Development and examination of ICT research projects
Description: The discipline is aimed at studying the requirements for fundamental and applied scientific research and experimental developments in the field of ICT, the processes of organizing and conducting expertise of projects for commercialization of the results of scientific and scientific-technical activities. Practical skills of writing applications on the topic of research for scientific grants, skills of scientific and technical analysis and expertise of projects in the field of ICT are being developed
Amount of credits: 5
Пререквизиты:
- Machine Learning and Data Analysis
Course Workload:
| Types of classes | hours |
|---|---|
| Lectures | 15 |
| Practical works | |
| Laboratory works | 30 |
| SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance) | 75 |
| SAW (Student autonomous work) | 30 |
| Form of final control | Exam |
| Final assessment method | exam |
Component: University component
Cycle: Profiling disciplines
Goal
- Preparation of a doctoral student to compile a package of necessary tender documentation and formation of an understanding of the algorithm for conducting the project examination procedure
Objective
- Acquisition by doctoral students of theoretical knowledge in the field of expertise of scientific projects and practical skills in drawing up a package of necessary tender documentation
Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding
- the fundamentals of organizing and conducting an examination of projects for the commercialization of the results of scientific and (or) scientific and technical activities
Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding
- be able to compile a package of necessary tender documentation for submitting an application for a funded competition
Learning outcome: formation of judgments
- skills of drawing up a package of necessary tender documentation for submitting an application for a funded competition
Learning outcome: communicative abilities
- be able to work in a team in the implementation of projects, including international ones
Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities
- be able to formulate competitive ideas and innovative tasks, apply non-standard methods for their implementation
Teaching methods
Research Technology
Technology of educational and research activities
Communication technologies (discussions, press conference, brainstorming, educational debates, etc.)
Information and communication (including remote) technologies
Assessment of the student's knowledge
Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.
| Period | Type of task | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 rating | Studying the rules for organizing competitions | 0-100 |
| Study of the composition and content of the required documentation | ||
| Project management - as a type of management activity | ||
| 2 rating | Drawing up an application for the competition - relevance, purpose, novelty, significance, methods used | 0-100 |
| Compilation of the application for the competition - calendar plan, research team, expected results of the project | ||
| Evaluation of applications according to competitive selection criteria | ||
| Total control | Exam | 0-100 |
The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type
| Type of task | 90-100 | 70-89 | 50-69 | 0-49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
Evaluation form
The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:
- 40% of the examination result;
- 60% of current control result.
The final grade is calculated by the formula:
| FG = 0,6 | MT1+MT2 | +0,4E |
| 2 |
Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;
E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.
Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:
The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:
| Alphabetical grade | Numerical value | Points (%) | Traditional grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.0 | 95-100 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | 90-94 | |
| B+ | 3.33 | 85-89 | Good |
| B | 3.0 | 80-84 | |
| B- | 2.67 | 75-79 | |
| C+ | 2.33 | 70-74 | |
| C | 2.0 | 65-69 | Satisfactory |
| C- | 1.67 | 60-64 | |
| D+ | 1.33 | 55-59 | |
| D | 1.0 | 50-54 | |
| FX | 0.5 | 25-49 | Unsatisfactory |
| F | 0 | 0-24 |
Topics of lectures
- Competitions funded by the state
- Legal basis for competitive financing
- Composition of tender documentation
- Qualification requirements for potential performers
- Requirements for the form and content of the application for participation in the competition for grant funding
- Factors and signs of scientific and technical effectiveness of R&D
- Research expertise
- IS Center for Scientific and Technical Expertise
Key reading
- Rules for organizing and conducting an examination of projects for the commercialization of the results of scientific and (or) scientific and technical activities. Adilet website: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus
- https://is.ncste.kz/
Further reading
- Smirnov S.A. Otsenka rezul'tativnosti nauchnykh issledovaniy i formy kommertsializatsii ikh rezul'tatov. Novosibirskiy GU ekonomiki i upravleniya «NINKH»
