К.В. Булатов, Г.И. Газалеева]; под редакцией кандидата технических наук К.В. Булатова и доктора технических наук Г.И. Газалеевой, Открытое акционерное общество Научно-исследовательский и проектный институт обогащения и механической обработки полезных ископаемых "ОАО Уралмеханобр". — Екатеринбург : Уралмеханобр, 2019. — 198 с.
  • Чекушин, В.С. Комплексная переработка минерального, вторичного и техногенного сырья благородных металлов : учебник / Н.В. Олейникова; В.С. Чекушин .— Эл. изд. — Красноярск : Сиб. федер. ун-т, 2017 .— 158 с.
  • Фоменко А.И. Технологии переработки техногенного сырья, Монография / Фоменко А.И., Инфра-инженерия, 2018. - 136 с.
  • Абрамов, А. А. Технология переработки и обогащения руд цветных металлов. Т. 3 : учебное пособие : в 2 книгах / А. А. Абрамов. — Москва : Горная книга, [б. г.]. — Книга 1 : Рудоподготовка и Cu, Cu-Py, Cu-Fe, Mo, Cu-Mo,Cu-Zn руды — 2005. — 575 с.
Further reading
  • Абрамов, А.А. Технология переработки и обогащения руд цветных металлов. В 2 кн. Т.3. Книга 2. Pb, Pb-Cu, Zn, Pb-Zn, Pb-Cu-Zn, Cu-Ni, Co-, Bi-, Sb-, Hg- содержащие руды [Электронный ресурс] : учебное пособие / А.А. Абрамов. — Электрон. дан. — Москва : Горная книга, 2005. — 470 с.
  • Абрамов, А.А. Переработка, обогащение и комплексное использование твердых полезных ископаемых. Т.2. Технология переработки и обогащения полезных ископаемых [Электронный ресурс] : учебник / А.А. Абрамов. — Электрон. дан. — Москва : Горная книга, 2004. — 510 с.
  • Абрамов, А.А. Флотационные методы обогащения [Электронный ресурс] : учеб. — Электрон. дан. — Москва : Горная книга, 2008. — 711 с.
  • Карамушка, В.П. Рекультивация объектов добычи и переработки урановых руд [Электронный ресурс] / В.П. Карамушка, Е.Н. Камнев, Р.Е. Кузин. — Электрон. дан. — Москва : Горная книга, 2014. — 183 с.
  • Рациональное использование вторичных минеральных ресурсов в условиях экологизации и внедрения наилучших доступных технологий : монография / коллектив авторов ; под науч. ред. д. э. н., проф. Ф. Д. Ларичкина, д. э. н., проф. В. А. Кныша. — Апатиты : Издательство ФИЦ КНЦ РАН, 2019. — 252 с.